Hi Folks,
Anyone know what this guy is called ? Thanks in advance -
![]() | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
luvdodo Member 118 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Gainesville, VA More info | Sep 02, 2007 19:11 | #1 Hi Folks,
Thanks,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 02, 2007 20:38 | #2 Also, on closer observation, it is clear that some parts of the spider and sharp whereas places like the head are blurred. Thanks,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mrvile Senior Member 541 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Sep 02, 2007 20:48 | #3 luvdodo wrote in post #3848329 Also, on closer observation, it is clear that some parts of the spider and sharp whereas places like the head are blurred. What's the best setting to get a sharp efefct across the spider? Would this be a problem with my lens? Usually if you focus on the eyes or head, the other parts of the subject can still be out-of-focus without having to worry about it looking like you missed focus. However, if you want the entire thing to be in focus, you'll have to stop down to gain more DOF. Try shooting at f/11 or smaller...although for larger subjects, it's rather hard to get the entire body in focus unless you use a smaller magnification. Eric
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 02, 2007 21:24 | #4 Mrvile wrote in post #3848372 Usually if you focus on the eyes or head, the other parts of the subject can still be out-of-focus without having to worry about it looking like you missed focus. However, if you want the entire thing to be in focus, you'll have to stop down to gain more DOF. Try shooting at f/11 or smaller...although for larger subjects, it's rather hard to get the entire body in focus unless you use a smaller magnification. Any suggestions on what AF points need to be used? Would it be all versus just the center one? I guess all with a combination of F/11 would make it a lot better? Mrvile wrote in post #3848372 Oh and by the way, the spider looks like a young Rabid Wolf Spider, Rabidosa rabida, to me. Bang on...I looked uo those words and foudn some pics on google and you are absolutely right. Looks like you've spent a lot of time of spiders ? Thanks,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mrvile Senior Member 541 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Sep 02, 2007 21:27 | #5 I wouldn't use AF with macro at higher magnifications...stick to manual focus. It's the most accurate. And if you do use AF, don't use all the focus points - the camera will just confuse itself. Eric
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 02, 2007 21:44 | #6 Mrvile wrote in post #3848578 I wouldn't use AF with macro at higher magnifications...stick to manual focus. It's the most accurate. And if you do use AF, don't use all the focus points - the camera will just confuse itself. And as for my ID...check out this site: http://bugguide.net Thanks for the inputs and that's a fantastic site Thanks,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2774 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||