Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Sep 2007 (Tuesday) 08:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

400 D intermittent dark exposure

 
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 11, 2007 08:09 |  #1

I just got a used 400D and occasionally I get a dark exposure. I looked at the exposure data in Light Room and it is almost identical to the previous one. The histrogram show all of the visual information shifted to the left. When I tweak the image in Light Room the Photo looks normal and the Histrogram of course is changed.
Anyone have this issue with a 400D or heard of it before?


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ephemeral
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK (London)
     
Sep 11, 2007 08:12 |  #2

I'm not being funny, but you'll need to give a little more than that. What sort of conditions where you shooting in? What mode? What was you shooting? Any examples? Did you use flash? Where you shooting bursts?

All these things can affect the images your camera produces.


Canon 5D + Grip | 85mm L f/1.2 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | [COLOR=Silver]24-70mm L f/2.8 |[COLOR=Black] 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | Speedlite 580EX & 430EX | Manfrotto 190Pro + 488RC2
ephemeral.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pieq314
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Sep 11, 2007 08:12 |  #3

Are you using flash? If yes, then, it could be because the flash did not fire.

Please post two photos, one just before the dark photo, and the dark photo itself.


Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Sep 11, 2007 09:12 |  #4

pieq314 wrote in post #3906590 (external link)
Are you using flash? If yes, then, it could be because the flash did not fire.

If the settings were the same (i.e aperture, shutter speed and ISO didn't change between exposure) and then this is the only think I can think of that would produce a darker frame. As suggested, example photos with the EXIF data would be most helpful.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Sep 11, 2007 09:15 as a reply to  @ Mark_Cohran's post |  #5

yup - photos please ???


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 11, 2007 11:23 |  #6

Thanks Guys.. Photos would help !!!! I will post them tomorrow :)... I thought there might be a known issue that I was not aware of.. No flash by the way... daylight and full auto. More with picts to follow !!!


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 12, 2007 07:21 |  #7

Here is the first shot:
http://s187.photobucke​t.com …ew¤t=IsmM​G_0917.jpg (external link)
File size: 286795 bytes
File date: 2007:09:12 06:15:57
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Date/Time: 2007:09:09 15:03:06
Resolution: 1024 x 683
Flash used: No
Focal length: 55.0mm (35mm equivalent: 89mm)
CCD width: 22.28mm
Exposure time: 0.0080 s (1/125)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv.: 400
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure: program (auto)

Here is the second one
http://s187.photobucke​t.com …ew¤t=smIM​G_0921.jpg (external link)
File size: 233992 bytes
File date: 2007:09:12 06:16:10
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Date/Time: 2007:09:09 15:06:15
Resolution: 1024 x 683
Flash used: No
Focal length: 55.0mm (35mm equivalent: 89mm)
CCD width: 22.28mm
Exposure time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
Aperture: f/11.0
ISO equiv.: 400
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure: program (auto)

The


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Az2Africa
Goldmember
Avatar
3,481 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, Arizona USA
     
Sep 12, 2007 08:15 |  #8

Looks like the glare off the water from slightly different angles just fooled the exposure. the first set exposure off a darker area in the scene and the second exposed off the glare on the water. Just my thoughts.


"If you're not living on the edge. You're taking up too much room !"
My Gear Arizona's POTN Flickr Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 12, 2007 08:37 |  #9

Well it clear from the EXIF why it’s darker, shutter speed from 1/125 to 1/250 and from f/8 to f/11. You got a whole lot less light on the sensor for ½ the time. As to why, I like Az2Africa’s answer, the reflection fooled the meter. These types of shots love polarizing filters to cut the glare.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ephemeral
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK (London)
     
Sep 12, 2007 10:29 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #10

I'd go with the metering too.

Look at all your shots where you think it's darker and see if there is a large area of white or light colour. Like the glare off the water in your example, or a patch of sky between tree coverage, etc.


Canon 5D + Grip | 85mm L f/1.2 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | [COLOR=Silver]24-70mm L f/2.8 |[COLOR=Black] 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | Speedlite 580EX & 430EX | Manfrotto 190Pro + 488RC2
ephemeral.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 12, 2007 14:46 |  #11

My thanks to everyone for taking time to read my post and answer my question. I have been shooting for quite a while but this is my first trip into the DIGITAL SLR world. I guess I was looking for sensor failure not So I do appreciate everyones help. I guesss I should have looked at the exposure data closer. The second shot is two stops under. After a little Photoshop, it is amazing the detail that I was able to get back. I agree with Az2Africa. It was probably the reflection throwing off the meter. Its a new era but the old rules still apply..Many thanks !!!


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,305 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
400 D intermittent dark exposure
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2878 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.