Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Aug 2007 (Thursday) 15:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Am I crazy?

 
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 23, 2007 17:54 |  #31

wildeep wrote in post #3783771 (external link)
I "manually" set my AF point, so basically, I pick the "little red square" that is closest to (to minimize recompisition) or directly on top of my subject's eyes. But the I am using AF, meaning I'm not using the focus ring. Does that make sense?

OK, just wanted to clear up the terminology. You *are* using autofocus.

So I still wonder why I can't see the autofocus points in File Viewer. Can anyone else see 'em?

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Aug 23, 2007 17:54 |  #32

wildeep wrote in post #3783819 (external link)
I'll check that out and maybe do a test - thanks!

You're welcome. ;)


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Aug 23, 2007 18:28 as a reply to  @ post 3783819 |  #33

Is it possible for you to post a 100% crop of the area in the image that you feel is in focus?

I think there is a possibility that something is indeed off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Aug 23, 2007 18:30 |  #34

wildeep wrote in post #3783592 (external link)
Okay, so this might answer one of my questions.... as I'm thinking about this, I did start noticing more OOF pictures about the time I started shooting raw. Is this because of the sharpening that my camera was doing for me before when I shot JPEG?

Is it normal for RAW to look slightly OOF until sharpened?

I still think I have other issues, but this might help a little...

Yes, it's to be expected that the RAW image needs sharpening.
I always apply some amount of sharpning in Photoshop...Specifical​lyt unsharp Mask. That's normal.

Not saying that's the answer here, just that sharpening is normal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 22:00 |  #35

nicksan wrote in post #3784021 (external link)
Is it possible for you to post a 100% crop of the area in the image that you feel is in focus?

I think there is a possibility that something is indeed off.

Here's part of the plane - it looks pretty sharp to me, and I know I was not focusing over there...

Again, thanks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Aug 23, 2007 22:36 |  #36

wildeep wrote in post #3785167 (external link)
Here's part of the plane - it looks pretty sharp to me, and I know I was not focusing over there...

Again, thanks.

I agree. Looks like it might be mis-firing a bit.

Since this is consistent with both your lenses, perhaps it might be the 20D.(??)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gravy ­ graffix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,134 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Logan Square and Joliet IL
     
Aug 23, 2007 22:48 |  #37

yours and mine... simple run thru smart sharpen...

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1376/1218588855_40bc020510_o.jpg

Peoria IL Wedding Photographer (external link) Chicago Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 23:14 |  #38

nicksan wrote in post #3785388 (external link)
I agree. Looks like it might be mis-firing a bit.

Since this is consistent with both your lenses, perhaps it might be the 20D.(??)

..... this makes me feel both better and worse.... better my focusing skills might not be as sucky as I was starting to think..... worse that I might need to spend $$$.... :confused:

Do you know, should I try and contact Canon directly? I have never had any service work done before.

Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 23, 2007 23:15 |  #39

gravy graffix wrote in post #3785435 (external link)
yours and mine... simple run thru smart sharpen...

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

QUOTED IMAGE

Thanks! Yours definitely does look sharper. ;) I'll have to upgrade PS so I can utilize smart sharpen...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 24, 2007 09:35 |  #40

While I'm at it, here's an example one of the pink dots I keep getting, in the same spot of each image, this is at 100% crop. Is it dust?

Thanks!

PS. Again... notice the focus? Its crap.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 24, 2007 15:37 |  #41

^^^^^ Any thoughts on my little pink dots?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 24, 2007 16:00 |  #42

Well, they're not dust on your sensor. Those show up gray. Looks like a sensor problem from here...

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Aug 24, 2007 16:02 |  #43

wildeep wrote in post #3789722 (external link)
^^^^^ Any thoughts on my little pink dots?

I think your link pink dot is a "hot pixel"

I have read a thread somewhere that described a way of correcting this but, alas, not always successful.

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Aug 24, 2007 16:08 |  #44

wildeep wrote in post #3787534 (external link)
While I'm at it, here's an example one of the pink dots I keep getting, in the same spot of each image, this is at 100% crop. Is it dust?

Thanks!

PS. Again... notice the focus? Its crap.

Looks like a hot pixel problem you have there.

As for sharpening, you can try to apply some Unsharp Mask (USM) in photoshop...that's what a lot of folks do as part of their routine when shooting Raw.

Yeah, I would call Canon up and maybe get them to calibrate everything. Not sure what can be done about the hot pixel looking thing there...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wildeep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 24, 2007 17:10 |  #45

Thank you everyone, I'll do some "hot pixel" research... crossing my fingers its not spendy...

Erin




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,193 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Am I crazy?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1701 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.