theflyingkiwi wrote in post #4160699
but your right. it's a shame we can't take photos with out batteries these days.
i dunno, im quite happy to use batteries now that they are rechargeable: i had an EOS 500 which took 2xlithium ion batteries, which cost $28-$32 a set and lasted for approximately 6-8 films (depending on how much on-camera flash was used) and then became little logs of useless e-waste, and the camera reverted to a pointless lump of electronica until i could get new batteries. certainly put the cost of photography up.
also i would never want to do without all the features my modern camera has that are made possible by batteries - autofocus, autoexposure, free photos forever (ccd)... not to mention chimping 