Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Jul 2004 (Thursday) 10:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Adjusting exposure in post processing

 
tracyh
Member
46 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Jul 01, 2004 10:30 |  #1

I generally shoot large JPEGs rather than RAW, since I've not taken the time to investigate the RAW converters, etc. My question is, though... when I have a shot that's underexposed, I can do some fixing up of that in PS7. I know you can adjust exposure on RAW files... I'm just wondering if there's an advantage with doing this on a RAW file vs. using levels in PS on a JPEG file. Since I struggle with underexposed shots I take with my 550 flash, I'm wondering if it would be to my advantage to shoot RAW... or if I'd get the same basic result as adjusting with levels in PS.
Thanks, Holly




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Jul 01, 2004 12:06 |  #2

You should be able to get close to proper exposure with your 550EX, whether RAW or JPEG file format. If you shoot RAW, you have a little more room to play with in conversion to JPEG or TIF. If you shoot JPEG, you can still fix it up a little, but it depends on how badly exposed it was.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracyh
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
46 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Jul 01, 2004 12:30 |  #3

Yea... perhaps I'm blaming things on the 550 when I shouldn't be. The issue really seems to occur when I'm shooting a portrait with a white background. The subject exposure it's actually pretty decent, but the background is under-exposed... although I feel like I'm lighting it sufficiently (and perhaps it just needs more light). I end up getting kind of an orange cast on the background. That's when I have to screw around with it in PS. I was just wondering whether adjusting exposure levels in post-processing on a RAW file would produce better results than adjusting levels in PS on a JPEG file.

Obviously, I need to work on getting the exposure right out of the camera. This is just an interim solution until I figure out what I'm doing wrong. If you have any ideas on that (getting it right in the first place), I'd love to hear 'em. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Jul 01, 2004 12:43 |  #4

tracyh wrote:
Yea... perhaps I'm blaming things on the 550 when I shouldn't be.

It's always easiest for us to blame the hardware. However, the really smart shooters will learn all of the potential weaknesses of their system and develop work-arounds to minimize the problem.

tracyh wrote:
The issue really seems to occur when I'm shooting a portrait with a white background. The subject exposure it's actually pretty decent, but the background is under-exposed... although I feel like I'm lighting it sufficiently (and perhaps it just needs more light). I end up getting kind of an orange cast on the background.

First of all, for your portrait shot, what camera mode are you using (e.g. Av)? What metering mode? What color balance setting?

Orange cast tends to be "tungsten glow" which comes from ordinary incandescent light bulbs. So, if you have a mixture of good flash light from your 550EX, and bad orange light from ambient lighting, then what should you do to cut out the bad part? Think about that for a second, or else think about it the other way around. Theoretically, if you wanted to increase the effect of ambient orange lighting, what would you do?

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracyh
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
46 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Jul 01, 2004 12:50 |  #5

Sorry. Forgot to mention that I'm using Program mode. My next step was to play around with Av or Manual mode to see if the metering would expose more for the background, allowing the flash to light accordingly.

Concerning the background lighting--- I'm using regular incandescent bulbs in some clip-on work lights, but they're the "daylight" bulbs. Have you heard of those? I was hoping that would help the situation. I believe they're 100-150 watts each (I'm not near them to check it). I must admit that I'm a little fuzzy on the different light types (tungsten vs. incandescent, etc.). Do you have some suggestions on something I could use for contiuous lighting on the background?

Thanks again for all your help...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yb98
Goldmember
Avatar
2,625 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Paris
     
Jul 01, 2004 13:23 |  #6

tracyh wrote:
I generally shoot large JPEGs rather than RAW, since I've not taken the time to investigate the RAW converters, etc. My question is, though... when I have a shot that's underexposed, I can do some fixing up of that in PS7. I know you can adjust exposure on RAW files... I'm just wondering if there's an advantage with doing this on a RAW file vs. using levels in PS on a JPEG file. Since I struggle with underexposed shots I take with my 550 flash, I'm wondering if it would be to my advantage to shoot RAW... or if I'd get the same basic result as adjusting with levels in PS.
Thanks, Holly

Shoot in raw. If you are not convinced look here:
https://photography-on-the.net …ad.php?t=24713&​highlight=


Best DPP Threads
DPP++ Video Channel (external link)
New Version DPP++ 11.3 released (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jul 01, 2004 13:53 |  #7

I have to agree with the others.

1) Find workarounds for crazy equipment.
2) Shoot in RAW
3) If necessary, fall back to Photoshop: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=35041


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jul 02, 2004 12:40 |  #8

FYI, It's better to slightly overexpose in raw then to underexpose. Side by side comparisons of images shot slightly under vs. slightly over exposed show the recovered overexposed ones come out better. That is because so much more data is captured in the right side of the histogram(Expose to the Right at www.luminous-landscape.com (external link) ).

Secondly, an easy way to to get a bright white backgroud is to buy a small battery operated digital slave flash.
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …home?O=NavBar&A​=search&Q= (external link)
I use (2) Morris Mini Slaves and (2) Mini Slave Wides. You can drop the Wides in corners of a dark room so that it lights up the whole room. The Mini's are directional. You can put it on the floor and point it at the background.
Put the 550EX on Manual and use the distance scale to adjust the f stop. Use FEC to adjust the 550EX based on the histogram.
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jul 04, 2004 08:44 |  #9

Holly:

To control the exposure of your background you need to switch to manual mode. When working with a combination of continuous light and flash, the exposure for flash is controlled with the aperture, and continuous source is controlled by varying the shutter speed. To make the background lighter in relation to the flash exposure use a shutter speed one or two steps slower than the camera would select in the program mode. Review a couple or three test shots until you nail the right combination of speed and aperture.

Charles




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,102 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Adjusting exposure in post processing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1754 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.