Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Sep 2007 (Saturday) 07:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

why is the recycle time so bad on the internal flash 400D

 
AussieCat
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 15, 2007 07:52 |  #1

why is the recycle time so bad on the internal flash 400D

is it just my camera?

could it have a fault as such?

as - the internal flash takes anything from 1-15 seconds to
recycle (recaharge)

until i can take another image with the flash.

i have a 430 external flahs and the recycle time seems quiet good on the whole
as expected form an external flash

but is it acceptable for the internal flash to take so long?

when i bought the canera new 1 year ago - im sure it seemed faster the recyle time?

can it be any factors that effect it over time as well?


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:16 |  #2

???

AussieCat wrote in post #3934753 (external link)
why is the recycle time so bad on the internal flash 400D

is it just my camera?

could it have a fault as such?

as - the internal flash takes anything from 1-10 seconds to
recycle (recaharge)

until i can take another image with the flash.

i have a 430 external flahs and the recycle time seems quiet good on the whole
as expected form an external flash

but is it acceptable for the internal flash to take so long?

when i bought the canera new 1 year ago - im sure it seemed faster the recyle time?

can it be any factors that effect it over time as well?


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:26 |  #3

I've never intentionally used the internal flash but you're comparing a several hundred dollar flash to one that is a fraction of the size and cost, so I think that may be the answer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:30 |  #4

um,

the 430 ex flash is only $400 aussie dollars but i know what your saying ....

but still

yeah, im just asking, is 1-15 secs recycle time normal for a 400d (XTI)

gooble wrote in post #3939706 (external link)
I've never intentionally used the internal flash but you're comparing a several hundred dollar flash to one that is a fraction of the size and cost, so I think that may be the answer.


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
khall
Goldmember
3,803 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Wollongong Australia.
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:41 |  #5

I have just tested my 300D with it's built in flash and will fire every 2 to 3 seconds, is your battery charged?


YNWA.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dellboy
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Ipswich Suffolk U.K.
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:41 |  #6

15secs seems way to long to me.

The only thing I can think would cause this is if the battery is nearly dead. Give it a recharge and try it again if you haven't done this already.

Other factors can speed up the flashes recycle time but none should cause it to take 15secs

If a recharge doesn't work then I think it's gotta go back to Canon :-(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dellboy
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Ipswich Suffolk U.K.
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:42 |  #7

Khall - you beat me to it :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Sep 16, 2007 04:44 |  #8

15 seconds does sound too long. Perhaps it is a bad capacitor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:04 |  #9

yeah, fully charged batteries and still the recycle time is

anything between 2-12 seconds.... gets slowers as batter life wears out i think...

damn, dont know if its worth taking to canon, they'll probally do nothing.

khall wrote in post #3939743 (external link)
I have just tested my 300D with it's built in flash and will fire every 2 to 3 seconds, is your battery charged?


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:15 |  #10

i just turned my camera on,

i took about 25 shots in a row with good recycle time,

after that, it took about 4-11 seonds till its lets me take the next shot (recycle time)

hmmm....

maybey i just have to accept it.

i tend to take heaps of pics consecutively - so maybe most people sont do that with an internal flash.


AussieCat wrote in post #3939796 (external link)
yeah, fully charged batteries and still the recycle time is

anything between 2-12 seconds.... gets slowers as batter life wears out i think...

damn, dont know if its worth taking to canon, they'll probally do nothing.


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
khall
Goldmember
3,803 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Wollongong Australia.
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:17 |  #11

A/Cat.
I am sure you will know that Canon Service is at North Ryde. I had a problem now about a year ago with the mirror return spring, phone and e-mail service was hopeless. I then took it to the Service Dept, they had it for 4 days, now all OK again.


YNWA.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:19 |  #12

wow - someone who is in sydney too.

yeah - i took my external 430 flash ther 2 weeks ago, they were great

rthey replaced it witha 580 model 5 days later.

as they made some error / said it was unecomical and upgraded at no cost.

hence - i was using th einternal of late asnd it just shocking for taking pics consecutively

khall wrote in post #3939833 (external link)
A/Cat.
I am sure you will know that Canon Service is at North Ryde. I had a problem now about a year ago with the mirror return spring, phone and e-mail service was hopeless. I then took it to the Service Dept, they had it for 4 days, now all OK again.


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:22 |  #13

hmm

after taking about 17 shots consecutively - at a good refresh rate of

2-6 seconds ,

would u have the same view if the recylce time became

only on average 5-10 seonds after taking the initial 17 shots when first turning on canera???



Dellboy wrote in post #3939744 (external link)
15secs seems way to long to me.

The only thing I can think would cause this is if the battery is nearly dead. Give it a recharge and try it again if you haven't done this already.

Other factors can speed up the flashes recycle time but none should cause it to take 15secs

If a recharge doesn't work then I think it's gotta go back to Canon :-(


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:24 |  #14

sorry man- what do u mean capacitor.

gooble wrote in post #3939750 (external link)
15 seconds does sound too long. Perhaps it is a bad capacitor.


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dellboy
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Ipswich Suffolk U.K.
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:39 |  #15

Sounds to me like you've been giving that poor flash a serious working:lol:

Generally I'd say if you're working your flash that hard then I'd use an external flash.

If you put that much stress on a cheep flash ( relatively ) then it's likely to burn out - maybe you've done this already. There also maybe a auto cutout where if your flash gets to hot it stops working and allows it to cool down. This maybe where your 15 secs recharge/cool down time comes from.

I would say anything over 3 ( maybe 4 ) secs recharge time would be abnormal, under normal usage. If your camera can't do that for maybe 6 shots or so then I'd say there is a fault of some kind. Could be the flash's capacitor or maybe a faulty/old battery that can't hold much charge and hence it drains very quickly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,856 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
why is the recycle time so bad on the internal flash 400D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2812 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.