Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 05 Aug 2007 (Sunday) 12:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Arin & Brad - successful Lightroom use finally

 
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:22 |  #1

I shot a wedding for my family. I found it quite easy to balance shooting and visiting. The bride is my cousin and a close one at that. I consider her a sister.

That being said I feared doing a family wedding. It just seemed something that I wouldn't do. Don't preach any BS to me that I took money away from someone else. I shoot weddings so step off.

To my point though, I had not been able to modify what I'm doing enough to intergrate Lightroom into my workflow. I of course shot RAW only and made myself use Lightroom. I used my import workflow and stapled Lightroom into it. Luckily I had a nice clean sensor so booger removal was not needed. It wasn't a large expectation as far as delivery goes. Take some nice shots and to quote her "Don't do all those lame cliché shots."

I'll be doing my first Askua book with this as well. My wife is not making books anymore. Asuka has put her out of business. ;)

Sample shot:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:27 |  #2

I love the background and pose, however the skin tone looks very ashen and there appear to be darker spots on their faces.


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:30 |  #3

Their skin looked horrible.

Plus I'm not into making people look plastic. I do very subtle skin work. Zits, cat scratches. If there is a flash hot spot I'll tone it down.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:37 |  #4

1Ds Mk.II, 85 1.8. Zero saturation. Polarizer. Nothing done to the image other than some highlights brought down in Lightroom.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:39 |  #5

Congrats on moving to Lightroom. It's awesome once you get the hang of it. It looks like you may have used a little too much noise reduction though. I find that the version 1.1 noise reducers work VERY well at settings around 15-20, but start looking fake beyond that. The version 1.0 noise algorithms hardly had any effect even up to 80.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:53 |  #6

picturecrazy wrote in post #3672698 (external link)
It looks like you may have used a little too much noise reduction though.

You are very correct. I went back and opened it again and looked at the preset I had downloaded. It had noise reduction/colour smoothing cranked up and I like to run that at zero in ACR. Redux below.

I looked through the other shots and this series only is affected as much by the excessive noise reduction. I do find limitations in Lightroom in that is it hard to globally wipe a setting such as this. Kelby's book will help me a bit, but I will proof the keepers with CS3 before I let any product out the door with Lightroom.

Not entirely successful yet I would say. It's good for processing the filler. My ACR in CS3 is dialed. I should have Lightroom this way before day's end.

ps: these are still in prophoto RGB. I'm only doing for print right now.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ulfius
Member
43 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Moscow, ID
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:54 |  #7

I have to say that #1 just doesn't look real to me. It looks like they're in front of a backdrop.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 12:58 |  #8

So are you saying that I used a backdrop or the background was just too good to use?


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mkuriger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Valencia, California
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:05 |  #9

their skin looks very green/grey. white balance problem maybe?

hmm, OK i just dragged the photo into photoshop and the colors look correct now. perhaps you're not converting them to "web palette" before posting them online??

here is a conversion to web colors. I'm guessing you won't be able to tell since your computer sees the same colors you used to make the original.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Michael Kuriger
My Myspace (external link)
ikekuriger@gmail.com (external link)
Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 30D | Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS | Canon 70-200mm F4L | Canon 24-70mm F2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xmacvicar
Mr. Wizard "B.D.B on POTN"
Avatar
543 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:06 |  #10

I find, even in the 2nd edit - their skin tone and the overall appearance of the skin looks incredibly off. Looks like the sharpening and noise reduction was overdone - back off of that even more to bring it back to normal.


Bodies: Canon 40D & Grip, Canon 5D
Lenses: Canon 70-200 2.8L IS, Canon 24-70, Canon 50L 1.2, Canon 85 f/1.8, Sigma 50mm Macro
Flash: Canon 580ex II, Pocket Wizard Plus II (2)
http://www.davidmacvic​ar.com/blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mkuriger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Valencia, California
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:08 |  #11

I missed his post, he's using prophoto RGB colors (for printing). they don't show on the web properly.

xmacvicar wrote in post #3672785 (external link)
I find, even in the 2nd edit - their skin tone and the overall appearance of the skin looks incredibly off. Looks like the sharpening and noise reduction was overdone - back off of that even more to bring it back to normal.


Michael Kuriger
My Myspace (external link)
ikekuriger@gmail.com (external link)
Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 30D | Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS | Canon 70-200mm F4L | Canon 24-70mm F2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:12 |  #12

Nice shots Jason,

The WB looks off though and it looks a bit flat. Do you mind if I post an edit done in Lightroom with a list of adjustments done?


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:14 |  #13

Noticed you had Image Editing OK turned on. So here is my take on it:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


All processing done in Lightroom.

Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:15 |  #14

I see a lot of you don't use a colour managed browser..


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
italianfemmy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Aug 05, 2007 13:18 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

Michael and Bryan - nice conversions.


Gear List - Rebel xTi; Kit Lens 18-55mm; Canon 75-300 mm f/5.6; 2 batteries; 8 GB of CF cards; Canon 430 EX flash, diffuser, lens hoods, couple Uv filters
17-55mm IS f/2.8 AND Canon 70-200L IS f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,038 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Arin & Brad - successful Lightroom use finally
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1709 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.