Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 02 Aug 2007 (Thursday) 09:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens Hoods

 
prrs4me
Senior Member
326 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Aug 02, 2007 09:21 |  #1

Can I use the lens hood that came with the 24-105L ef on the 17-55 ef s? The 24-105 is EW-83H and the one listed for the 17-55 is EW-83J. The EW-83H seems to fit fine on the 17-55.
Is there a difference?
Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pagnamenta
Senior Member
787 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
     
Aug 02, 2007 10:19 |  #2

The lens hood designs are what Canon feels help reduce flare and ghosting, so the hoods specified for the lenses are what you should use. There isn't a negative effect of using the hoods on different lenses. However, you might find that you can see the hood through the viewfinder at the 17mm mark. That's because the 83J hood is wider than the 83H.


Canon 1D3, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 120-300 f2.8 (sale), 1.4x converter, 580EX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
B3SEO
Senior Member
Avatar
783 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Washington State
     
Aug 02, 2007 10:48 |  #3

Only one way to find out. Shoot some photos with it, and see if you can the hood.


Step back please... I'm armed with a camera...
_______________
Gear - Canon 5D/Grip, Canon 20D/Grip, EF 17-40mm, EF 24-70mm/2.8, EF 28-135mm IS, EF 50mm/1.4, EF 85mm/1.2, EF 135mm/2.0, EF 200mm/2.8, Canon 70-200mm/2.8 Canon 580EX II (3)
Other Stuff - Manfrotto Tripods/Heads, Domke bag, Pelikan Cases

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Aug 02, 2007 11:02 as a reply to  @ B3SEO's post |  #4

You'll get vignetting of the shorter focal lengths.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 02, 2007 11:27 |  #5

Remember that lens hoods actually are designed for AOV! A 24-105mm on FF camera sees 23 to 84 degree AOV; a 17-55mm EFS lens sees 28 to 77 degree AOV. So at the wide setting, the 24-105 hood is designed to not vignette to 84 degrees, so using it on the 17-55 with the lens wide open would mean that it does not provide as much shading as the 17-55 hood.

20droger wrote in post #3655851 (external link)
You'll get vignetting of the shorter focal lengths.

Hoods are designed for the widest end of the FL range, not the narrowest!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Aug 02, 2007 13:41 |  #6

Wilt wrote in post #3655990 (external link)
Remember that lens hoods actually are designed for AOV! A 24-105mm on FF camera sees 23 to 84 degree AOV; a 17-55mm EFS lens sees 28 to 77 degree AOV. So at the wide setting, the 24-105 hood is designed to not vignette to 84 degrees, so using it on the 17-55 with the lens wide open would mean that it does not provide as much shading as the 17-55 hood.

Hoods are designed for the widest end of the FL range, not the narrowest!

But the shortest focal lengths are the widest :)


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 02, 2007 13:57 |  #7

pwm2 wrote in post #3656794 (external link)
But the shortest focal lengths are the widest :)

Situation A (17-55): 17mm sees 77 degrees on APS-C
Situation B (24-70): 24mm sees 84 degrees on FF

So if you took Hood B and put it on lens A, at 17mm (77 degrees) it would not vignette because the hood is designed for a wider 84 degree AOV; but it also would not provide as good quality of shading from strong light sources like the sun.

And if you took Hood A and put it on lens B (which is not what the OP was asking), at 24mm it would vignette because the lens sees 84 degrees yet the opening of the hood is designed for the narrower 17mm (77 degree) AOV

At the other end of the focal range, which is what 20droger was commenting about...

So if you took Hood B and put it on lens A, at 55mm it would not vignette because it is designed for a wide 24mm AOV; and it also would not provide as good quality of shading from strong light sources like the sun, as a hood for a dedicated tele zoom or single FL zoom!

And if you took Hood A and put it on lens B, at 70mm it would not vignette because it is designed for a wide 17mm AOV; and it also would not provide as good quality of shading from strong light sources like the sun, as a hood for a dedicated tele zoom or single FL zoom!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Aug 02, 2007 14:04 |  #8

Wilt wrote in post #3656884 (external link)
Situation A (17-55): 17mm sees 77 degrees on APS-C
Situation B (24-70): 24mm sees 84 degrees on FF

So if you took Hood B and put it on lens A, at 17mm (77 degrees) it would not vignette because the hood is designed for a wider 84 degree AOV; but it also would not provide as good quality of shading from strong light sources like the sun.

And if you took Hood A and put it on lens B (which is not what the OP was asking), at 24mm it would vignette because the lens sees 84 degrees yet the opening of the hood is designed for the narrower 17mm (77 degree) AOV

At the other end of the focal range, which is what 20droger was commenting about...

So if you took Hood B and put it on lens A, at 55mm it would not vignette because it is designed for a wide 24mm AOV; and it also would not provide as good quality of shading from strong light sources like the sun, as a hood for a dedicated tele zoom or single FL zoom!

And if you took Hood A and put it on lens B, at 70mm it would not vignette because it is designed for a wide 17mm AOV; and it also would not provide as good quality of shading from strong light sources like the sun, as a hood for a dedicated tele zoom or single FL zoom!

No, 20droger did write:

You'll get vignetting of the shorter focal lengths.

I.e. that the wrong hood will give vignetting at the wide end of the lens. You are talking about the same thing. No one in this thread is worrying about the 55mm/70mm range.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 02, 2007 14:06 |  #9

pwm2 wrote in post #3656937 (external link)
No, 20droger did write:
I.e. that the wrong hood will give vignetting at the wide end of the lens. You are talking about the same thing. No one in this thread is worrying about the 55mm/70mm range.

:oops: Misread MULTIPLE times!!!:oops:


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Aug 02, 2007 14:07 |  #10

Happens to us all :)


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 02, 2007 14:09 |  #11

When I cannot recall what the original question is, and provide an answer to a completely different question, then I know I am suffering from Old Timer's Disease and should disconnect my internet cable permanently!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Aug 02, 2007 14:22 |  #12

Ah, but a large part of our reading skills are based on our assumptions - what we expect to read. When we have made a decision what a sentence says, we can read it many times without seeing the error - or that the sentence may have several meanings. While missfiring sometimes, that extrapolation skill is probably one of the most important aspects of humanity.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Aug 02, 2007 14:22 |  #13

I have an 83H hood and an 83 hood (made in China, bought from eBay.) Use them interchangeably on either the 10-22, 17-55 or 24-105. No problem.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Aug 02, 2007 23:54 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #14

Allow me to correct myself.

Since one of your lenses is an EF-S lens, I presume you have a 1.6× camera.

The EF 24-105mm lens is designed for a 1.0× camera and has a maximum angle of view on such a camera of 84.1°. The EW-83H hood designed for this lens therefore accomidates an angle of view of 84.1°.

The EF-S 17-55mm lens is designed for a 1.6× camera and has a maximum angle of view on such a camera of 77.0° . Since the EW-83H is designed for an angle greater than 77.0°, it should work well on the EF-S 17-55mm lens.

My apologies for my first answer. That answer was off the top of my head, and assumed everything was equal. But everything wasn't equal. The lenses were designed with different-sized sensors in mind, which changes everything.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prrs4me
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
326 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Aug 03, 2007 07:29 as a reply to  @ 20droger's post |  #15

Thanks for all the input.
20droger-I ordered the proper hood yesterday! I should have mentioned in my first post that I have a Canon XTI.
Oh well, I think it will be better to have separate ones anyway. That way I can leave them on the lenses.
Thanks again.:)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,772 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Lens Hoods
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
925 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.