Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 06 Sep 2007 (Thursday) 09:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

wide angle lens for national park visit?

 
aximrocks
Member
244 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Aug 2005
     
Sep 06, 2007 09:33 |  #1

I'm planning to visit banff national park next month. Currently I have a Tamron 28-75 F2.8 and EF 70-200 F4 on a Rebel XT. I was thinking about getting a good wide angle lens to replace the 18-55 kit lens. My budget is under CAD $1000. Which one would you pick?

EF-S 10-22mm F/3.5-4.5 (CAD $750 from B&H)
Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 (CAD $500)

Any recommendations on a good lens for landscapes?


Gear List
My Album (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,758 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 06, 2007 09:34 |  #2

sigma 10-20 :D


My gear
Fuji X-T2, Fringer Pro EF-X, 14 f2.8, 18-55 2.8-4 OIS, 35 f2, 50 f2, 90 f2, 55-200 3.5-4.8 OIS, Tamron 150-600 G2 VC
Sony RX100 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jacobsen1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,629 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Mt View, RI
     
Sep 06, 2007 09:36 |  #3

You will really want something in the 10~2X range... So look at either the Canon 10~22mm EF-S or the Sigma 10~20mm EX DC. If you ever plan on going FF the sigma 12~24mm EX DG is worth a look too.


My Gear List

my sites:
benjacobsenphoto.com (external link) | newschoolofphotography​.com (external link)
GND buyers FAQ

FOR SALE: 5Dii RRS L-bracket, 430II, 12mm macro tube PM ME!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Potisdad
Senior Member
Avatar
670 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Auckland NZ
     
Sep 06, 2007 09:38 |  #4

I would get the EFS 10-22, or the Sigma 10-20 is=f cost is a concern. You have 28 mm+ covered competently with th Tamron.


David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
squashed
Goldmember
Avatar
4,317 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 3200
Joined Oct 2006
Location: MidEastCali
     
Sep 06, 2007 09:40 |  #5

I have the Sigma 10-20. Unbeleivably glad I purchased it too.


Done with Numbers. Own the X and the R
http://www.garyyoungph​otography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HarleyQuinn
Lucky Lucy, or I'm on Crack?
You decide.
Avatar
2,472 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Where the winds come sweeping down the plains...
     
Sep 06, 2007 09:46 |  #6

Easy. Sigma 10-20. :)


Renee
~ My Gear~
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aximrocks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
244 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Aug 2005
     
Sep 06, 2007 10:11 as a reply to  @ HarleyQuinn's post |  #7

I've read the reviews of Sigma 10-20 and there were quite a few people mentioned softness on the right side. How does it compare to EF-S 10-22?


Gear List
My Album (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdev
Member
Avatar
121 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
     
Sep 06, 2007 10:14 |  #8

05Xrunner wrote in post #3873391 (external link)
sigma 10-20 :D

I second that one. I love my sigma. Here are some links to sample images I did with it. They aren't the greatest post process, but it gives you an idea of what it can do.

http://a195.ac-images.myspacecdn.com …e7d95a547fc52d2​01146a.jpg (external link)
http://a835.ac-images.myspacecdn.com …1b4ba288ce37f68​06e222.jpg (external link)


VisuallyImpliedPhotography (external link)
Canon 20D w/ BG-E2 | Canon 40D w/ BG-E2N
Sigma EX DG Macro DF 24-70mm f/2.8 | Sigma EX DC HSM 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon EF 18-55mm | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MKII | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,010 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1331
Joined May 2004
Location: Powell, WY
     
Sep 06, 2007 10:16 |  #9

The Canon 10-22 is the best lens, IQ wise, but I hear very good things about the Tokina 12-24.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdev
Member
Avatar
121 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
     
Sep 06, 2007 10:23 |  #10

RikWriter wrote in post #3873648 (external link)
The Canon 10-22 is the best lens, IQ wise, but I hear very good things about the Tokina 12-24.

I too have heard nothing but good things about the Tonika 12-24 (as well as the Canon 10-22). I would love to get my hands on either one and try them out.


VisuallyImpliedPhotography (external link)
Canon 20D w/ BG-E2 | Canon 40D w/ BG-E2N
Sigma EX DG Macro DF 24-70mm f/2.8 | Sigma EX DC HSM 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon EF 18-55mm | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MKII | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jsabs24
Member
96 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 06, 2007 10:43 as a reply to  @ jdev's post |  #11

I have the Tokina 12-24mm and use it on a Rebel XT and a 30D, it is an excellent lens, build quality is on par with canon L series. The manual to auto focus switch is also very cool.


My Flickr (external link)

My Gear: Canon 30D with grip, Sigma DG-300, 70-200 f/2.8 L, 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.8, 24mm f/1.4 L I.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike55
Goldmember
Avatar
4,206 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Sep 06, 2007 10:54 |  #12

aximrocks wrote in post #3873384 (external link)
I'm planning to visit banff national park next month. Currently I have a Tamron 28-75 F2.8 and EF 70-200 F4 on a Rebel XT. I was thinking about getting a good wide angle lens to replace the 18-55 kit lens. My budget is under CAD $1000. Which one would you pick?

EF-S 10-22mm F/3.5-4.5 (CAD $750 from B&H)
Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 (CAD $500)

Any recommendations on a good lens for landscapes?

17-40L. You don't need a super wide angle in Banff unless you are hiking in the canyons. What you do need is a lens capable of capturing the awesome natural colors of the area. The 10-22 will "shrink" most of the mountain landscape possibilites, reducing the impact of the mountains. I have seen so many shots from super wide angles make what were beautiful, impresive mountains turn into ant hills in a field. It's more of a cartoon than an actual nature shot, IMHO.

Trust me, a standard zoom lens will be much more useful in Banff, and will tell the story of that park in a more natural way.


6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana (external link)/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
packpe89
Senior Member
Avatar
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 06, 2007 11:32 |  #13

Another for the Tokina 12-24. Great lens, sharp and excellent build.


Canon 5D, 7D, 100-300F4, 200f2.8L, 17-40L, 50f1.4, 85f1.8, 15-85EF-S , Sigma 24-70f2.8, A couple of flashes, strobes and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rang
Goldmember
1,644 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 06, 2007 13:27 |  #14

Tokina 12-24 vote. f4 throughout the zoom range. Built like a tank. Matches up to a 1.6 sensor beautifully. Wide enough without distortion or fish eye look.


Lotsa stuff, running outta room and a wife...I keep looking at her and wondering??? :lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Sep 06, 2007 13:44 as a reply to  @ rang's post |  #15

How about the Tamron 11-18mm? You already have a Tamron so you are familiar with their IQ and build quality.

http://www.tamron.com/​lenses/prod/11_18mm.as​p (external link)

The only thing you have to be aware of is that this is a Di lens optimized for cameras with APS-C size sensors. If you mount this lens to a full-frame camera, such as the 5D, you'll experience severe vignetting at the edges.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,781 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
wide angle lens for national park visit?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
889 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.