Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Aug 2007 (Thursday) 15:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Am I crazy?

 
wildeep
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:30 |  #1

Wait... don't answer that. ;)

I have a 20D with a 50 f/1.8 and a 24-105 f/4L. I just recently purchased the 24-105 because my old (28-105 f/3.5-5.6) seemed to be giving me more and more OOF pictures. I seem to STILL be getting many OOF pictures even with these two reliable, new lenses.

I thought maybe it had something to do with my technique, but I have been doing this for many years and have never had the focus problems I'm having now. Everything seems to be slightly off.

The last few photo sessions I have been diligent in setting the focus point on the eyes of my subject and NOT re-composing, which is not how I work, but I have been trying to make sure that when I recompose I'm not changing the angle of the camera. So... that being said, I still have OOF pictures. Sometimes I can't find anywhere in the picture that IS in focus, sometimes I'll find an area that seems sharp, but I did not set as my focus point. I don't often use the center focus point, rather one of the side points that would allow my subject's eyes to be in one of the "thirds" of the frame.

I took some stills of a flower the other night with my 24-105, at 105mm, manual focus set on macro and just moved the camera "in and out" to focus, and achieved super results. However, this technique is not practical when shooting people, particularly children.

If you are still reading, thank you. Does this sound like a camera issue or an issue with my technique?

Oh, and one more thing - i have been noticing small pink dots on in the same spot on every image - seems like a dust issue, but using the camera's "sensor clean" function has not taken care of it. Any suggestions?

Thanks a million,
Erin




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:33 |  #2

How long have you had your 20D? Because Canon sensor dust looks like dust bunnies, no color. You may have a sensor issue.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wazza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,627 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:35 |  #3

Probably if we saw a couple examples, or technical settings, can then confirm it's definitely user/camera/technique.

I personally use only centre point focus, CF-04 mode (focus with *) and recompose after focusing on eyes. Even if the plane of focus moves by 5cm, with F8 or so, it realy shouldn't matter. Shooting wide open however will make it more obvious, but also lens aren't always as sharp at this point. Usually 2 stops down is where they hit their sweet spot.


New Zealand Photography Tours (external link) | Williams Photography - Queenstown Wedding Photography (external link) |
Instagram (external link) | Facebook - Weddings (external link) | Facebook - Landscapes + Tours (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wazza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,627 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:38 |  #4

PS> Sensor clean, DOESN'T clean the sensor. Instead it exposes it, so you can clean it yourself. (at your own risk!)


New Zealand Photography Tours (external link) | Williams Photography - Queenstown Wedding Photography (external link) |
Instagram (external link) | Facebook - Weddings (external link) | Facebook - Landscapes + Tours (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:42 |  #5

Let's see some sample pics with EXIF information.
Also, how are you cleaning the sensor? With a blower? Liquid based?

You do know that the 20D doesn't have the sensor removal system that the 400D and newer bodies have right? All it does is raises the mirror. You still have to clean it yourself. (Sorry if you already know this...just covering all bases here!:D)

Do you select the AF point yourself or let the camera select for you?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:42 |  #6

Its about 2 years old - I will try and find an example of my "little pink dots" and post it.

SuzyView wrote in post #3783009 (external link)
How long have you had your 20D? Because Canon sensor dust looks like dust bunnies, no color. You may have a sensor issue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:45 |  #7

Gosh, I feel stupid - I thought the sensor cleaned itself - I thought I read that it vibrated upon power up (??) and that was its way of cleaning itself. Geez... well, what is the best way to clean it then?

I will post some samples with EXIF for focus issues... thanks everyone...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:49 |  #8

Use a rocket blower, no can stuff, please. That opens a whole new thread. :(

Turn on the sensor clean, it will tell you on the LCD that you must have battery power and turn off when you are done. Say yes. Then take your lens off, turn camera to cavity side down, blow up. Sensor is exposed, mirror locked. If you blow it while it's upside down like that, the dust comes out. Blow it about 10 times, without touching the sensor. Then put the lens back on and turn the camera off. You will hear the mirror going back into position.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:56 |  #9

Okay, here's an example. This has NO PP, just converted from raw to jpeg. There's the full frame and close-up of her eyes.

Let me know if you need another example. :)

thanks..


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 15:58 |  #10

Here's the exif

Camera Model Name
Canon EOS 20D
Shooting Date/Time
8/14/2007 06:39:02
Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/800Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F2.2
Metering Modes
Centerweighted average metering
Exposure Compensation
0
ISO Speed
200
Lens
50mm
Focal Length
50.0 mm
Image size
3504 x 2336
Image Quality
RAW
Flash
Off
White Balance
Auto
AF mode
One-Shot AF




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Aug 23, 2007 16:01 as a reply to  @ wildeep's post |  #11

So this one was with the 50mm 1.8 @ f2.2.
Shutter speed was definitely not an issue.
Do you know that you have a good copy of the 50?
The fifty is known to be somewhat soft wide-open and I would guess even at f2.2...

Do you have any shots that are stopped down to say f4 for instance?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 23, 2007 16:03 |  #12

Center focus or evaluative or partial. That really is fuzzy, though. It's the 50 1.8, it looks like.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 23, 2007 16:09 |  #13

Hard to tell from the full shot, but it looks like the bricks at the right are in better focus than anything else.

I can't get any focus points in file viewer...

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 16:29 |  #14

How do I know if I have a good copy of the 50?

I'll check to see if I have any shots stopped down more...

thanks!

nicksan wrote in post #3783180 (external link)
So this one was with the 50mm 1.8 @ f2.2.
Shutter speed was definitely not an issue.
Do you know that you have a good copy of the 50?
The fifty is known to be somewhat soft wide-open and I would guess even at f2.2...

Do you have any shots that are stopped down to say f4 for instance?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 16:32 |  #15

I selected a specific focus - I guess that would be considered partial? It wasn't centered - I set the focus on her face (eyes).

thanks!

SuzyView wrote in post #3783194 (external link)
Center focus or evaluative or partial. That really is fuzzy, though. It's the 50 1.8, it looks like.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,195 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Am I crazy?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1701 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.