Straight from the camera, only resize and save for web.
1/125s, f11, iso400-214mm Handheld and manual focus.
jackprks Goldmember 1,299 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Michigan City, IN More info | Aug 22, 2007 19:31 | #1 Straight from the camera, only resize and save for web. JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/parksplace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rw2 Goldmember 4,201 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: North Dakota More info | Aug 22, 2007 20:41 | #2 The back area of the flower that is blurry is to distracting. Usually if you can get your shutter speed higher than your focal length. Here it would have been nice to have your shutter speed higher than the 214mm. Unless you have image stabilization. This will cut down on motion blur. With the settings you had you needed a tripod. If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 23, 2007 07:25 | #3 rw2, unfortunatley this was something that I saw early in the morning waiting for my lawyers office to open. I noticed the flower and grabbed my camera and shot. How do you tell that it is motion blur and not oof? JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/parksplace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rw2 Goldmember 4,201 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: North Dakota More info | Aug 23, 2007 12:34 | #4 It is probably some of both. So to get the sharpest picture you need to eliminate the motion. You can do that by increasing your shutter speed. In your case it would be hard to do with low light unless you used a flash. If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 23, 2007 12:47 | #5 I just bought a Sigma DG 500 Super. I haven't gotten batteries for it yet but when I do, I will give it a try. JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/parksplace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rw2 Goldmember 4,201 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: North Dakota More info | Aug 23, 2007 18:02 | #6 That f11 should give you a better depth of field but will also require either more light or slower shutter speed. If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rw2 Goldmember 4,201 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: North Dakota More info | Aug 23, 2007 19:08 | #7 I tried to duplicate your conditions. 1/125, ISO 400, f11, focal length 210mm. the top one is tripod and the bottom hand held. Shot with rebel xt and canon 70-300 with the image stabilizer turned off. Not a huge difference but enough softness in the bottom that if i was to print one it would be the top one. let me know how you like the flash. That is what I am looking at buying next. If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 23, 2007 19:16 | #8 rw2, I see what you mean. Both of these look good to me but the bottom one is not quite as sharp. JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/parksplace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rw2 Goldmember 4,201 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: North Dakota More info | Aug 23, 2007 19:20 | #9 Post some pictures taken with flash so we can all enjoy them! If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 23, 2007 19:21 | #10 Will do. JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/parksplace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 26, 2007 15:31 | #11 Not much but I had a problem figuring out how to get the flash to work. JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/parksplace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2929 guests, 159 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||