Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 01 Sep 2007 (Saturday) 08:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8/25/07 Wedding Photos

 
maxwax13
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 01, 2007 08:44 |  #1

Here are some photos from my most recent wedding. They were shot at Niagara-on-the-Lake, in Ontario. C&C welcome.

1.

IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_181DS.jpg
2.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_402DS.jpg
3.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_420DBS.jpg
4.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_467DS.jpg
5.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_484DS.jpg
6.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_514DS.jpg
7.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_495DS.jpg
8.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_550DBS.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maxwax13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 01, 2007 08:48 |  #2

a few from the reception too :)

9.

IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_787DS.jpg
10.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_813DS.jpg
11.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_936DS.jpg
12.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_1051DS.jpg
13.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_1063DS.jpg
14.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_1093DS.jpg
15.
IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_1037DS.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 01, 2007 08:55 |  #3

Your photos are all orange.

2. Nice shot, fix white bal & exposure.
3 & 4. Cool. Try and make the people stand out.
5. Almost. Not quite there but I see where you're going and I like it.
6. Bring back the highlights. Nice shot.
7. Not so good, don't like posing or expressions. Wide angles bad sometimes.
8. Again, almost, but not quite. They'll love it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 01, 2007 08:55 |  #4

9 & 10 - great!
11 - bad shadows
rest - nothing that jumps out at me


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stathunter
"I am no one really"
Avatar
5,659 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Sep 01, 2007 08:56 |  #5

Some great shots. I like the diversity in the work. I am sure the couple will be pleased.


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maxwax13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 01, 2007 09:01 |  #6

tim wrote in post #3839605 (external link)
9 & 10 - great!
11 - bad shadows
rest - nothing that jumps out at me

11 - bad shadows? I thought it looked kinda cool...made the group look even bigger. Are big shadows on the wall a faux pa?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 01, 2007 09:05 |  #7

To me, yes, to others, who knows.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Sep 01, 2007 09:12 |  #8

I think they are all very well done, in particular 9&10 have great texture to them. The bride's skin tones look more flattering and faces have real emotion. Some of the first are processed with more color than I do for my weddings, but they work. Beautiful couple. I don't know what the knife and tied up wife thing was all about, but maybe you can discuss that in the G&N section ;)?


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lkrms
"stupidly long verbal diarrhoea"
Avatar
4,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia
     
Sep 01, 2007 09:21 |  #9

There are shadows within the group too. You need to watch your off-camera strobe placement ... it looks like you've put it in one place and left it there for the night, rather than adjusting it as needed. In many shots it worked well, but for the group dancing it needed to be higher or somewhere else.

I agree with Tim's comments in general. I'd add that #5 looks distorted, though I do like the concept. Also #14 achieves nothing with the shoes blurry. It would have been a good storyteller with the shoes in focus and the bride dancing with the others in the blurred background.

Your outdoor shots are well-composed and executed but it's a pity the sky is totally blown out in all of them ... it gives them a gharish look (even/especially the black and whites). You obviously know how to move your flash off camera, so why not play with using it to balance people shots with blue or cloudy sky? I'd also recommend playing with shallower depth of field in at least *some* of these shots ... it would help deal with the busyness of your backgrounds.

These are all minor issues really ... the B&G will love your photos, and so they should. Sorry if I offered too much critique ... but it's what I hope people will offer for my images!

Keep up the great work!


Luke
Headshot photographer Sydney and Newcastle (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maxwax13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 01, 2007 09:40 |  #10

SuzyView wrote in post #3839688 (external link)
I think they are all very well done, in particular 9&10 have great texture to them. The bride's skin tones look more flattering and faces have real emotion. Some of the first are processed with more color than I do for my weddings, but they work. Beautiful couple. I don't know what the knife and tied up wife thing was all about, but maybe you can discuss that in the G&N section ;)?

Okay, I toned down the curve I used for the colour pop in photo #5. I added a little sharpening too. Let me know if this is better. I can see how it looked a little more orange than it should.

As for the knife and the garter thing. The Groom did it Reservoir Dogsstyle to the tune of "Stuck In The Middle With You". He tied up her hands behind the chair and each leg too. Was pretty damn funny. In the Reservoir Dogs movie the guys ear got cut off though, not a garter :)

M.

IMAGE: http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x40/maxwax13/img_484D2S.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
madhatter04
Goldmember
1,930 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Sep 01, 2007 13:44 |  #11

I think the shots are great, and I love the color scheme they chose! Thank goodness it wasn't pink!


Designer // Art Director // Photographer
www.alexanderfitch.com (external link) | AlexFitchPhoto on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MALI
Senior Member
430 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Bloomington, IN
     
Sep 01, 2007 16:24 |  #12

1. Nice composition. Too much saturation?

2. Nice. Definitely too much saturation.

3. Good. Not sure about the BW conversion.

4. Same as #3. BW looks like it is making the faces difficult to see.

5. Nice angle. Too much saturation.

6. Same as #5.

7. See previous.

8. See #3.

9. Very nice.

10. See #9.

11. Naah... Shadows did it in.

12. Not too bad. Hard to see it is a bouquet throw, though.

13. Now you started to be using this effect just too much.

14. So, so.

15. Same as #14.

Thanks for sharing.


Canon 20D, 10-22, 24-70L,70-200L f/2.8 IS, 580 EX, RS-80N3, EP-EX15, BG-E2, E1.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,388 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
8/25/07 Wedding Photos
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1371 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.