Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Aug 2007 (Tuesday) 03:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CMOS vs CCD

 
aditya73
Member
Avatar
47 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Dubai
     
Aug 14, 2007 03:27 |  #1

whats your take on CMOS vs CCD. i was reading up on it and found that CMOS leads to faster processing but the picture quality will be less when compared to a CCD.
further i found most canon cameras including the mark iii to be based on CMOS while nikon is using CCD.
is this a huge difference or am i just naive?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dfindr
Senior Member
Avatar
676 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
     
Aug 14, 2007 05:07 |  #2

aditya73 wrote in post #3724127 (external link)
whats your take on CMOS vs CCD. i was reading up on it and found that CMOS leads to faster processing but the picture quality will be less when compared to a CCD.
further i found most canon cameras including the mark iii to be based on CMOS while nikon is using CCD.
is this a huge difference or am i just naive?

Classic 1D, there is no substitute, 'nuff said.


DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear!
Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
motion_projekt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,469 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Aug 14, 2007 05:37 |  #3

yay 1D Classic!

CCD does suck up teh battery power though.


EOS 5Dmk3x2 | 24L | 50L | 135L
Instagram (external link) | Gear | SportsShooter (external link) | Portfolio (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Aug 14, 2007 07:13 |  #4

Take a look at the 1DmkII and on and all the 1Ds cameras. Then compare them to all the other CCD cameras out there. Nuff said, too! ;)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adas
Goldmember
Avatar
1,496 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2004
     
Aug 14, 2007 07:20 |  #5

CCD's don't have the edge anymore.


6D, 20D, G7X

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,550 posts
Gallery: 212 photos
Likes: 395
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Aug 14, 2007 07:31 |  #6

I read up on the differences prior to buying and decided on the CMOS over CCD which I guess is why I have Canon and not Nikon.


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Aug 14, 2007 07:48 as a reply to  @ Desertraptor's post |  #7

If others are interested; some background: http://electronics.how​stuffworks.com/questio​n362.htm (external link)


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Aug 14, 2007 10:13 |  #8

that little article is quite old... cmos chips now have the advantage in sensitivity because of how the amplifiers work (less lossy than the ccd type), and microlenses used today solved most of the other problems. while it is true that ccd will give you a better image quality (base ISO mind you), the only way to actually notice it in your photos is to chill both chips to well below freezing (cold ccd sensors work better than hot ones). Hell, the only thing that hasn't changed now is the better battery life, doubt any d50 (non i know of, and i do know two d50 users) gets 1k shots with an IS lens on one battery (2500 on two)

as for the 1d classic vs all newer dslr canons, reason for 1d being sharper is because it has no AA filter in front of the sensor.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
Aug 14, 2007 10:40 |  #9

aditya73 wrote in post #3724127 (external link)
further i found most canon cameras including the mark iii to be based on CMOS while nikon is using CCD.
is this a huge difference or am i just naive?

I believe Nikon uses a CMOS sensor in their best DSLR, the D2Xs, if that means anything.

I assume that they would choose the best technology available for their top of the line model.

Scott




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dustyporch
Senior Member
398 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2007
     
Aug 14, 2007 11:02 as a reply to  @ ScottE's post |  #10

Personally, I don't care is the sensor is a little bird with a chisel and a stone tablet....

Sensor technology is irrelevant. The photos that come out are what matters, and Canon has found a way to make CMOS work. When Canon finds a better technology, you can bet that CMOS will get the boot.


My photos on Flickr... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 14, 2007 11:07 |  #11

ScottE wrote in post #3725796 (external link)
I assume that they would choose the best technology available for their top of the line model.

Scott

So Canon chose CMOS for their top of the line models (all but one). I would assume that Canon chose the best technology available.

Shoot at ISO 3200 on a 1D Mk.II and a D200. See what the best technology is.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dfindr
Senior Member
Avatar
676 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
     
Aug 14, 2007 11:44 |  #12

cosworth wrote in post #3725927 (external link)
So Canon chose CMOS for their top of the line models (all but one). I would assume that Canon chose the best technology available.

Shoot at ISO 3200 on a 1D Mk.II and a D200. See what the best technology is.

I am a 1d Classic fanatic x 2. I also have a 1DKII as well as a 5D and 30D, also a 300 D, G6 and Pro1. There is a tool for every job. Shooting high ISO as Cosworth suggests requires the right tool. The 1D Classic aint it. The 5D is. Thank goodness we are not limited to only one camera. However, for everday shooting, and some studio stuff [1/500 sync] the 1D Classic is hard to beat. The 1D Classic is an outstanding macro camera as well, slap a 180 3.5 L or a MP-E on it with a 24EX, and a macro rail, and wow.


DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear!
Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 14, 2007 11:53 |  #13

I've had some experience with a 1D... I was constantly amazed at how blown the red channel would get under nearly every circumstance. I'm even aware of it with my 1Ds cameras, the red channel has to be tip toed around.

Great cameras though. Mind you 100 years from now people will wonder how we survived with such equipment.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 14, 2007 13:17 |  #14

CMOS all the way. Nikon had to go CMOS for a 12 MOP camera, CCD just can't scale efficiently.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
Aug 14, 2007 22:35 |  #15

cosworth wrote in post #3725927 (external link)
So Canon chose CMOS for their top of the line models (all but one). I would assume that Canon chose the best technology available.

Which current Canon camera does not use a CMOS sensor? The way Canon promotes CMOS I thought they had given up on CCD.

Scott




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,600 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
CMOS vs CCD
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1734 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.