Thank you Artur
I appreciate it.... Take care
Excellent, all of them! Lighting is perfect IMO.
Aug 13, 2007 06:12 | #16 Thank you Artur zman wrote in post #3717261 Excellent, all of them! Lighting is perfect IMO. "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Viky Senior Member 361 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: India More info | Wow! Amazing Pics.... all of them!!! You first see a photo with your mind, and then capture it with your camera!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 13, 2007 10:23 | #18 It will be a pleasure Viky... I checked out your works, and you have the potential to be a "Hi Mag Macro God" "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 13, 2007 17:42 | #19 Hi Trevor... What I will suggest is start with your 100-300 at 100mm for a milder more manageable mag to start with 2:1 is still way cool.. Be sure 50 is set wide open and set to infinity focus.. Set your main lens to f16 to f22 this will increase your DOF for a little easier focusing.... Finding the bug wide open and hitting focus with so little DOF would be very difficult.. Start with something stationary to get the feel for it... Anything on a table or counter top will help you get used to the approx working distance and help get you adjusting to how thin the DOF is.... That is where I started getting good practice adjusting to the rig... Keep in mind again your working distance will be under and inch, and focus will be achieved by moving the lens closer too or further away from the subject... Be sure all auto focus features of both lenses are shut down, and forget the focusing rings once set.... Once you get comfortable with this, you will need to get the flash directed right at the end of the lens for good results with the shots... Brian showed an example of a sweet yet simple solution... With external flash mounted to the hot shoe take a piece of paper and form it to attach with tape to the flash unit and be sure to have the paper funneling the light out to the end of the lens, in a slight downward angle from flash to lens.... Cut or end the paper no more than an inch or so past the lens.... This helps soften the light and put it out where it needs to be.... With under an inch of working distance a conventional flash won't squeek in where it needs to be... And the images will usually be far to underexposed without use of a flash...I personally start my camera settings at ISO 200, shutter to 1/320, camera set in manual mode... Flash set to manual high speed sync, and I dial down the EV to 1/4 this is usually close to right, I then fine tune from there.. Usually changing shutter speed by one value up or down.. Viky..... I would like to add this last bit of advice to you to bring out your shots a little more... Lighting the subject with mainly backlighting won't work nearly as effectively when it comes to detail of the bug without blowing out the highlights. It takes the directed light to bring out the detail once again because of the small working distance and the inability for the light to get where it needs to be.. Natural light rarely works with the reversed 50 set up.... I looked at your exif data and as near as I can tell you have everything else dialed in, nicely.... Good luck guys... I hope this was a help... bromm wrote in post #3715862 Hey Alex, just for the fun of it, I mounterd my tamron 100-300, and tried handholding my kit lens reversed in front of it, I couldnt find a focal point at all, everything was blurred no matter what I tired. I set the kit lens to wide open and also the 100-300, still puzzled. I was quite interested in the " more light to focus" point you mentioned, that would be a great help! any ideas what I might be doing wrong? "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bromm Cream of the Crop 6,920 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada More info | Thanks Alex, thats a detailed explanation. I forgot about the need for an off camera flash, not really thinking on the physical length of the two lens setup. Since I only have the on camera flash right now, I'll have to wait(saving for a tele prime). The small working distance was a surprise as with my current setup, set at 55mm I have about 6-8 inches, maybe a little more, at 30mm( the most I can zoom in using the onboard flash) the working distance is about 3-3 1/2 inches. However the thought of having more light to focus has me intrigued. Thanks again Alex, I'll give it a try after I make an adapter to join the two lenses. thanks bud! Trevor Wadman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 13, 2007 21:08 | #21 You're welcome brother... Take care.... bromm wrote in post #3722262 Thanks Alex, thats a detailed explanation. I forgot about the need for an off camera flash, not really thinking on the physical length of the two lens setup. Since I only have the on camera flash right now, I'll have to wait(saving for a tele prime). The small working distance was a surprise as with my current setup, set at 55mm I have about 6-8 inches, maybe a little more, at 30mm( the most I can zoom in using the onboard flash) the working distance is about 3-3 1/2 inches. However the thought of having more light to focus has me intrigued. Thanks again Alex, I'll give it a try after I make an adapter to join the two lenses. thanks bud! "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Aug 13, 2007 21:11 | #22 OH MY GOSH.. i have never seen anything like that before. that is crazy. is it heavy?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LordV Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006 More info | Aug 14, 2007 01:06 | #23 Good series Alex http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 14, 2007 06:49 | #24 Hi Shannon shannyD wrote in post #3722779 OH MY GOSH.. i have never seen anything like that before. that is crazy. is it heavy? "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 14, 2007 06:50 | #25 Thanks Brian LordV wrote in post #3723834 Good series Alex - not mad on the flower but the lizards make up for it ![]() Brian V. "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lcpete Goldmember 1,999 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: North Wales More info | Aug 14, 2007 06:56 | #26 Hi Alex great seies of shots my favourites are the Anole lizards great subject for macro as they are quite tiny Canon 40D, 350D, 550D and 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 14, 2007 13:28 | #27 Hi there Pete lcpete wrote in post #3724576 Hi Alex great seies of shots my favourites are the Anole lizards great subject for macro as they are quite tiny Pete "If I had any pride I'd be ashamed of myself"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2552 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||