Has anyone tested the 40D with some Tamron lenses yet to see if they still work? I would really like to know if my 17-50 and 90 are going to have problems with the new body since Tamron reverse engineers Canon’s technology vs Sigma who buys it.
Aug 31, 2007 13:33 | #1 Has anyone tested the 40D with some Tamron lenses yet to see if they still work? I would really like to know if my 17-50 and 90 are going to have problems with the new body since Tamron reverse engineers Canon’s technology vs Sigma who buys it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Aug 31, 2007 13:45 | #2 MaxxuM wrote in post #3835075 Has anyone tested the 40D with some Tamron lenses yet to see if they still work? I would really like to know if my 17-50 and 90 are going to have problems with the new body since Tamron reverse engineers Canon’s technology vs Sigma who buys it. shouldn't that be the other way around? http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
_aravena isn't this answer a stickie yet? 12,458 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2007 Location: Back in the 757 More info | Aug 31, 2007 13:46 | #3 Isn't this still all speculation since none of us own a 40D or work with Sigma, Tamron, or Canon? Last Shot Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bacchanal Cream of the Crop 5,284 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fort Wayne, IN More info | Aug 31, 2007 13:49 | #4 _aravena wrote in post #3835158 Isn't this still all speculation since none of us own a 40D or work with Sigma, Tamron, or Canon? Sorry, I just never understood all these questions on something that technically doesn't exist yet. It exists! It exists!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Aug 31, 2007 13:51 | #5 _aravena wrote in post #3835158 Isn't this still all speculation since none of us own a 40D or work with Sigma, Tamron, or Canon? Sorry, I just never understood all these questions on something that technically doesn't exist yet. there are plenty of 40d owners. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
_aravena isn't this answer a stickie yet? 12,458 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2007 Location: Back in the 757 More info | Aug 31, 2007 14:00 | #6 No, they own the privilege of receiving one, but not actually in their possession. Last Shot Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bacchanal Cream of the Crop 5,284 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fort Wayne, IN More info | Aug 31, 2007 14:02 | #7 _aravena wrote in post #3835251 No, they own the privilege of receiving one, but not actually in their possession. And I said, technically, not actually. No, people have received them. Come on man, this is POTN, you should be in the know.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 31, 2007 14:09 | #8 ed rader wrote in post #3835151 shouldn't that be the other way around? i would expect sigma incompatibility before tamron. ed rader The way I understand it is Sigma is less likely to have problems than Tamron because they pay Canon to use the AF technology while Tamron reverse engineers it meaning they ‘may’ have trouble auto-focusing, sending info to the camera and generally working.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Clean Cream of the Crop 6,002 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington More info | Aug 31, 2007 14:10 | #9 There's nothing drastically changed enough in the 40D body to lens AF that would cause any 3rd party lenses not to work. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 31, 2007 14:14 | #10 Mr. Clean wrote in post #3835302 There's nothing drastically changed enough in the 40D body to lens AF that would cause any 3rd party lenses not to work. Personally, I think that stuff is a thing of the past. You are probably right... But I would still like to hear it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wimg Cream of the Crop 6,982 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands, EU More info | Aug 31, 2007 15:36 | #11 MaxxuM wrote in post #3835294 The way I understand it is Sigma is less likely to have problems than Tamron because they pay Canon to use the AF technology while Tamron reverse engineers it meaning they ‘may’ have trouble auto-focusing, sending info to the camera and generally working. Nope, Sigma is the only of the 3 main non-OEM players not to pay license fees to Canon, according to my sources. Sigma is the one doing the reverse engineering, not Tamron. EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters, and an accessory plague
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend. 66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Aug 31, 2007 15:44 | #12 _aravena wrote in post #3835251 No, they own the privilege of receiving one, but not actually in their possession. And I said, technically, not actually. Might actually want to read around the forum...several people have 40Ds in their possession and are actually out using them. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 31, 2007 17:50 | #13 wimg wrote in post #3835757 Nope, Sigma is the only of the 3 main non-OEM players not to pay license fees to Canon, according to my sources. Sigma is the one doing the reverse engineering, not Tamron. Kind regards, Wim Woolburr wrote in post #3835796 For the OP: There is no earthly reason to expect that Tamron lenses won't work on the 40D. It is just an upgrade to an existing camera line.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1063 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||