I will preface this with a link to my current digital portfolio, so people can see what I am working with so far: www.stasisproductions.com/portfolio![]()
I am stuggling with the perceived impact of my digital portfolio. When I first started out, I threw whatever I thought was a "good" photo up on my portfolio. That means for each category on my site, I had 3-4 pages of photos.
As of late, I have cut that down to a max of 25 photos per category, but that is still over 100+ photos! I feel that many of the images are still lacking and I shouldn't be showing them off, but I am afraid of going "too small".
What are good ball park numbers how how big a general portfolio should be? I feel that I will still keep more specialized, larger portfolios for certain styles, i.e. have a live event coverage portfolio with 20 shots, an automotive portfolio with 20 shots, etc., but only have a certain amount visible to the public on my web site. The more specialized portfolios can be shown to clients interested in that specific type of photography, if they want to see more work.
From many of the best portfolios I have seen online, the photographer simply has 1 page of his/her best shots, regardless of what type of photo it is. They are usually approximately 20-30 of their cream of the crop, showing their core style, but also covering all the various types of photos they shoot (like product, portraits, event, etc.).
Is this the sort portfolio that I should be aiming for to carry more of an impact?

