Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 30 Jul 2007 (Monday) 10:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Little Butterfly. C&C Welcome

 
randomgrafix
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.
     
Jul 30, 2007 10:41 |  #1

Continuing my newbie efforts at macro here are some small butterflies I found in my garden a few weeks back. C&C welcomed.

GEAR
Canon Rebel 300D
28-105mm USMII
Vivitar Close-Up Lenses
Canon Speedlite 380EX Flash


I know they're a bit soft so I'd love to hear how I can make these shots better and sharper with the gear I used.

All the soften area of each shot are the natural effect from the close-up lenses. I only added a little sharpening and a little saturation for each shot.

Butterfly 1

IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1289/951330412_646dce74f6_o.jpg

Butterfly 2
IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1065/950473803_525a357445_o.jpg

Butterfly 3
IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1204/950472947_1e06f439b2_o.jpg

Marlon & Nicole - "CANONS TO THE RIGHT OF THEM. CANONS TO THE LEFT OF THEM. CANONS IN FRONT OF THEM, VOLLEY'D AND THUNDER'D!"
Canon XTi &
300D/Canon 18-55/Canon 50 f1.8/Canon 70-200 f4L/Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5/Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3 - Website: (external link) l POSITIVE FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eccles
Goldmember
Avatar
2,948 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Jul 30, 2007 14:21 |  #2

Well, the good news is that you've proven that you can take shots of butterflies. The bad news is that awful Vivitar c/u lens. You should aim to ditch it at the earliest opportunity. You CAN get quite good results from a close up lens - check out some of my posts with my Canon S3 using the Canon 500D or Raynox DCR-250 - but not from a single element one. Hoya and Vivitar are one step up from the bottom of a bottle.
Having said that, I appreciate that cash might be a problem, and there are things that you can do with what you have:
1. Do you have Photoshop? If so, shoot raw and use the lens correction tool to get rid of the colour fringing.
2. Shoot at small apertures as this will not only help your DOF but also improve edge sharpness from the Vivitar lens.
3. On a minimal budget you can get yourself a set of extension tubes. You can use these for now with your kit lens, and they'll still be useful if you get a macro lens in future.
HTH,
Eccles.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Attic
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,371 posts
Likes: 101
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Rural Hampshire
     
Jul 30, 2007 14:40 |  #3

I agree with Eccles, I bought a Raynox 250 and have been totally amazed at the results you can get from it.


Alby

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomgrafix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.
     
Jul 31, 2007 06:47 |  #4

eccles wrote in post #3637791 (external link)
Well, the good news is that you've proven that you can take shots of butterflies. The bad news is that awful Vivitar c/u lens. You should aim to ditch it at the earliest opportunity. You CAN get quite good results from a close up lens - check out some of my posts with my Canon S3 using the Canon 500D or Raynox DCR-250 - but not from a single element one. Hoya and Vivitar are one step up from the bottom of a bottle.
Having said that, I appreciate that cash might be a problem, and there are things that you can do with what you have:
1. Do you have Photoshop? If so, shoot raw and use the lens correction tool to get rid of the colour fringing.
2. Shoot at small apertures as this will not only help your DOF but also improve edge sharpness from the Vivitar lens.
3. On a minimal budget you can get yourself a set of extension tubes. You can use these for now with your kit lens, and they'll still be useful if you get a macro lens in future.
HTH,
Eccles.

Thnx Eccles, I appreciate the tips and will put them info effect immediately. You're very right about the budget, I'm saving up for a 100mm or the 105mm Sigma. Any advise on which one's better?


Marlon & Nicole - "CANONS TO THE RIGHT OF THEM. CANONS TO THE LEFT OF THEM. CANONS IN FRONT OF THEM, VOLLEY'D AND THUNDER'D!"
Canon XTi &
300D/Canon 18-55/Canon 50 f1.8/Canon 70-200 f4L/Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5/Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3 - Website: (external link) l POSITIVE FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomgrafix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.
     
Jul 31, 2007 06:51 |  #5

Attic wrote in post #3637929 (external link)
I agree with Eccles, I bought a Raynox 250 and have been totally amazed at the results you can get from it.

Hi Alby, I actually have a Raynox 250 in my Wish List on Amazon so hopefully soon I'll buy it. Thnx.


Marlon & Nicole - "CANONS TO THE RIGHT OF THEM. CANONS TO THE LEFT OF THEM. CANONS IN FRONT OF THEM, VOLLEY'D AND THUNDER'D!"
Canon XTi &
300D/Canon 18-55/Canon 50 f1.8/Canon 70-200 f4L/Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5/Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3 - Website: (external link) l POSITIVE FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eccles
Goldmember
Avatar
2,948 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Jul 31, 2007 12:10 |  #6

Depending on comparative prices in Trinidad & Tobago, I would still suggest that a set of extension tubes may well be your most cost effective purchase. They simply allow your existing lenses to focus closer. Since there's no glass in them there's not much benefit in going for Canon and many people here use Kenko. I use close up lenses because I have no alternative with my S3 which is a fixed lens compact.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomgrafix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.
     
Jul 31, 2007 13:29 |  #7

eccles wrote in post #3643738 (external link)
Depending on comparative prices in Trinidad & Tobago, I would still suggest that a set of extension tubes may well be your most cost effective purchase. They simply allow your existing lenses to focus closer. Since there's no glass in them there's not much benefit in going for Canon and many people here use Kenko. I use close up lenses because I have no alternative with my S3 which is a fixed lens compact.

Actually the only photography equip. I ever bought here (in Trinidad) was my 70-200mm f4L. And that's because I got it from a buddy at a steal ($400US:grin:) but normally the prices here are 3-5 times what you would normally pay in the US... so I buy online and wait until I know someone coming into the country to bring it for me (customs' fees here are also very high so I avoid shipping directly).
Having said that, the Kenko tubes cost about $169US (Adorama & Amazon) and the Raynox is about $40US so the Raynox would actually be the most cost effective solution.

I'd be interested to see and shots you guys took with the Raynox.


Marlon & Nicole - "CANONS TO THE RIGHT OF THEM. CANONS TO THE LEFT OF THEM. CANONS IN FRONT OF THEM, VOLLEY'D AND THUNDER'D!"
Canon XTi &
300D/Canon 18-55/Canon 50 f1.8/Canon 70-200 f4L/Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5/Tamron 28-300 f3.5-6.3 - Website: (external link) l POSITIVE FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,172 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Little Butterfly. C&C Welcome
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2824 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.