gcogger wrote in post #3641436
Until the GIMP implements colour management then no, it's not a viable alternative IMHO. That's up near the top of my 'absolutely necessary' list.
I believe the (soon to be released 2.4 (maybe even the current 2.3XX build)) is supposed to have color-management... but I haven't looked too closely at it.
I like it, and still use it (in conjuntion with PS Elements... which you can find for pretty cheap on e-bay.) If I need to do something Elements can't handle, I'll send the image to the Gimp (layer masking, curves, other tools).
There are alot of tutorials now for the gimp... (granted TONS more for PS) And it can be confusing translating PS tutorials to the Gimp's commands. There is a version of the gimp called Gimpshop, which tries to mimic PS command names and menu layout, so you may try that. (though its several builds behind current version of Gimp)
There are several commercial books and the thick free manual for the gimp.
Gimp will always be several years behind PS in terms of development, no argument there. But for the price? Hard to knock it... come on, its $600 cheaper than CS3! But after getting Elements 3.0 with my Graphire tablet, I've come to use it mainly, so that I can use PS plugins and filters, and other tools. For saving that kind of money, I'll settle for a quiltwork set of tools!