Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Sep 2007 (Saturday) 07:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

why is the recycle time so bad on the internal flash 400D

 
Dellboy
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Ipswich Suffolk U.K.
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:41 |  #16

Capacitor is the "bit" which holds the flashes charge before it is discharged as a flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luukie
Member
101 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:45 |  #17

Don't forget the AF strobe guys..sometimes in low light conditions when AF is searching for a focus I can't take a photo when it finally focused on the object, because the af strobe drained the capacitor...then I have to wait or a while..and try again... :S


400D, Canon 70-200 f4, Tamron 17-50 f2.8, Canon 50 f1.4, 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:52 |  #18

hmmm.

i think i know what your saying
but i dont think thats it, as it says "busy" in the LCD until its ready to take next shot with flash.

luukie wrote in post #3939892 (external link)
Don't forget the AF strobe guys..sometimes in low light conditions when AF is searching for a focus I can't take a photo when it finally focused on the object, because the af strobe drained the capacitor...then I have to wait or a while..and try again... :S


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 16, 2007 05:55 |  #19

dellboy,

i hear what you are saying,

under "normal" usage, my flash seems "ok" then, as i can get atleast 10-15 shots in a row (good recycle time of 2-5 seonds) from the moment i turn it on fresh - its after that - that it slows down and takes longer....

but are u saying that cause i take pics consecutively (more than 15 shots in a row) (then keep taking shots every 10 seconds for a duration of a 5-15 photo shoot)

- are u saying that this is abnormal therfor its expected

ha

Dellboy wrote in post #3939881 (external link)
Sounds to me like you've been giving that poor flash a serious working:lol:

Generally I'd say if you're working your flash that hard then I'd use an external flash.

If you put that much stress on a cheep flash ( relatively ) then it's likely to burn out - maybe you've done this already. There also maybe a auto cutout where if your flash gets to hot it stops working and allows it to cool down. This maybe where your 15 secs recharge/cool down time comes from.

I would say anything over 3 ( maybe 4 ) secs recharge time would be abnormal, under normal usage. If your camera can't do that for maybe 6 shots or so then I'd say there is a fault of some kind. Could be the flash's capacitor or maybe a faulty/old battery that can't hold much charge and hence it drains very quickly.


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dellboy
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Ipswich Suffolk U.K.
     
Sep 16, 2007 06:00 |  #20

AussieCat wrote in post #3939920 (external link)
ok dellboy,

i hear what you are saying,

under "normal" usage, my flash seems ok,

but are u saying that cause i take pics consecutively (more than 15 shots in a row) (then keep taking shots every 10 seconds for about 5 mins)

- are u saying that this is abnormal therfor its expected

ha

That's one way of putting it :lol:

Another way of putting it is:
I've never worked the on camera flash that hard so i would really know what to expect.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riverlander
Senior Member
Avatar
686 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Riverland, South Australia
     
Sep 16, 2007 08:13 |  #21

Are you taking into account the time the camera takes to process your run of pics? I don't think anything else happens if the camera's buffer is full.


Canon; 7D with grip, EF-S 10-22, EF 24-105L, 580EX II flash, 550EX flash, 430EX flash, Sigma; 18-50 f/2.8, 50-150 f/2.8, 120-300 f/2.8, 50-500 f/4.5-6.3 OS, 30 f/1.4, 150 Macro; Sigma APO 1.4x and 2x converters, Benro M-257 tripod & B-1 ballhead. Wimberley Sidekick. Lots of other stuff.http://riverlander.smu​gmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 16, 2007 09:02 |  #22

Dellboy wrote in post #3939886 (external link)
Capacitor is the "bit" which holds the flashes charge before it is discharged as a flash.

I really doubt it is a capacitor problem. These things don't have all that much that can go wrong. It's not like the old days with the paper and oil capacitors.

But one thing you might want to check out is the battery. Lithium-ion batteries failure signature is the inability to deliver current. The voltage stays very constant but it doesn't have the ability to supply the voltage at a specified current. If it's an older battery, or a third party battery, it might be a symptom that the battery is nearing its life expectancy.

Riverlander wrote in post #3940335 (external link)
Are you taking into account the time the camera takes to process your run of pics? I don't think anything else happens if the camera's buffer is full.

The 400 has a pretty decent buffer. It can rattle off quite a few shots before slowing down.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UNDRCOVR
Member
Avatar
32 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Western Australia
     
Sep 17, 2007 01:59 |  #23

aussiecat.. i found the same problem with my 400D.. but the internal flash shouldn't have to be used that much.. luukie mentioned what i was thinking.. the strobe to find focus usually drains lots out of the flash also..

if u got a 580EX now, then the internal flash issues shouldn't bother u..

i haven't got an external flash yet, but i rarely use the internal flash now.. i borrow a mates 430 if i know i need flash..

t


*Canon 400D | Casio EX-Z750 (P&S - backup)
*EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Speedlite 580EX II + bits 'n' pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 17, 2007 03:30 |  #24

hahah

good point,. i do have the 580 ex which im yet to evenb open.

i guyess i just wanted to make sure my camera s not somewhat faulty and its ok to have a slow recycle time after taking so many shots.

good point about the pre/strobe flash trying to find a focus...

if i turn my camera on fresh right now, ill get a bout 15-20 fresh shots without a slow buffer ./ recycle time.

after that, itrs had it, it takes about up to 10 seconds per buffer/recycle time.

but like a few guys pointed out, i do take to manyt hsots with the internal flash in a 5-15 min time frame.

UNDRCOVR wrote in post #3945678 (external link)
aussiecat.. i found the same problem with my 400D.. but the internal flash shouldn't have to be used that much.. luukie mentioned what i was thinking.. the strobe to find focus usually drains lots out of the flash also..

if u got a 580EX now, then the internal flash issues shouldn't bother u..

i haven't got an external flash yet, but i rarely use the internal flash now.. i borrow a mates 430 if i know i need flash..

t


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Sep 18, 2007 13:04 |  #25

AussieCat wrote in post #3939911 (external link)
hmmm.

i think i know what your saying
but i dont think thats it, as it says "busy" in the LCD until its ready to take next shot with flash.

That's not waiting for the flash. The flash ready light (LH side of the VF) will come on when the flash has recycled; "Busy" means the buffer doesn't have room for any more shots. If you look over to the RH side of the VF, you'll see a number between 0 and 9. This is how many shots the buffer has room for (it shows 9 if there's room for 9 or more shots).


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 20, 2007 04:42 |  #26

no thats new

and confused me.

when that "busy" sign comes up on the lcd, it can come up ant any time

even if my card io only 40 percent full?

so how do u mean as such its full?

the buffer?

Jon wrote in post #3956864 (external link)
That's not waiting for the flash. The flash ready light (LH side of the VF) will come on when the flash has recycled; "Busy" means the buffer doesn't have room for any more shots. If you look over to the RH side of the VF, you'll see a number between 0 and 9. This is how many shots the buffer has room for (it shows 9 if there's room for 9 or more shots).


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AussieCat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 20, 2007 04:46 |  #27

ok

so what actualy affects teh buffer time?

i formateted my card and it still had a long buffer time as such even whenn the card is empty...

AussieCat wrote in post #3969375 (external link)
no thats new

and confused me.

when that "busy" sign comes up on the lcd, it can come up ant any time

even if my card io only 40 percent full?

so how do u mean as such its full?

the buffer?


= Canon 50D Body
= 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
= 580 Series II External Flash
= Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilg
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Sep 20, 2007 06:15 |  #28

The manual states that flash recylce times will increase after taking a number (20 mentioned in the manual) of flashes to protect the electronics of the flash charging mechanism.

http://static.tigerdir​ect.com/pdf/Canon-XTi400D-Manual.pdf (external link) See page 54.
Looking at your quote you are experiencing what is documented in the manual. So it's normal, not a fault.

just turned my camera on,

i took about 25 shots in a row with good recycle time,

after that, it took about 4-11 seonds till its lets me take the next shot (recycle time)

Secondly I read an "unofficial" change in the latest firmware release that the flash recycle time had been improved (i.e that the busy sign should come up after 20 shots and not after about 5 as it did previously), but have not tested this myself, so maybe the latest firmware might help if you don't already have it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Sep 20, 2007 10:54 |  #29

The "buffer" is a block of memory in the camera that serves as a temporary holding area for photos before they're written to the card. It's set up so that it can be written to very quickly, but can empty data on to the card at a slower pace. It's basically "disk caching" for your camera.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
convergent
Goldmember
Avatar
2,244 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Emerald Isle, NC
     
Sep 20, 2007 11:36 |  #30

Recycle time is going to vary by two factors... the charge on the battery, and the power of the previous flash. If you are pretty much in the dark and requiring max power from the flash, it will take a lot longer to recycle than if you were outdoors in the sun and just using it for fill flash. So trying to compare recycle times with other folks here without a context on the conditions you are shooting in is an impossible task. I would say that 15 seconds sounds way to long to me, but in order to do a real test with another body, you need to make sure you are in the same situation with the same settings.


Mike
R6 II - RF 100-500L f/4.5-7.1 IS - EF 17-40L f/4 - 24-70L f/2.8 II - 70-200L f/2.8 IS II -
135L f/2 - 100 f/2.8 Macro - Siggy 15 f/2.8 Fisheye - RF TC1.4 - EF TC1.4 II - TC2 III - (2) 600EX-RT - ST-E3-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,859 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
why is the recycle time so bad on the internal flash 400D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2735 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.