Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 22 Aug 2007 (Wednesday) 19:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

rose of sharon C&C please

 
jackprks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan City, IN
     
Aug 22, 2007 19:31 |  #1

Straight from the camera, only resize and save for web.

1/125s, f11, iso400-214mm Handheld and manual focus.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/​photos/parksplace (external link)

350d, Kit 18-55,, EF 50mm 1.4, Sigma 70-300 4/5.6 APO DG Macro, Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5 DG Macro, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Opteka 7000 tripod, Monfroto Monopod & 785B Modo , Sigma 500 super, Delta flash breacket, Kenko turbes, cards and batteries.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 22, 2007 20:41 |  #2

The back area of the flower that is blurry is to distracting. Usually if you can get your shutter speed higher than your focal length. Here it would have been nice to have your shutter speed higher than the 214mm. Unless you have image stabilization. This will cut down on motion blur. With the settings you had you needed a tripod.


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jackprks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan City, IN
     
Aug 23, 2007 07:25 |  #3

rw2, unfortunatley this was something that I saw early in the morning waiting for my lawyers office to open. I noticed the flower and grabbed my camera and shot. How do you tell that it is motion blur and not oof?

Maybe if I cropped out most of it, it would look better? I liked the color in the center with the creamy stamen.

thanks for the comment!!


JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/​photos/parksplace (external link)

350d, Kit 18-55,, EF 50mm 1.4, Sigma 70-300 4/5.6 APO DG Macro, Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5 DG Macro, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Opteka 7000 tripod, Monfroto Monopod & 785B Modo , Sigma 500 super, Delta flash breacket, Kenko turbes, cards and batteries.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 12:34 |  #4

It is probably some of both. So to get the sharpest picture you need to eliminate the motion. You can do that by increasing your shutter speed. In your case it would be hard to do with low light unless you used a flash.


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jackprks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan City, IN
     
Aug 23, 2007 12:47 |  #5

I just bought a Sigma DG 500 Super. I haven't gotten batteries for it yet but when I do, I will give it a try.

As I said before, This shot was done on impulse. I saw, I shot, I didn't think. Just used settings from last time, ev f11. :oops:


JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/​photos/parksplace (external link)

350d, Kit 18-55,, EF 50mm 1.4, Sigma 70-300 4/5.6 APO DG Macro, Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5 DG Macro, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Opteka 7000 tripod, Monfroto Monopod & 785B Modo , Sigma 500 super, Delta flash breacket, Kenko turbes, cards and batteries.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 18:02 |  #6

That f11 should give you a better depth of field but will also require either more light or slower shutter speed.


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 19:08 |  #7

I tried to duplicate your conditions. 1/125, ISO 400, f11, focal length 210mm. the top one is tripod and the bottom hand held. Shot with rebel xt and canon 70-300 with the image stabilizer turned off. Not a huge difference but enough softness in the bottom that if i was to print one it would be the top one. let me know how you like the flash. That is what I am looking at buying next.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jackprks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan City, IN
     
Aug 23, 2007 19:16 |  #8

rw2, I see what you mean. Both of these look good to me but the bottom one is not quite as sharp.

I will be getting batteries tomorrow and will try out the flash on saturday. If you wish, I can pm you with the results or post them here. Your choice.

thanks for your efforts, they are appreciated!! :D

By the way,I posted one in this forum "Bug ID Please", I thnk you will find that one much better, I followed your advice and made the shutter speed above the focal length. It worked!!!


JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/​photos/parksplace (external link)

350d, Kit 18-55,, EF 50mm 1.4, Sigma 70-300 4/5.6 APO DG Macro, Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5 DG Macro, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Opteka 7000 tripod, Monfroto Monopod & 785B Modo , Sigma 500 super, Delta flash breacket, Kenko turbes, cards and batteries.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 19:20 |  #9

Post some pictures taken with flash so we can all enjoy them!


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jackprks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan City, IN
     
Aug 23, 2007 19:21 |  #10

Will do.


JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/​photos/parksplace (external link)

350d, Kit 18-55,, EF 50mm 1.4, Sigma 70-300 4/5.6 APO DG Macro, Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5 DG Macro, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Opteka 7000 tripod, Monfroto Monopod & 785B Modo , Sigma 500 super, Delta flash breacket, Kenko turbes, cards and batteries.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jackprks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan City, IN
     
Aug 26, 2007 15:31 |  #11

Not much but I had a problem figuring out how to get the flash to work.

I have this calendar hanging on the wall so I used that to try it out.

1/60s, f5.6, iso400, 70mm manual and hand held. 1st no flash, 2cnd flash


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


JACK Photos http://www.flickr.com/​photos/parksplace (external link)

350d, Kit 18-55,, EF 50mm 1.4, Sigma 70-300 4/5.6 APO DG Macro, Sigma 17-70 2.8/4.5 DG Macro, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Opteka 7000 tripod, Monfroto Monopod & 785B Modo , Sigma 500 super, Delta flash breacket, Kenko turbes, cards and batteries.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,256 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
rose of sharon C&C please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2929 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.