Since circular polarizers were developed, primarily, to acommadate lenses that turn when focusing. . . is there a special need for using circular vs. linear polarizers on the end of the lens for digital cameras?
HarrySettle Senior Member 663 posts Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bemidji, MN More info | Jul 11, 2004 09:50 | #1 Since circular polarizers were developed, primarily, to acommadate lenses that turn when focusing. . . is there a special need for using circular vs. linear polarizers on the end of the lens for digital cameras?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KennyG Goldmember 2,252 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Leeds, UK More info | Jul 11, 2004 10:17 | #2 Actually, circular polarizers were developed for cameras with TTL (Through The Lens) metering, nothing at all to do with rotating lenses. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
c0ntr0lz Goldmember 1,889 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: dallas tx usa More info | Jul 11, 2004 11:30 | #3 was at the car show the other day
as you can see the paper was no longer there and i thought about shooting one with the paper just so i could show it off when ques were asked like this Jakeb Miller Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SWPhotoImaging Goldmember 3,231 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: No. Calif. More info | Jul 11, 2004 15:14 | #4 The heck with the paper, or the ploarizer . . . I want the Impala! That's a gorgeous ('59?) hardtop! SWPhoto-Imaging
LOG IN TO REPLY |
93octane Senior Member 518 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Brownsville TX More info | Jul 11, 2004 15:42 | #5 yeah nice impala. Canon EOS 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lamplight Goldmember 1,072 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Bellingham, WA More info | Jul 11, 2004 18:45 | #6 Mmm...'61 Impala. :drool:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2004 18:55 | #7 It's got to be more than just the TTL metering, because we've been shooting with film that way with linears for years. I might bite on ETTL if that's the case. I'm not arguing with anyone, just curious.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
c0ntr0lz Goldmember 1,889 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: dallas tx usa More info | Jul 11, 2004 21:21 | #8 thanks guys Jakeb Miller Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KennyG Goldmember 2,252 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Leeds, UK More info | Jul 12, 2004 00:57 | #9 You have to rotate both types of filter. A linear polarizer is not suitable for TTL AF due to the way it effects the incoming light. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 12, 2004 16:14 | #10 Got it. Good links. However, correct me if I'm wrong, aren't linear polarizers what we have been using all along? At least up until the last couple of years.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | Jul 12, 2004 19:18 | #11 I switched from a different camera brand to Canon in 1997. At that time, I discovered that my old linear polarizer didn't work right on Canon. Then I discovered that circular polarizers cost more than linear ones.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kufel Member 206 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Mississauga, ON Canada More info | Jul 12, 2004 21:12 | #12 linear polarizers affect autofocusing mainly, TTL to some effect as well, but AF is the main reason that we have to use circulars. Remember - the sensors in AF are checking the vertical and horizontal lines to focus (cross sensors at least, regular - only vertical lines) Fujifilm X-T1, XF 35mm 1.4, XF 60mm f2.4, XF 50-140 f2.8, XF 16-50 f2.8, XF 55-200 f3.5-5.6, EF-42 flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1799 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||