Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Sep 2007 (Friday) 03:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Manual Focus with XT/XTi

 
Pixel9ine
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 14, 2007 03:16 |  #1

I've had my XT for a year and a half and while AF has been consistently accurate, I've always had problems with Manual focus since day one.

I would focus the XT and get a sharp image in the viewfinder, but the recorded picture would be front-focused by a consistent amount. I used a focus chart to confirm this. However, images taken with the camera's AF were spot-on - no problems, even down to f/1.4. The problem was too consistent and too precise to be accounted to operator error - but I wasn't able to explain why.

Now, I'd read about swapping in third-party focusing screens (such as the Haoda and Katz Eye screens), and interestingly the review of the Haoda mentioned removing the copper shim (far left in this image (external link)) when installing their screen; it said you didn't need it. So, yesterday I removed the shim, reinstalled the OEM screen and tested the camera with my f/1.4-1.8 primes -shot wide open- and, surprisingly, Manual Focus is now much improved, almost totally accurate. 100% comparisons between the camera's AF and my manually-focused shots now only occasionally shows a very small amount of deviation, which I'm willing to say is operator error.

So what I'm wondering is:

  • Has anyone else had the same kind of consistent problem with Manual Focus on their XT/XTi? (by comparison my 30D has flawless MF ability)
  • Has anyone else tried removing this shim? With what results?
  • Why would Canon place a shim in there that appears totally useless (or is the wrong thickness)?

Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 14, 2007 03:20 |  #2

As a side point, I've anecdotally heard that Canon only designed the XT to be accurate with 2.8 or slower lenses - if so, that might explain why this issue exists and went unfixed during the two visits my XT had to Canon's Service Centre..

EDIT:
It might also explain why I didn't notice the problem at first while using my F4 zooms - the more I got into using fast primes, the more obvious it became..


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raymate
Goldmember
1,736 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto. CA - Bedford. UK
     
Sep 14, 2007 03:25 |  #3

I have the same problem, hardly every use manual focus now :(


Canon: EOS 5DmkII • 50D • 40D • 350D • 100 f2.8L IS Macro • 70-200 f4L • 24-105 f4L IS • 17-40 f4L • 50 f1.4 • 60 f2.8 Macro • 85 f1.8 • 430EX • 580EX II • ST-E2
Sigma: 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC HSM • 30 f1.4 EX DC HSM • 17-50 f2.8 EX • 24-70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO
Apple: CS3, Aperture & iPhoto. Various Manfrotto, Portaflash, Battery Grips, SanDisk & Lowepro

alamy: my stock photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Sep 14, 2007 03:35 |  #4

Uhh, MF "ability" is dependent on the user's fingers not the camera or lens. If you manually focus then what you see is what you get. The only way I know of that could throw this off is if your focus screen is out of alignment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raymate
Goldmember
1,736 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto. CA - Bedford. UK
     
Sep 14, 2007 03:44 |  #5

Then my focus screen may be a tad out, as I'm very good with the focus ring and the image look sharp in the viewfinder but the image is not focus on the point I did it.

We are only talking a tad for me, but the auto get's it every time so i'm not worried. I use single centre AF point anyway. :)


Canon: EOS 5DmkII • 50D • 40D • 350D • 100 f2.8L IS Macro • 70-200 f4L • 24-105 f4L IS • 17-40 f4L • 50 f1.4 • 60 f2.8 Macro • 85 f1.8 • 430EX • 580EX II • ST-E2
Sigma: 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC HSM • 30 f1.4 EX DC HSM • 17-50 f2.8 EX • 24-70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO
Apple: CS3, Aperture & iPhoto. Various Manfrotto, Portaflash, Battery Grips, SanDisk & Lowepro

alamy: my stock photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 14, 2007 03:57 |  #6

gooble wrote in post #3927226 (external link)
If you manually focus then what you see is what you get.

That's true 99% of the time but not in this case; this appears to be an XT/XTi-specific problem. As I said, my 30D is dead accurate, as I imagine your 20D is. The issue with my XT seems to be a clear case of focusing screen miscalibration - I'm interested to see how many others have the same issue...

Raymate wrote in post #3927257 (external link)
auto get's it every time so i'm not worried. I use single centre AF point anyway.

That was my workaround (other than buying a 30D ;-)a) - I use C.Fn.4-1 and center AF point.. even so, my now zero-calibrated viewfinder is closer to a true "What You See Is What You Get" image. YMMV.


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mellowd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: South African in London, UK
     
Sep 14, 2007 04:03 |  #7

What lens are you using? Is this problem only coming up with one or more of your lenses?


5D : 17-40L : 85 f1.8 : 135L f2.0L - Full Gear List Here!
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 14, 2007 04:14 |  #8

mellowd wrote in post #3927309 (external link)
What lens are you using? Is this problem only coming up with one or more of your lenses?

The issue was most noticeable with my primes, especially at close working distances:
- 30mm 1.4
- 50mm 1.8
- 85mm 1.8

...but I'd also noticed it with my 17-85 and 70-200 at low apertures. The only lens where I hadn't noticed any problems was the 10-20mm, which is more-than-likely due to the immense DoF of an UWA.

AF has always been accurate with all the above lenses on both the XT and 30D; IMO eliminating any chance the lenses themselves were faulty.


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcogger
Goldmember
2,554 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Sep 14, 2007 06:21 |  #9

Have you adjusted the diopter on the XT?


Graeme
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreyD
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Sep 14, 2007 07:02 |  #10

I also hardly can manualy focus my 400D with 50mm f/1.4 wide open. It appears sharp on viewfinder and not after shot done. I do not know what to do, I have been one opinion that my camera is OK, it's just very narrow DOF. Auto focusing always perfect


Andrey
Moscow, Russia
flickr (external link)|blogger (external link)|facebook (external link)|livejournal (external link)|project365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 14, 2007 07:08 |  #11

gcogger wrote in post #3927702 (external link)
Have you adjusted the diopter on the XT?

...Yes. The diopter setting was not at fault. Good question though.


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackProton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,348 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 14, 2007 16:48 |  #12

Pixel9ine wrote in post #3927198 (external link)
As a side point, I've anecdotally heard that Canon only designed the XT to be accurate with 2.8 or slower lenses - if so, that might explain why this issue exists and went unfixed during the two visits my XT had to Canon's Service Centre..

EDIT:
It might also explain why I didn't notice the problem at first while using my F4 zooms - the more I got into using fast primes, the more obvious it became..

Well, unlike the XTi, 30D, etc. the XT wasn't designed with any higher precision focusing points for f2.8 and faster lenses. As a consequence, the XT's auto-focus isn't always quite accurate enough for narrow DOF shots. I'm not sure if this explains anything about your manual focusing issue though.

Canon's entry level dSLR models, however, aren't really designed for pro-level manual focusing -- the viewing screen isn't as bright as the semi-pro and pro models, for example. There is probably little call for tweaking XT view finder screens for precise manual focusing and there may simply not be any procedure or mechanism for doing so at Canon Factgory Service except in gross terms. This, I think, may be a very good reason for considering a camera upgrade in your case.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 14, 2007 20:47 |  #13

In my experience, my XT's AF has been absolutely accurate for static subjects - this with every lens I've used it with, from my own primes right up to a rented 300mm 2.8 - lenses whose razor-thin DoF don't leave much room for AF error. My issue was not with the cameras autofocus abilities.

Furthermore, while I understand the XT's small, dim viewfinder makes it difficult to manuall focus with ease (hence why there is a market for third-party screens), I found myself consistently misfocusing by a precise and measurable amount - something that can't be attributed to design inadequacies - rather, this seemed to be a precise, replicable error brought on by a precise, correctable miscalibration.

My shock and surprise stems from the fact that removing the copper shim - which I imagine served to calibrate the position of the focus screen - resulted in a more accurate (almost spot-on) ability to manually focus.

I'd still like to know if any fellow XT/XTi owners who experience the same problem have tried what I've done, and what the results have been. (Or if there are any adventurous enough to try it and check the results..)

JackProton wrote in post #3931070 (external link)
This, I think, may be a very good reason for considering a camera upgrade in your case.

Not only have I considered it, I've been a satisfied 30D owner for some time now - a camera which has allowed for accurate MF right out of the box. I'm simply glad that with a little correction, both my bodies now have this ability.


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackProton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,348 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 15, 2007 00:02 |  #14

Well, I believe its a possibility that the "misfocusing by a precise and measurable amount" to the degree you experienced may still be within the tolerences to which the XT was designed and manufactured. While you or I might find these tolerences to include an unacceptable degree of error at either statistical extreme, Canon still may have felt them acceptable for an entry-level camera. Considering the auto-focus issues I experienced with my own XT and the inability of Canon Factory Service to "properly" calibrate my camera after three tries, I have wondered more than once if looser design tolerences weren't part of the cost savings measures used to create such a relatively inexpensive but full-featured camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 15, 2007 13:43 |  #15

Do you think the shim under the focusing screen was intended to be used as an adjustment? Obviously not by the user, but perhaps by Canon service?

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,788 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Manual Focus with XT/XTi
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
1488 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.