Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Aug 2007 (Sunday) 02:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

"Upgrade" from "L" to Sigma 120-300?

 
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Aug 28, 2007 11:29 |  #16

I'm thinking the 120-300 2.8 would be idea for LL baseball, and other sports. I just don't know if I would want to sell my 100-300mm f/4 to get it. While I use a monopod, I can handhold the f/4. And I don't know if I would like giving up 20mm on the wide end.

But I would not buy it for the reasons the OP gave.


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Aug 28, 2007 11:57 |  #17

I dont understand why not keep the 400 and use a TC with it instead of a shorter lens, if reach is what you are after?


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Aug 28, 2007 12:06 |  #18

not only a shorter lens but one that weighs twice as much and doesn't have IS. ugh .

The lens he has doesn't have IS either.

As to some of the other comments above that the larger sigma zoom can't hang with the Canon 300 f2.8, not so. The L is better, but oh so marginally. Where I have notice a difference is in build quality. My Siggy is about two years old with very regular use in commercial sports work. It is absolutely showing signs of wear. The coating is starting to come off, and I have to tighten up the lens about once a month. The weight of a 1D hanging off of make the mount come loose over time. Very easy to fix, but a hassle none-the-less. I would say my 500 L is showing some of the same signs of wear on it's coating, but it has remained very tight.

I am a little surprise at Cecil's comments that Canon lenses are a fore-ever investment. This is far from the case. Ask anyone with a mk I 400 f2.8 like I did, or one of the 200 f1.8 if Canon will service those. Not a chance. Yes they hold their value... but honestly any good lens does. I have seen used 120-300 Sigma selling used for more then I bought mine for new.

Now back to the OP's plight. If your primary goal is to use the lens with a TC all the time, you might find yourself disappointed. Unless your shooting with a 1 series body, focus reliability is going to go to hell. I think the body used with has a huge impact on the users experience with the lens. On my 20D in the dark, the siggy is a sluggish and will hunt. Same conditions on the 1d bodies.... it's a very happy camper. I shoot in fact a lot of indoor sports with it without issue. The 20/30d just doesn't have a sensitive enough AF system to play nicely in those conditions.

I would recommend looking for a used big Siggy or Cannon. You should be able to find a used Siggy 500 f4.5 out there for under 3K. The Canon can be had for a bit more. Good luck with your quest.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shtang8
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
     
Aug 28, 2007 12:28 |  #19

I had the same idea as fritz1 but he beat me to it. You should keep your 400 since you love it. Might as well get an extender on you 400 instead of getting a new Sigma.


Stephen

Equipment: 40D, Sigma 18-200mm OS, Canon 100mm Macro, Canon 10-22mm, Canon 70-200mmL, Canon 100-400mmL IS. Zessis (with adatpter): Planar 80mm, Vario Sonnar 80-200mm, Tessar 45mm and Distagon 25mm. Canon G9 :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,067 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
"Upgrade" from "L" to Sigma 120-300?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
709 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.