Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 04 Sep 2007 (Tuesday) 00:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lightweight, Inexpensive Travel Tripod/Head Combo

 
sunnybeach
Senior Member
275 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: U.S.A.
     
Sep 04, 2007 00:45 |  #1

I currently have the Bogen 3021 legs with the 488RC2 head & also the 3265 head. Great set-up!! I use the Rebel XT with lenses in my sig. What I need now is an inexpensive, lightweight combo for the times I don't want the weight of the 3021. I have narrowed it down to three possibilities & would like your input on which one is the best.

Slik Pro 340DX-1st Choice
Slik Pro 330DX-2nd Choice
SlikSprint Pro-3rd Choice

I also need your input on the heads. Is the Bogen 484RC2 enough or do I need to go with the 486RC2?

I would love to get a carbon fiber tripod, but like I said.....inexpensive. The amount of times I will be using this does not justify spending more than $100.00 US for the legs.

Thanks for all replies. Kath


40D--30D --70-300L--24-70L--100 f/2--50 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nutsnbolts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,279 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
     
Sep 04, 2007 00:49 |  #2

I am actually interested in this as well. I am on the fence between the manfrotto's, specifically 682B and one before it.


Canon EOS 40D | EOS Rebel XTI/400D | G9
Lenses and Gear List
Review of my ThinkTank Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Watarski
Member
201 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Sep 04, 2007 10:41 as a reply to  @ nutsnbolts's post |  #3

What about the Bogen 725B? Has a ball head as the main difference. I was looking at this model - not much more than $100...


50mm f/1.4
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8
Canon 70-200 f/4 L
Canon 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sunnybeach
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
275 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: U.S.A.
     
Sep 04, 2007 12:28 as a reply to  @ Watarski's post |  #4

Just went back to B&H to look at the 725B, it's on sale, & less than the ones I mentioned. Must have passed that one up thinking it was not the RC2 QR system. The ballhead on this tripod is a non-removable type. Wonder if this head will be too small for a DSLR?? Thinking that it might be more for a P&S?? Any input would be appreciated.
Kath


40D--30D --70-300L--24-70L--100 f/2--50 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Sep 04, 2007 16:53 |  #5

I have a 728B, it has a non removable pan/tilt head and it supports the 20D with 70-200 2.8 just fine. It doesnt have all the bells and whistles but it does what I need it to do.

Edit: If anyone has one of the digi model tripods, you can take the rubber foot off the bottom of the center column and put a stainless "S" hook through the 2 holes in the bottom and then hang your camera bag from the bottom of the column and this makes it 10 times more stable.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,330 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2521
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 04, 2007 23:49 |  #6

I was in the same boat as you...

You stated, "I currently have the Bogen 3021 legs with the 488RC2 head & also the 3265 head. Great set-up!!"

I have the Manfrotto 3001P legs with a 488RC2 Ball head and also have a Calumet pan-tilt head. I use this as as my go to tripod...

Additionally, I have a Davis and Sanford tripod which I have had for at least 25 years. This old workhorse has both a pan-tilt head and a fluid head. The darn thing could support a Volkswagen but, it is also as heavy as a VW. I do frequently use this tripod, especially when I am in a fairly stationary shooting position.

I also felt that I needed a relatively inexpensive, lightweight combo for the times I don't want the weight of the 3001P".

I wanted the tripod primarily as a base for pano shooting. While I have shot panos hand-held, there is simply no comparison with a tripod mounted string of shots.

I stopped off at my local Calumet Photo Shop in Escondido, CA and looked at composite (such as carbon fiber) tripods. They were very expensive. Since I had two other tripods, I didn't want to hock my home for a composite tripod. Gitzo's were out of reach as were the composite Manfrotto tripods. Even the Chinese rip-off of the Gitzo, the Benro's were expensive if you opted for a composite model and the aluminum Benro was too heavy for my needs.

They had a Slik Pro 330DX in stock and on sale. It was the lightest weight metal tripod in the store and was also as light as some of the composite models. The price was good, about $82.00 including California State Tax. So I picked it up. The tripod will suit my purposes and at 3.5 pounds or so I will carry this rig when I would not carry the heavier rigs.

The longest lens I plan to use on this tripod is the 70-200mm f/4L IS and usually, it will be my 24-70mm f/2.8L on a 30D camera. Just for fun, I tried the tripod with my 400mm f/5.6L lens and the Slik 330Pro DX is not really sturdy enough for that weight, especially in any type of a wind (and it is not advertised to be used with that much weight).

Since I got the tripod at a good price and since I never plan to use it with the center column extended, I purchased the shorter center column which subtracts a couple of ounces from the total weight. This allows the tripod to be used in a much lower position than with the stock center column. You could just cut off the stock center column and save the price of the short model.

The tripod adjusts easily and (most importantly) stays in adjustment; at least for the short time I have been using it. The head is minimal and without a lot of bells and whistles but - serves its purpose. The head is also interchangeable and you can use any head with a 1/4 screw attachment or with a 3/8 inch attachment and a bushing.

I have to be honest and say that I would rather have a carbon fiber tripod but, I just cannot justify the expense since the Slik does the job I bought it for.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cprofit
Member
68 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Sep 05, 2007 11:18 |  #7

You could sell your Bogen legs and pick up a Feisol, that way you'd only have one tripod. That should be about an additional $100.

My Feisol 3401 works just fine and dandy.


Corey
5D l Other Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sunnybeach
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
275 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: U.S.A.
     
Sep 05, 2007 16:45 as a reply to  @ cprofit's post |  #8

For those of you who have the pan/tilt head...can you tell me how long the handles are? The tripod will be used for sightseeing in the Charleston area ( plantations, landscapes, etc ), & hiking in the woods around home. Do you think that head sufficient for those purposes or is a ball head better? (never used a pan/tilt head)
Thanks, Kath


40D--30D --70-300L--24-70L--100 f/2--50 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,735 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Lightweight, Inexpensive Travel Tripod/Head Combo
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1243 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.