| POLL: "Which 400mm" |
100-400mm 5.6 l | 7 21.9% |
400mm 5,6 l | 12 37.5% |
70-200mm 2.8 l + 2x | 13 40.6% |
mikeassk Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Aug 17, 2007 16:28 | #1 |
Dandaman_24 Senior Member 935 posts Joined Dec 2004 Location: S Wales UK More info | Aug 17, 2007 17:21 | #2 100-400 F5.6 for me multifinctional lens then Canon 1DMKIIN - 1D - 17-35mm - 24 -70mm - 70-200mm - 580EX - Macbook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SurfKahakai Goldmember 1,158 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Prescott, AZ More info | Aug 17, 2007 20:41 | #3 Are you asking which one we think the shot was taken with or which one you should buy? Prescott, AZ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Aug 17, 2007 21:03 | #4 SurfKahakai wrote in post #3747232 Are you asking which one we think the shot was taken with or which one you should buy? YES!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 17, 2007 22:45 | #5 well I am going with 70-200 since it's the only one of the 3 listed in your sig. Could be your reverse psychology though. 5D Mk IV | 24-105L | 85 1.8 | 70-200L 2.8 IS MkII | 100-400L MkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SurfKahakai Goldmember 1,158 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Prescott, AZ More info | Aug 18, 2007 00:39 | #6 |
mikeassk THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Aug 18, 2007 00:47 | #7 carpenter wrote in post #3747818 well I am going with 70-200 since it's the only one of the 3 listed in your sig. Could be your reverse psychology though. ![]() Yup.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SilverOnemi Senior Member 692 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Portugal More info | Aug 18, 2007 17:06 | #8 hmm that boosts me into buying an TC awesome shot, i kinda wished i lived near the beach. gripped 7D/40D | 70-200 F4 L IS | 50 1.4 USM | wigma 10 20 | tamron 17 50 | canon 1.4 TC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Aug 19, 2007 00:41 | #9 SilverOnemi wrote in post #3751177 hmm that boosts me into buying an TC awesome shot, i kinda wished i lived near the beach. anyway which 70 200 is that ? canon 2.8 ? Yes. Canon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcw122 Goldmember 1,940 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: West Chester, PA More info | Aug 19, 2007 01:27 | #10 Can you even use those lenses at 400mm with dark scenes like that? "Ill show you."-John Hammond
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Aug 19, 2007 12:14 | #11 jcw122 wrote in post #3753028 Can you even use those lenses at 400mm with dark scenes like that? At 800 or 1600 iso and a tripod you can
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1052 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||