Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 30 Jul 2007 (Monday) 19:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is Photography "elitist" ?

 
coolershaka
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: London
     
Jul 30, 2007 19:52 |  #1

Hello,

I've always had a great interest photography as an art form, and very much wanted to take a deeper interest. However I felt I could never "get into it" as such due to the high cost of equipment and my experiences meeting Photography and other Visual Arts students at university.

I studied for my degree in Manchester (and later in Paris and London), and met a number of visual arts and photography students during my studies. Many got into it as their parents were either professional photographers and artists or art dealers and gallery owners, and it seemed a logical step for them. Very few rented equipment from the University, having a decent set of tools for themselves. Only one that I met could be regarded as coming from a "working class" background.

Also, many of the photos that used to be displayed in the graduate exhibitions were often of seemingly glamorous places abroad that I couldn't afford to visit myself until several years later. It made me think at the time that professional Photography, Sculpture and Painting were quite "elitist" careers, in the same way as one often regards being a professional tennis player or barrister. It was only later that I realised that I could be wrong about this.

Does anyone else have an opinion about this, or similar experiences?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Jul 30, 2007 19:56 |  #2

it is only elitist if one thinks that gear makes the photographer. but alas, it is the photographer's eye that makes him one. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,769 posts
Likes: 1251
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 30, 2007 20:13 |  #3

Believe me when I say that I know what you mean and are gong through.

Those born with a silver spoon in their mouth will always have an upper edge at the beginning of the curve. This is readily apparent in the early days while they are networking, gaining exposure, having the ability to acquire the latest gear and being able to travel the globe to unique and exotic places on mum and dad's inheritence.

I also believe that just about anyone with a few years camera experience under their belt can bring back a great photo from a great place whether its the Eiffel Tower, the Grand Canyon or Lake Geneva.

What separates one group from another then? A burning desire to succeed with a dose of hard work, education, talent, a bit of skill and then being respected in your own right.

Having the ability to "get the shot" wherever you are and while using older equipment and, having cost you a couple of years of hard work, savings and sacrifice to be there at that moment to get the shot allows you to more fully appreciate the image and, therefore, market it more fiercely.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coolershaka
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: London
     
Jul 30, 2007 20:40 |  #4

Thanks for your replies. It seems that I wasn't imagining it then!

The question to me is an academic one, since I studied Physics and went on to a totally different career. However, professional photography (as did other forms of visual art) did strike me for a while as being elitist and expensive i.e. the cost of equipment, studios, travel if that is your thing, hiring of models etc. I wondered for a while if there were people doing it from poorer backgrounds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the_incubus
my head exploded
Avatar
3,456 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Jul 30, 2007 20:56 |  #5

physics is a very important part of photography and if you studied physics learning photography will be much easier.

Oh and there are people from poorer backgrounds who are photogs.


And they're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the same.
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,769 posts
Likes: 1251
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 30, 2007 21:15 as a reply to  @ the_incubus's post |  #6

I wondered for a while if there were people doing it from poorer backgrounds.

Absolutely! Some people join the Navy to see photograph the exotic places, and with hopes of buying gear cheaper in Japan directly.

Others shoot models on a Trade For Prints deal so that the model gets prints and the photographer gets a release.

Unless you are working as a photographer for some huge publisher (e.g. Sport's Illustrated) then you are strapped with a small budget and have to start small and work your way up - just like many others have done before.

Personally, I appreciate all fine art more from someone that has walked the walk and is not some ecentric ego trip.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillMarks
Senior Member
525 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
     
Jul 30, 2007 23:07 |  #7

coolershaka wrote in post #3639782 (external link)
Hello,

I've always had a great interest photography as an art form, and very much wanted to take a deeper interest. However I felt I could never "get into it" as such due to the high cost of equipment and my experiences meeting Photography and other Visual Arts students at university.

Sounds like you convinced yourself to stop trying. Pitty.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,421 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Is Photography "elitist" ?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1675 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.