Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 12 Aug 2007 (Sunday) 17:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon 500 vs. 600 (again)

 
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
Avatar
8,405 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Aug 12, 2007 17:45 |  #1

looks like my 500 is now sold (i am doing a favor to a friend and selling him mine when i go back home) so when i get back in 3 weeks, i will have the cash in hand to pick up a new 500mm F4. not sure why, but i have been thinking about maybe picking up a 600F4 instead. i would like to hear the opinions from people like morehtml, peteparker and all the other people that had a chance to use them both. i know all about the weight difference between the two but i also know that i have shot my 500mm handheld exactly one time and have no plans of doing that again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Aug 12, 2007 18:19 |  #2

Yea I have both. For birds if I plan on taking any handheld flight shots OR if I'm traveling on a plane I take the 500. Otherwise I almost always take the 600 90 percent of the time for birds.

If I'm shooting bigger wildlife I take the 600 and 300 2.8 if by car and the 300 and 500 if by air.

The 600 makes 44% more pixels on your target.

AF speed and sharpness is pretty much the same between the 2. 500 is VERY slightly sharper, not enough to sweat over. The 500 is easier to get sharp shots because you don't have as much focal length to worry about but with good technique the 600 works just as well.

600 is harder to shoot out car window but I still do it all the time and use a kirk window mount.

Most of the animals I shoot even deer, bear, etc the 600 is usually used if I go by car.

I can still handhold the 600 if need be.

As far as weight:

Here's my rig

1 Series - 2.56 Ib
Gitzo 1325 - 4.5 Ib
Wimbeley II - 3.15 Ib
Flash & Bracket + Batt pack & Batteries - estimated 3 Ib
Add 500/600 Lens - 8.5/11.8

As you can see the whole setup is

21.7 Ib with 500mm and
25 Ib with 600mm or 15% heavier which isn't the end of the world

In real world use you notice the bulky factor more.


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
Avatar
8,405 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Aug 12, 2007 18:22 |  #3

wow, just what i was looking for Allen!! you even listed my entire rig specs so that is even better (we use the exact same setup)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Aug 12, 2007 18:36 |  #4

blonde wrote in post #3715476 (external link)
wow, just what i was looking for Allen!! you even listed my entire rig specs so that is even better (we use the exact same setup)

Cool if you need to see any side by side shots of the 300/500/600 or cases that are not covered on http://www.the-digital-picture.com …L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx (external link)

then let me know


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
Avatar
8,405 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Aug 12, 2007 18:37 |  #5

actually, if you can post a few of the two of them laying on the floor side by side that would be great. also, what do you use for a bag for the 600 and can i see it in the bag compared to the 500?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Aug 12, 2007 19:05 |  #6

Luky for you it's so hot I can't go out and shoot anything this afternoon because of the heat :lol:

IMAGE: http://www.allensvisions.com/pics/IMG_5712w.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.allensvisions.com/pics/IMG_5713w.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.allensvisions.com/pics/IMG_5714w.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.allensvisions.com/pics/IMG_5715w.jpg

Kinesis Bags. A little deceptive because the 600 bag will hold the lens + cam attached and the 500 will only hold the lens. While taking this picture though I toyed with it a bit and i think without the hood the 600 will actually fit in the 500 bag and I could pack the lens hood in a checked bag to fly if need be.
IMAGE: http://www.allensvisions.com/pics/IMG_5716w.jpg

---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
Avatar
8,405 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Aug 12, 2007 19:37 |  #7

holy crap that is a huge difference!!! i think that i am going to stick with the 500 :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarklin
Senior Member
545 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2006
Location: People's Republik of Kalifornia
     
Aug 12, 2007 20:07 |  #8

blonde wrote in post #3715863 (external link)
holy crap that is a huge difference!!! i think that i am going to stick with the 500 :)

Blonde,

Thanks for starting this thread. I'm going for wildlife in NoCal soon, and have wanted a large prime for a little while now. No matter what I do my 1-400 dosn't reach out far enough even with T/C (and I lose autofocus too). I'm assuming my T/C will still allow autofocus with either of these two lenses.

Any way the info here is very pertintent to my decision.

BTW, I like Blonde's reviews.:cool:


Canon EOS 5D also Mk III, 24-70L, 85 IIL, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L, 180 Macro L, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, 100-400 L IS, 8-15 L Fisheye f/4, 16-35 L, 50 L , TS-E 24 L, 600 L, Extender 1.4X & 2X II, Speedlite 580EX x 2, MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite, ST-E2, Angle Finder C, RS-80N3 Remote Switch, Focusing Screen EE-D, BG-E4, Manfrotto 458B Neotec tripodw/Acratech 1155 GP Ballhead.:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Aug 12, 2007 20:56 |  #9

Thanks for the reference, wasn't sure I put the lens coat on right :eek:


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
Avatar
2,158 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
     
Aug 12, 2007 22:54 as a reply to  @ calicokat's post |  #10

I use both regularly for sport, but I rarely shoot wildlife.

On larger football (AFL)/cricket fields I favour the 600/4 IS, but I prefer using the 500/4 IS on smaller fields as it is easier to acquire and frame moving targets.

For motorsport I prefer the 500/4 IS due to the fact that I spend all day walking around and the weight penalty of the 600/4 IS is higher, but for motorcycles I will normally put up with the weight and go for the 600/4 IS as the subjects are smaller and the races are shorter.

Sharpness is a dead heat from what I can tell. Both take TCs very well.

If I could only have one I would favour the 600/4 IS.


EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 300/2.8 IS II | 400/2.8 IS II | 500/4 IS II | 600/4 IS II | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 11-24/4 | 16-35/2.8 III | 24-70/2.8 II | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS II | 200-400/4 IS 1.4x
Sundry: 600EX II-RT | 1.4x III | 2x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarklin
Senior Member
545 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2006
Location: People's Republik of Kalifornia
     
Aug 13, 2007 00:15 as a reply to  @ cwphoto's post |  #11

cwphoto,

I'm coming around to your way of thinking.


Canon EOS 5D also Mk III, 24-70L, 85 IIL, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L, 180 Macro L, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, 100-400 L IS, 8-15 L Fisheye f/4, 16-35 L, 50 L , TS-E 24 L, 600 L, Extender 1.4X & 2X II, Speedlite 580EX x 2, MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite, ST-E2, Angle Finder C, RS-80N3 Remote Switch, Focusing Screen EE-D, BG-E4, Manfrotto 458B Neotec tripodw/Acratech 1155 GP Ballhead.:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,766 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 301
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Aug 13, 2007 09:04 as a reply to  @ mrmarklin's post |  #12

I was asking about that many times here or on some forums, even blonde himself posted that he prefers 500, and i think he shouldn't change what he preferred, always he prefers something then after a while of usage he wants to try something new.
I will go direct for 600, just spending my vacation now and when back i will start to save for 600, not looking for handholding heavy lenses even that 300 which is the lighter than the others.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,394 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4501
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 13, 2007 09:55 |  #13

Yes, it is imperative that we never change our minds.. ???


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JC4
Goldmember
Avatar
2,610 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Aug 13, 2007 09:56 as a reply to  @ Tareq's post |  #14

Good thread.

I just sold my 300 f/2.8, and was starting to research my next long lens. Those pictures of 500 vs 600 are excellent. The spec differences don't look as significant as the actual lenses side-by-side. That 600 is huge!

I'd like to see a DO version of the 600. I know it wouldn't accept TCs as well, but it might make a nice size/weight package. And would probably be fine at 600mm or 840mm. On the other hand, the price might be a bit scary (more so than the current 600).

Sigma doesn't make anything in these lengths with OS, do they? I think I'd love their 300-800 with OS, since my Zooms always seem to get the most usage.

Oh well. Thanks for getting this tread started. Glad to see the comparison between these two.

JohnC


John Caputo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
busterboy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,437 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire Born n Bred.
     
Aug 13, 2007 11:04 |  #15

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #3719005 (external link)
Yes, it is imperative that we never change our minds.. ???

:lol::lol::lol:
---------------

Great thread BTW..:D

Cannot add anything to your thread Snir and you don't need telling how good both these giant lenses are..;)

Good luck with whatever you choose..:)


[COLOR=blue][COLOR=bla​ck][COLOR=blue]| Canon 1DMkIII | 16-35mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm F/2.8L IS | Canon 1.4X Extender | Canon 2X Extender |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

7,292 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 500 vs. 600 (again)
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is jaggerkat
451 guests, 285 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.