Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Aug 2007 (Saturday) 09:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Good exposure settings for handheld fireworks shots

 
waylandcool
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Aug 11, 2007 09:21 |  #1

I am going to the White Sox game tonight (leaving at 3:30 PM) and I'm going to try some handheld fireworks shots with my XTi. Bringing a tripod is impractical and I don't have a monopod (yet). Does anyone know of some exposure settings that I could start with so that this is not a waste of time? Thanks in advance




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Aug 11, 2007 09:27 |  #2

Set the camera to "M" mode. Set the ISO to 100. Set the aperture to f/11.

When you start the shoot, focus at infinity (focus on something several hundred yards away while you still have light) and turn AF (autofocus) OFF at the lens. Don't touch the focus ring on the lens from that time on.

Most exposures of fireworks are several seconds long. If you cannot hold the camera dead steady, you will wind up having all sorts of "squiggles" in the images of the bursts. That may or may not be a problem for you, but I wouldn't want to see that in my shots of fireworks.

I use a tripod, but with the head just loose enough to move the camera. I merely point it in the direction of the burst and hold the camera steady with my hand while holding the shutter release down for the duration of a burst (or series of bursts, depending on the show).


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Aug 11, 2007 09:43 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #3

I have shot fireworks before with a tripod and my Rebel but I've never done it handheld before. My shots were very hit and miss (mostly miss) with my HP P&S but my 3rd of July hand held shots with my Rebel were motion blurred beyond repair.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pturton
Senior Member
733 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Region Niagara, Ontario, Canada
     
Aug 11, 2007 10:13 |  #4

I'm not much for fireworks displays although I get dragged along to see some every year. Looking back over the past couple of years I see that I got best IQ at 35mm using f/2.8, 1/60, ISO 200, HH with AI Servo assigned to the * button. I'd watch the rocket ascend and try to time my shot to capture the burst as it approached its fullness. I do not take many image - just enough to keep my wife happy.

At fireworks distances, f/2.8 @ 35mm gives sufficient DOF and the AF worked well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Aug 11, 2007 10:16 |  #5

pturton wrote in post #3708170 (external link)
f/2.8, 1/60, ISO 200

Based on my experience, those settings would severely overexpose the fireworks in the sky. You might get halfway decent exposure of what's on the ground, but the burning stuff in the sky would be washed out.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Aug 11, 2007 11:47 |  #6

SkipD wrote in post #3708186 (external link)
Based on my experience, those settings would severely overexpose the fireworks in the sky. You might get halfway decent exposure of what's on the ground, but the burning stuff in the sky would be washed out.

Overexpose or underexpose???? 1/60th will underexpose the shot itself but you'll get the ground stuff decently.

My only handholding issue is that I usually use a 5 second exposure on a tripod and that would be a waste of time without a tripod. I'll probably start shooting at 1/4 sec. and adjust from there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dilorenzo1954
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,133 posts
Gallery: 210 photos
Likes: 1284
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Windy City
     
Aug 11, 2007 12:51 as a reply to  @ waylandcool's post |  #7

Probably a moot point, but I just called US Cellular Field and I was told that monopods are not allowed unless you have press credentials. They consider them potental weapons. I'm going to the game as well and thought about taking the 100-400 with the 1.4xTE (not for the fireworks)...I might still although the monopod would have been nice to have.


Ed

“A photograph is usually looked at- seldom looked into.” ~Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
487 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Aug 11, 2007 13:47 as a reply to  @ dilorenzo1954's post |  #8

Considering how diligent the security is at the Cell, I could get one in there anyway. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Aug 11, 2007 14:08 |  #9

waylandcool wrote in post #3708602 (external link)
Overexpose or underexpose???? 1/60th will underexpose the shot itself but you'll get the ground stuff decently.

For exposure, the shutter speed really makes no difference at all for the fireworks themselves except for how much of a burst you capture in one image.

The difference between fireworks (the aerial stuff) and ordinary photo exposures is that the elements in a fireworks burst are sources of light that are moving across the sky and thus across your film or digital sensor. Thus, shutter speed has much less to do with the exposure itself and more to do with how much of the burst the film/sensor can actually see. If you used a 3-second or a 30-second exposure for a single burst, you would probably have just about the same image from the sky. The longer your exposure, the more of the ground stuff you may see, but there won't be much difference from the sky.

Again, my tried and true exposure settings are 100 for the ISO setting (or film selection) and f/11 for the aperture. Some folks like to expose a little more and use f/8 at ISO 100, but I usually find that I get richer colors using f/11.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dilorenzo1954
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,133 posts
Gallery: 210 photos
Likes: 1284
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Windy City
     
Aug 11, 2007 14:08 |  #10

waylandcool wrote in post #3709136 (external link)
Considering how diligent the security is at the Cell, I could get one in there anyway. :lol:

I hear ya but I don't want to take the chance of losing it. I won't have a car to return it to as we are taking the "L"


Ed

“A photograph is usually looked at- seldom looked into.” ~Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pturton
Senior Member
733 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Region Niagara, Ontario, Canada
     
Aug 11, 2007 15:51 |  #11

SkipD wrote in post #3709209 (external link)
Again, my tried and true exposure settings are 100 for the ISO setting (or film selection) and f/11 for the aperture. Some folks like to expose a little more and use f/8 at ISO 100, but I usually find that I get richer colors using f/11.

The OP was talking about HandHeld exposures. You are talking about tripod exposures without mentioning your shutter speed.

What works for me obviously will not work for you. HH requires a shutter speed that helps prevent camera shake and for me, 1/60 second with a 35mm lens is about right at the end of a long day. But, I'll conceed, f/4 or smaller will also work at 1/60.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tel
Member
105 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Essex
     
Aug 11, 2007 16:54 |  #12

pturton wrote in post #3709630 (external link)
The OP was talking about HandHeld exposures. You are talking about tripod exposures without mentioning your shutter speed.

What works for me obviously will not work for you. HH requires a shutter speed that helps prevent camera shake and for me, 1/60 second with a 35mm lens is about right at the end of a long day. But, I'll conceed, f/4 or smaller will also work at 1/60.

I think what Skip is trying to point out is that the fireworks are so bright that using a wide aperture will cause the streaks to overexpose giving a bunch of white lines with a little colour on the edges. You'd be better off using f/8 of more at 1/60th, everything will be underexposed except for the fireworks which should be exposed pretty well containing plenty of colour without blowing the highlights. Not great but the best you'll get handheld no doubt.


Terry Cashman
flickr (external link)
_______________
30D - 300D - Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5 - Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 - Canon 50 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Aug 11, 2007 17:58 |  #13

pturton wrote in post #3709630 (external link)
The OP was talking about HandHeld exposures. You are talking about tripod exposures without mentioning your shutter speed.

What works for me obviously will not work for you. HH requires a shutter speed that helps prevent camera shake and for me, 1/60 second with a 35mm lens is about right at the end of a long day. But, I'll conceed, f/4 or smaller will also work at 1/60.

Exposure is exposure. There is no such thing as tripod or handheld exposure settings for fireworks. With fireworks (the actual burning part of the fireworks, not considering anything on the ground), it doesn't really matter what shutter speed you choose to use. Only the aperture setting will change the exposure of the burning fireworks.

If you use a shorter shutter speed like 1/60, you will get pretty much the same exposure for the image as with a much longer shutter speed (using the same aperture for both shutter speeds), but you won't see the whole burn of a shell like you would with the longer shutter speed.

f/4 at ISO 100 will guarantee overexposure of the fireworks. You will see an image, but the colors will be quite washed out as compared to setting the aperture at f/8 or f/11 (also at ISO 100, of course). Again, because of the nature of the subject, shutter speed is irrelevant for the exposure.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lani ­ Kai
"blissfully unaware"
Avatar
2,136 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
     
Aug 12, 2007 03:16 |  #14

pturton wrote in post #3708170 (external link)
I'm not much for fireworks displays although I get dragged along to see some every year. Looking back over the past couple of years I see that I got best IQ at 35mm using f/2.8, 1/60, ISO 200, HH with AI Servo assigned to the * button. I'd watch the rocket ascend and try to time my shot to capture the burst as it approached its fullness. I do not take many image - just enough to keep my wife happy.

At fireworks distances, f/2.8 @ 35mm gives sufficient DOF and the AF worked well.

I would just leave it in MF at infinity.


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Equipment list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dilorenzo1954
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,133 posts
Gallery: 210 photos
Likes: 1284
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Windy City
     
Aug 12, 2007 12:45 as a reply to  @ Lani Kai's post |  #15

This is the only semi-decent shot I got
100ISO
f/11
1.6 sec exposure
32mm
after 5 feeble attempts I just gave up and enjoyed the fireworks instead:p


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Ed

“A photograph is usually looked at- seldom looked into.” ~Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,858 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Good exposure settings for handheld fireworks shots
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1605 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.