Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Aug 2007 (Monday) 06:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24-70mm and canon battery grip ?? IS IT SAFE? ?

 
EOS ­ MAN1
Senior Member
Avatar
655 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Aug 13, 2007 06:55 |  #1

I just got the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L and the 17-40mm f/4L and a Canon battery grip. The 24-70 is absolutely massive in weight. I always thought everone was joking about how heavy it is. I am going to have to work out my arms just to use this thing on a regular basis.

Anyway, with how heavy the lens is, is it safe to have the grip on with it and attach it to a tripod. I am worried that the extra weight will put some serious stress on the grip. I just don't want another grip issue like what happened to my Targus grip.


BERNARD BRZEZINSKI
- Photography & Consulting Services
- http://www.bernardbrze​zinski.comexternal link | contact: nfo@bernardbrzezinski.​com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Beck
Goldmember
2,503 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:08 |  #2

It is fine. It really is not that heavy. If canon thought it wasn't safe to mount the camera on a tripod they would have put a tripod ring on the lens to mount that to the tripod instead of the body.


Gear List? My gear is bigger than yours? Just shoot have fun...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jethro790
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Southern New Hampshire
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:11 as a reply to  @ Steve Beck's post |  #3

As Steve said, you shouldn't mount the battery grip on the tripod, but use the mount ring on the lens. The camera gets supported by the lens, which is no issue.


If you must know...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:22 |  #4

Seem this set up many times, not a problem. Yes, always mount the lens, not the battery grip.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:43 |  #5

Jethro790 wrote in post #3718605 (external link)
As Steve said, you shouldn't mount the battery grip on the tripod, but use the mount ring on the lens. The camera gets supported by the lens, which is no issue.

The 24-70 has no tripod ring, so that option isn't available.

Nevertheless, it's fine to mount the camera on the tripod with that lens while using the grip, though there is a very slight amount of play in that setup as compared to just mounting it on the bare body bottom (say that fast 3 times) of the camera.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:45 |  #6

There's no issue mounting a 24-70L on a tripod with a gripped body. Just make sure you have a decent tripod, and there's nothing to worry about.

I've mounted a 24-70L on a gripped XT, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMkII, and 1DMkIIN (the 1's are a given). No problems.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommy
I have a Peepster.
Avatar
2,262 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Cleona, PA
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:47 |  #7

The 24-70 doesn't have a ring.... just mount it to the tripod using the bottom of the grip. Just make sure you have a quality tripod that can support the weight.

And if you think that's heavy, just wait till you get the 70-200 f/2.8L IS! :D


Tommy
_______________
"Vision without execution is hallucination" - Thomas Edison (1847-1931)
MySpace (external link)| Facebook (external link) | ModelMayhem (external link) | Blog (external link) | Central PA Wedding and Senior Photographer (external link) | Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brikwall
Senior Member
840 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlantic Canada
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:53 |  #8

The 24-70 does NOT have a tripod ring, so the statements about mounting the lens to a tripod instead of the grip are, in this case, irrelevant.

I've used my 24-70 and gripped Rebel XT on a tripod. There is no problem attaching the battery grip to the tripod. Yes, the set-up is a little front-heavy but it's nothing to be worried about. It does not put any undue stress on the grip, at least not that I can see. My only concern was ensuring that my tripod/head combination was strong enough and sturdy enough to handle the weight and eliminate any potential for camera shake from the wind or from people/cars passing nearby.

The weight of the 24-70 is relative...my primary walkaround lens is the 70-200mm f/2.8L, which weighs about a pound more (1310 grams vs 950 grams for the 24-70mm f/2.8L). You'll get used to it, and the grip will help to balance the weight.


Dan
Some gear, some experience, and no talent.
Web: http://www.macdonald-photography.com (external link) | http://ambientlight.ze​nfolio.com (external link) |
http://danmacdonald.50​0px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Beck
Goldmember
2,503 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
     
Aug 13, 2007 08:58 |  #9

I was saying the 24-70 doesnt have a ring hehe, maybe i got my wording all screwy hehe.


Gear List? My gear is bigger than yours? Just shoot have fun...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brikwall
Senior Member
840 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlantic Canada
     
Aug 13, 2007 10:29 |  #10

Your wording was fine, it was the interpretation of it by the two subsequent posters that was...off...

No biggie, though, on anyone's part. If none of us had simple misunderstandings like that politicians would soon be out of work (although that might not be a bad thing...)


Dan
Some gear, some experience, and no talent.
Web: http://www.macdonald-photography.com (external link) | http://ambientlight.ze​nfolio.com (external link) |
http://danmacdonald.50​0px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS ­ MAN1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
655 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Aug 13, 2007 14:40 |  #11

Thanx guys, you've made me feel much better. No Worries.


BERNARD BRZEZINSKI
- Photography & Consulting Services
- http://www.bernardbrze​zinski.comexternal link | contact: nfo@bernardbrzezinski.​com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 14, 2007 12:50 |  #12

Sorry, you guys were right. I was thinking of the 70-200, which does have a ring. :)

I was just playing around with Dave's 5D and 24-70 on a Custom Bracket the other day. He had the 550 attached and the grip on the 5D. I was amazed at the weight of it, but it sure was a nice set up.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Aug 14, 2007 13:22 |  #13

SuzyView wrote in post #3726541 (external link)
Sorry, you guys were right. I was thinking of the 70-200, which does have a ring. :)

I was just playing around with Dave's 5D and 24-70 on a Custom Bracket the other day. He had the 550 attached and the grip on the 5D. I was amazed at the weight of it, but it sure was a nice set up.

Well I'll be darned. Dave and I think alike. That's my wedding rig! :eek:


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BBrat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,601 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: West of Boston, MA. USA
     
Aug 14, 2007 15:23 |  #14

TomC723 wrote in post #3718704 (external link)
The 24-70 doesn't have a ring.... just mount it to the tripod using the bottom of the grip. Just make sure you have a quality tripod that can support the weight.

And if you think that's heavy, just wait till you get the 70-200 f/2.8L IS! :D

i was thinking the same thing....:)


Brian Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 14, 2007 16:10 |  #15

Even though that set-up is very heavy, I am going to get the custom bracket sometime this fall. I have to work out for about a month, though. Love you Ronald!


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,005 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
24-70mm and canon battery grip ?? IS IT SAFE? ?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1469 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.