Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Sep 2007 (Saturday) 04:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Safe to say 40D has no AF problems?

 
Crashoran
Goldmember
Avatar
1,734 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Austin,Texas
     
Sep 15, 2007 04:28 |  #1

I am going to upgrade from a 1D to the 40D. Is there a large chance that the 40D I receive choose will have AF issues like the M3?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Sep 15, 2007 04:37 |  #2

Of all the 40D's that seem to be have been bought, and people with them on the forums, not just this forum either, only think I saw one person complaining of an AF issue, I cannot remember if it was a user fault or camera, but I think he exchange camera and was happy with replacement


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Sep 15, 2007 04:41 |  #3

Yeah I heard the "Random AF Surprise" was included as a freebie for expensive camera owners. We buying the lower end have to miss out :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Sep 15, 2007 04:43 |  #4

Lightstream wrote in post #3934211 (external link)
Yeah I heard the "Random AF Surprise" was included as a freebie for expensive camera owners. We buying the lower end have to miss out :lol:

Yes sometimes i hate haveing so much spare cash:lol:
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Sep 15, 2007 04:46 |  #5

GyRob wrote in post #3934218 (external link)
Yes sometimes i hate haveing so much spare cash:lol:
Rob.

Glad you could see the humor :) basically, the 40D doesn't seem to have any AF issues that I'm aware of.

Also, here's to hoping your 1D3 gets fixed soon!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:01 |  #6

I've been wondering this myself as it seems at least some of the same technology from the MkIII is in the 40D. I'm leaning very heavily towards getting rid of the MkIII and 20D and adding a 40D to go with my 5D.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:04 |  #7

kenyc wrote in post #3934280 (external link)
I've been wondering this myself as it seems at least some of the same technology from the MkIII is in the 40D. I'm leaning very heavily towards getting rid of the MkIII and 20D and adding a 40D to go with my 5D.

KAC

You should Kenny. I feel bad that you are going through all these problems with your MKIII. The 40D maybe your answer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:08 |  #8

jdizzle wrote in post #3934290 (external link)
You should Kenny. I feel bad that you are going through all these problems with your MKIII. The 40D maybe your answer.


That's what I'm thinking. :) I love the features of the MkIII, but if I can't trust it to get the shots my 20D does then it's not worth using.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:13 |  #9

I'd say quite a lot of the 1D3's technology, a lot more than I expected, was migrated down to the 40D. If the features overlap, you might want to consider that camera.

Myself I value reliability - it's one of my highest priorities. I'll take a lesser-performing piece of hardware (speaking in general) that's dead rock solid reliable over the latest and greatest.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:38 |  #10

Lightstream wrote in post #3934310 (external link)
I'd say quite a lot of the 1D3's technology, a lot more than I expected, was migrated down to the 40D. If the features overlap, you might want to consider that camera.

Myself I value reliability - it's one of my highest priorities. I'll take a lesser-performing piece of hardware (speaking in general) that's dead rock solid reliable over the latest and greatest.

I agree completely with the reliability statement! As far as the technology, I would assume/hope that Canon research/development works on the base technologies independent of any product offering and when the technology is ready it is incorporated into particular products as part of that individual product's development.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:40 |  #11

kenyc wrote in post #3934280 (external link)
I've been wondering this myself as it seems at least some of the same technology from the MkIII is in the 40D. I'm leaning very heavily towards getting rid of the MkIII and 20D and adding a 40D to go with my 5D.

KAC

TBH if you sold your mark 3, bought a 40D ,,,, waited a while, see if mark 3 gets sorted, get another one if you really need the speed again and low noose ISO ETC, the 40D is so good you will not lose a lot of money on it, be plenty of buyers looking for a slightly cheaper one. also I think you would be pleasantly surprised how good the 40D is for what it cost


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:49 |  #12

MaDProFF wrote in post #3934377 (external link)
TBH if you sold your mark 3, bought a 40D ,,,, waited a while, see if mark 3 gets sorted, get another one if you really need the speed again and low noose ISO ETC, the 40D is so good you will not lose a lot of money on it, be plenty of buyers looking for a slightly cheaper one. also I think you would be pleasantly surprised how good the 40D is for what it cost

I love my 20D so likely would love the 40D as well. The 5D is incredible in it's own way with full frame and it's resolution so it's not going anywhere. :)

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeI
Goldmember
Avatar
2,074 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: NorCal
     
Sep 15, 2007 05:52 |  #13

I'm a little concerned about my 40D. I'm having issues w/ the AI servo at distances. It appears to be focusing the right target, but the results are fairly soft. I still haven't given it a fair shake yet. I tried last week, but something came up every day. I shot some flying black tailed kites today. I expected them to be stellar, but was less than pleased when I uploaded them.

My issues have mainly been when I am using my 300 f/4 IS. I haven't noticed the same w/ other lenses. This lens on my XTi is superb, so I can rule out the lens. When using the 300 for macro or other close (less than 30' or so) shots, they look perfect. It is mainly when shooting wildlife that I have noticed it.

I am still just writing it off as user error. If I'm still having problems in a week, then I'll get worried about it.


Doubleshot Photography (external link) ~~~~~ [URL="[URL]http://phot​ography-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=3138451&postcou​nt=595"]My Gear ~~~~~ [URL="[URL]http://irel​and-photo.smugmug.com/"]Pe​rsonal Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 15, 2007 06:16 |  #14

MikeI wrote in post #3934417 (external link)
I'm a little concerned about my 40D. I'm having issues w/ the AI servo at distances. It appears to be focusing the right target, but the results are fairly soft. I still haven't given it a fair shake yet. I tried last week, but something came up every day. I shot some flying black tailed kites today. I expected them to be stellar, but was less than pleased when I uploaded them.

My issues have mainly been when I am using my 300 f/4 IS. I haven't noticed the same w/ other lenses. This lens on my XTi is superb, so I can rule out the lens. When using the 300 for macro or other close (less than 30' or so) shots, they look perfect. It is mainly when shooting wildlife that I have noticed it.

I am still just writing it off as user error. If I'm still having problems in a week, then I'll get worried about it.

Hmmmm. I want to hear more, please do keep me/us posted.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,358 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 2731
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Sep 15, 2007 07:31 |  #15

Crashoran,
I have been very happy with AF on my 40D. It is so much more accurate then my 5D or 10D AF by a large........ amount. So much so that I am actually using it, where on my other cameras I very rarely if ever used AF because my hand and eye was more accurate. ;) Heck the AF was even great with 40D and my cheap 75-300 f/4-5.6 III lens :lol:
However I don't know how it would compare to your 1D? ??? as there are only 9 points


Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,459 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Safe to say 40D has no AF problems?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2791 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.