Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Sep 2007 (Tuesday) 06:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AFAssist...

 
tipsy
*hic
Avatar
590 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Cardiff
     
Sep 18, 2007 06:20 |  #1

Interest was sparked by something a particular someone said in another thread.

How many of you use external flashes, set to not fire, with the AF assist function enabled when shooting at concerts? Does it work well? What is the general feeling of how ethical this is? Would it, in your opinion, piss of performers to the point of slashing you with their guitars, impaling you on their drumsticks, and destroying your earphones by tying your head to a 1000w speaker using a stray xlr cable?

x


www.racmedia.co.uk (external link)
TV Cameraman and Photographer
EOS 5D + 24-70mm f2.8 are my main weapons of choice.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bacchanal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,284 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
     
Sep 18, 2007 07:16 |  #2

I've done it a couple times and it worked pretty well...of course I'm generally relatively close to the subject. I don't think any rock act would take notice of the AF assist beam...most don't even seem to notice the flash. I probably wouldn't use it when shooting a folk artist in an intimate setting or something like that. Really though, in my experience I've found that if it is so dark (so little contrast) that I need AF assist, I'm probably going to be needing flash as well...that or maybe some artistic motion blur.


Drew A. | gear | photosexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sspellman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,731 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan
     
Sep 18, 2007 07:42 |  #3

While the concept is good, Security in the pit at a major venue will generally stop you if they see you have a flash mounted. There will be flashes going off from the audience and they will not really notice the difference. An STE-2 should work fine and be less obvious.

-Scott


ScottSpellmanMedia.com [photography]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tipsy
THREAD ­ STARTER
*hic
Avatar
590 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Cardiff
     
Sep 18, 2007 07:43 |  #4

ive had my flash attatched at major venues before to help balance long lenses, and never had a problem with security so long as i dont fire it.

x


www.racmedia.co.uk (external link)
TV Cameraman and Photographer
EOS 5D + 24-70mm f2.8 are my main weapons of choice.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmb
Senior Member
Avatar
808 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland
     
Sep 18, 2007 08:46 |  #5

Um, if it isn't obvious, there is also the audience to think about.

Also, it is not simply a question of whether one artist will get annoyed if you do this on one gig - it is another way of beign a nuisance (if you can see the assist light on the artist - which you would for it to be effective - it is a nuisance to some extent, yes?), and this will lead to 2 and 1 song rules and so on. Since there almost never is a guy who makes sure the press behaves and is educated about assist lights etc, they'll just thigten the noose for everybody. And I'm sure it is enough to annoy some artists only once and after that it's one song rule for everybody.

This is of course a generalisation. For instance, some punk bands (playing at a small club) / their audience couldn't care less about such things (I'm sure).

Also, since the assist light can be used only in one-shot mode (if I'm not mistaken), isn't it anyways pretty easy to get a focus lock on a static subject when there is enough light to photograph him/her anyway?

As a side note, I've been to a few concerts where it was oblicatory to take the flash off camera before going in (this was at a festival so a number of people actually had flash on their camera for fill light for previously shooting general audience stuff or other bands).


- Kalle
Bjorklid.net (external link) -
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tipsy
THREAD ­ STARTER
*hic
Avatar
590 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Cardiff
     
Sep 18, 2007 09:01 |  #6

You raise some good points Kalle, Anyone got any further comments?

x


www.racmedia.co.uk (external link)
TV Cameraman and Photographer
EOS 5D + 24-70mm f2.8 are my main weapons of choice.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 18, 2007 10:32 |  #7

Agree with Kalle on this one.
I've had images, ehm, turn out different, because someone in the audience used a P&S that projected an AF assist beam. Highly annoying, since it happened all through the show.

Then again, if it's the only way of getting an AF lock... Sometimes you've gotta do what you've gotta do. But then do it only for one song or so. (Also, in that case, light levels will be pretty damn low to start with, so the best idea is probabely to dump the camera and enjoy the gig ;))


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tipsy
THREAD ­ STARTER
*hic
Avatar
590 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Cardiff
     
Sep 18, 2007 11:56 |  #8

I agree rene, ive never used it myself but i thought it would be interesting to discuss the ethics of it as the ethics of flash use have been argued over so many time and this is another if more obscure ethical debate in gig photography.

x


www.racmedia.co.uk (external link)
TV Cameraman and Photographer
EOS 5D + 24-70mm f2.8 are my main weapons of choice.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Valerie ­ S
Member
Avatar
124 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2006
Location: San Francisco/Santa Cruz, CA US
     
Sep 19, 2007 00:35 |  #9

Have you ever been hit in the eyes with them? I have and I think it's annoying. A little bit of fog and it lights up the beams like in a jewel heist movie.


my stuffz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,294 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
AFAssist...
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1371 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.