Going forward I think everyone should be mindful that when making threads or posting to make clear distinction between these two cameras to avoid confusion.
1D Mk.III
1Ds Mk.III
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity  10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Sep 06, 2007 09:29 | #1 Going forward I think everyone should be mindful that when making threads or posting to make clear distinction between these two cameras to avoid confusion. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JC4 Goldmember  2,610 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Columbus, Ohio More info | Sep 06, 2007 09:36 | #2 Crossed my mind the other day. Just saying MK-III has been distinctive enough, but not any more. I've been deliberate in putting 1d in front lately. John Caputo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth THREAD STARTER I'm comfortable with my masculinity 10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Sep 06, 2007 11:54 | #3 1 series is the family. Naming it 2D would imply that the 1D Mk. III is superior to the 1Ds Mk.III, which it's not. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GyRob Cream of the Crop 10,206 posts Likes: 1413 Joined Feb 2005 Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK. More info | Sep 06, 2007 12:02 | #4 no one will get confused - 1 doesen't work and the other might work "The LensMaster Gimbal"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth THREAD STARTER I'm comfortable with my masculinity 10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Dec 05, 2007 15:35 | #5 bump for the dummies people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000)  More info | Dec 05, 2007 16:01 | #6 As with the previous MkII's.. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 05, 2007 16:11 | #7 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #4446726  Since Canon itself has only added an "S" to differ this super camera from the flock, why should we be any different? The flock is MkIII, to differ we need to add the "S" Okie dokie Jake! Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember  4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Dec 05, 2007 17:55 | #8 cosworth wrote in post #3874270 1 series is the family. Naming it 2D would imply that the 1D Mk. III is superior to the 1Ds Mk.III, which it's not. You Sure Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pjtemplin Senior Member 311 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Dec 06, 2007 08:58 | #9  Permanent banAs with the previous MkII's.. For my money since the ownership of the 1D is well beyond 10 to 1 vs. the 1Ds,. we need only specify when referring to the relatively rare 1Ds. ie: a "MkIII" is a 1D One must add "1Ds" to that to specify the 1Ds.. just MHO Since Canon itself has only added an "S" to differ this super camera from the flock, why should we be any different? The flock is MkIII, to differ we need to add the "S" Wow, I guess you're in charge around here. I'll leave now. 1D MkIII, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS, nifty fifty, 3xSpeedlite 580EX II, Rebel XTi w/ kit 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Dec 06, 2007 10:17 | #10 ??? I just stated my opinion, it may differ from Cosworth's, but it by no means was an edict.. if this frightens you off, I guess that's up to you. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 06, 2007 10:20 | #11 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #4450936 ??? I just stated my opinion, it may differ from Cosworth's, but it by no means was an edict.. if this frightens you off, I guess that's up to you. It's the title. We're all just trying to not get bit. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebmour Goldmember  1,417 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada More info | Dec 06, 2007 10:22 | #12 GyRob wrote in post #3874321 no one will get confused - 1 doesen't work and the other might work  Rob. Thats not true mine works A1 in any conditions. Montreal and Destination wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth THREAD STARTER I'm comfortable with my masculinity 10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Dec 06, 2007 10:22 | #13 Yes. Read what I quoted again. The 1Ds mk.III should not be called 2D. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GyRob Cream of the Crop 10,206 posts Likes: 1413 Joined Feb 2005 Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK. More info | Dec 06, 2007 10:33 | #14 sebmour wrote in post #4450954 Thats not true mine works A1 in any conditions. I did put a "The LensMaster Gimbal"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Dec 06, 2007 10:38 | #15 If it was a 2D it would imply inferiority to the 5D Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1709 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
