daduls, just been into that link you provided - great stuff! Thanks mate.
Sep 11, 2007 17:06 | #16 daduls, just been into that link you provided - great stuff! Thanks mate. 60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
00silvergt "some dorky title"  3,309 posts Likes: 6 Joined May 2007 Location: Vacaville, CA More info | Sep 13, 2007 13:38 | #17 Are you related to Colin Mcrae? LOL Jim, it will not be very noticeable in IQ difference for portraits between the 1.4 and the 1.8. At least not to the point you will be patting yourself on the back for paying 3X the amount for the 1.4. If you have to have the best IQ in 50mm, then I would say, if money is really not the issue, to go get the 50mm f1.2L that would be much better in IQ in either the 1.4 or the 1.8. However, it will be 10x the amount of the 1.8. Then there's the 35mm L... "Ne nuntium necare"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
numbersix fully entitled to be jealous  8,964 posts Likes: 109 Joined May 2007 Location: SF Bay Area More info | Sep 13, 2007 14:15 | #18 Just a thought: if low light shooting isn't particularly important, you might consider the 60mm f/2.8 macro as a replacement. It's a fun lens and very sharp... "Be seeing you."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2881 guests, 177 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
