Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 26 Aug 2007 (Sunday) 19:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wedding Exposure

 
Souwalker
Goldmember
1,128 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Aug 26, 2007 19:06 |  #1

Hi
I am not a wedding photographer but I was invited to a wedding yesterday and I brought my camera simply to takes pictures for myself. It was a beautifyl sunny day, clear blue sky and you'd know picture taken outside of the church with the white bride gownaand the dark grooms suits would normally be an challenge. I really did not know what to expose for the correct exposure so not to blow out the bride's gown. I'm a hobbiest so please forgive dumb questions but only want to improve.
I shot in manual mode f8 for aperture but I pointed my camera to the nice blue sky for the correct exposure and adjusted my shutter speed till the camera exposure meter sat right smack in the middle. I kept that same exposure setting and fire a few shots of the wedding party standing outside the church. After the shots, I lookeda the histogram and the bride's white gown was flashing (overexposed). I had a 350D so spot metering is a no-no.
Next, I tried partial metering the bride's white gown and adjust teh shutter speed until the camera's exposure meter was in the centre. I took shots of the party again and the histogram still showed the white gown overexposed.
What would be the best way to get the correct exposure under those circumstance?
Many Thanks
Pat




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mellowd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: South African in London, UK
     
Aug 26, 2007 19:08 |  #2

If it still shows overexposed you could dial in a -1 exposure compensation. If its still too high you could try -2


5D : 17-40L : 85 f1.8 : 135L f2.0L - Full Gear List Here!
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Souwalker
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,128 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Aug 26, 2007 19:56 as a reply to  @ mellowd's post |  #3

Thanks.
I was in M mode so I should dial down the shutter speed? I think the shutter was showing 320.
Rgds
pat




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mellowd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: South African in London, UK
     
Aug 26, 2007 20:05 |  #4

You would need to do it that way in M mode. If you were in AV mode you can dial in a -1 or -2 exposure (or 1/3 stops) by holding down the AV button and moving the wheel left or right. You'll see the bar moving to the left or right showing the values or under or overexposure


5D : 17-40L : 85 f1.8 : 135L f2.0L - Full Gear List Here!
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 27, 2007 10:47 |  #5

I was in M mode so I should dial down the shutter speed?

Yes, & good for you for using "M"! ;)

Need an exposure crutch?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steiglitz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,526 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake George, NY State, Supposed Arrogant, but Not really....
     
Aug 27, 2007 14:13 |  #6

Put the camera in Av mode, then ISO 100, F8, then set to evaluative metering, and set to RAW. Then take a test shot. Adjust the EC + or - until the hist shows little or no blown dress, but bias toward over exposure, but without making unrecoverable dress exposure. Take the keeper pics. You can't go wrong. Normalized the shadows later during post processing.

No need for manual camera outside during good day light. And never use the sky to meter for weddings...


Gear is essential, but often has little to do with composition, pictures, and art...Alfred Steiglitz :lol:

Canon 5D, Canon 1D Mark II, All L primes from 14mm through 200mm. All L zooms from 16mm through 400mm. 2.0x TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Souwalker
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,128 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Aug 27, 2007 18:51 |  #7

Steiglitz wrote in post #3806915 (external link)
Put the camera in Av mode, then ISO 100, F8, then set to evaluative metering, and set to RAW. Then take a test shot. Adjust the EC + or - until the hist shows little or no blown dress, but bias toward over exposure, but without making unrecoverable dress exposure. Take the keeper pics. You can't go wrong. Normalized the shadows later during post processing.

No need for manual camera outside during good day light. And never use the sky to meter for weddings...

Thanks for this. Why should we never use the sky to meter for weddings?
Thanks
pat




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RedHot
Senior Member
992 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Aug 27, 2007 19:08 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Souwalker wrote in post #3808563 (external link)
Thanks for this. Why should we never use the sky to meter for weddings?

Was the wedding party you were taking pictures of in the sunlight? I'm guessing you've read Understand Exposure which is where metering off the sky is referred to often.

Whenever you have something bright white covering only a small (guessing) part of your frame, you'll have to adjust your exposure in some way from a standard light meter reading. That book is largely written for film, which has higher dynamic range to handle bright and dark areas. Digital seems to need to expose for the highlights and then deal with lightening shadow if they are too dark.

And you learned the important lesson of needing to check your histogram when you start shooting a scene instead of afterwards when nothing can be done. When your lighting changes or your comosition changes, check and adjust if necessary to have a good histogram. Then you can keep shooting with the same overall exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Souwalker
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,128 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Aug 27, 2007 19:47 |  #9

RedHot wrote in post #3808683 (external link)
Was the wedding party you were taking pictures of in the sunlight? I'm guessing you've read Understand Exposure which is where metering off the sky is referred to often.

Whenever you have something bright white covering only a small (guessing) part of your frame, you'll have to adjust your exposure in some way from a standard light meter reading. That book is largely written for film, which has higher dynamic range to handle bright and dark areas. Digital seems to need to expose for the highlights and then deal with lightening shadow if they are too dark.

And you learned the important lesson of needing to check your histogram when you start shooting a scene instead of afterwards when nothing can be done. When your lighting changes or your comosition changes, check and adjust if necessary to have a good histogram. Then you can keep shooting with the same overall exposure.

Interesting. Learn something new everyday :D Yeah, I read Understanding Exxposure hence exposed for the sky. Would exposing on a 18% grey cloth do the trick? Or would the earlier reply of using AV then +/- EC be just as good?
Thanks
Pat




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 28, 2007 09:04 |  #10

Why should we never use the sky to meter for weddings?

The sky is never a constant level of brightness, where your hand is. Why don't you try the link I gave you in post #5, instead of looking for "18% grey cloth" alternatives?

Or would the earlier reply of using AV then +/- EC be just as good?

It may not seem like it now, but there's a reason I shoot on "M". It's simpler & easier in the long run for me, than dialing in EC. The day will come (soon) when you forget that you did it & shoot with the wrong EC dialed in. ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gateruner
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Katy, Texas
     
Oct 02, 2007 09:54 |  #11

There is an exception to metering the sky and that is when you want to silhouette the couple against a pretty sunset or sunrise. It will nicely silhouette them and if you want both the nice sky and the subject in view you add flash.


Scott { Website (external link) } {Blog (external link)}
5D x 4, Canon 30D x 2, Canon G12, 70-200 2.8L is x2, 17-55 IS, 24-70 2.8L x2, 85 1.2, 50 1.2, Canon 1.4 TX, 18-55 kit lens, Vert Grip x 2, Bogen Pro Mono, 580 EX x 2, 430EX, 28 gig memory, Pelican 1564 & a bunch of older Canon/Pentax stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
Oct 02, 2007 12:01 |  #12

PhotosGuy wrote in post #3812816 (external link)
The day will come (soon) when you forget that you did it & shoot with the wrong EC dialed in. ;)

amen to that.


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RedHot
Senior Member
992 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Oct 02, 2007 16:43 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

gateruner wrote in post #4049354 (external link)
There is an exception to metering the sky and that is when you want to silhouette the couple against a pretty sunset or sunrise.

There are always exceptions to every concept/idea, but that's not a good thing to throw at someone trying to learn normal pictures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,030 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Wedding Exposure
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2028 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.