Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 11 Jul 2004 (Sunday) 09:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Another polarizer question

 
Harry ­ Settle
Senior Member
663 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bemidji, MN
     
Jul 11, 2004 09:50 |  #1

Since circular polarizers were developed, primarily, to acommadate lenses that turn when focusing. . . is there a special need for using circular vs. linear polarizers on the end of the lens for digital cameras?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Jul 11, 2004 10:17 |  #2

Actually, circular polarizers were developed for cameras with TTL (Through The Lens) metering, nothing at all to do with rotating lenses.

You should use circular polarizers.


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c0ntr0lz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: dallas tx usa
     
Jul 11, 2004 11:30 |  #3

was at the car show the other day
and i was taking a photo of this car that had a piece of paper on the dash
when i adjusted my CP....


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


as you can see the paper was no longer there
and i thought about shooting one with the paper just so i could show it off when ques were asked like this

Jakeb Miller Photography (external link)
Jakeb Auto photography (external link)
EOS Canon 400d//18-55mm//Sigma 28-80mm macro (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Jul 11, 2004 15:14 |  #4

The heck with the paper, or the ploarizer . . . I want the Impala! That's a gorgeous ('59?) hardtop!


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
93octane
Senior Member
Avatar
518 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Brownsville TX
     
Jul 11, 2004 15:42 |  #5

yeah nice impala. :D


Canon EOS 6D
Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS II L
Canon 24-105 F4 IS L
Canon 40mm 2.8 L
Fuji X-T1 fanboy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lamplight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,072 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Bellingham, WA
     
Jul 11, 2004 18:45 |  #6

Mmm...'61 Impala. :drool:

I was thinking that it would be difficult to use a polarizing filter on a lens that rotated when focusing. Unless maybe you focused and then adjusted the filter, but I don't know. ??? I have one I can use on my 50mm 1.8, but the end of that lens does not rotate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harry ­ Settle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
663 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bemidji, MN
     
Jul 11, 2004 18:55 |  #7

It's got to be more than just the TTL metering, because we've been shooting with film that way with linears for years. I might bite on ETTL if that's the case. I'm not arguing with anyone, just curious.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c0ntr0lz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: dallas tx usa
     
Jul 11, 2004 21:21 |  #8

thanks guys
yeah it was a beauty
so is a linear one that you dont have to rotate?


Jakeb Miller Photography (external link)
Jakeb Auto photography (external link)
EOS Canon 400d//18-55mm//Sigma 28-80mm macro (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Jul 12, 2004 00:57 |  #9

You have to rotate both types of filter. A linear polarizer is not suitable for TTL AF due to the way it effects the incoming light.

May I suggest you read this:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorial​s/polarizers.shtml (external link)

Or this:
http://w1.541.telia.co​m …rs_faq/filters.​html#polq2 (external link)

Or even this:
http://www.outdoorphot​ographer.com …2001/july/polar​izing.html (external link)


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harry ­ Settle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
663 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bemidji, MN
     
Jul 12, 2004 16:14 |  #10

Got it. Good links. However, correct me if I'm wrong, aren't linear polarizers what we have been using all along? At least up until the last couple of years.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Jul 12, 2004 19:18 |  #11

I switched from a different camera brand to Canon in 1997. At that time, I discovered that my old linear polarizer didn't work right on Canon. Then I discovered that circular polarizers cost more than linear ones.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kufel
Member
206 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Mississauga, ON Canada
     
Jul 12, 2004 21:12 |  #12

linear polarizers affect autofocusing mainly, TTL to some effect as well, but AF is the main reason that we have to use circulars. Remember - the sensors in AF are checking the vertical and horizontal lines to focus (cross sensors at least, regular - only vertical lines)


Fujifilm X-T1, XF 35mm 1.4, XF 60mm f2.4, XF 50-140 f2.8, XF 16-50 f2.8, XF 55-200 f3.5-5.6, EF-42 flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,779 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Another polarizer question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1747 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.