Anyone use it? If so How well does it work?
ItsMike Goldmember 2,185 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Greenlawn NY More info | Sep 18, 2007 07:24 | #1 |
basroil Cream of the Crop 8,015 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ More info | Sep 18, 2007 09:15 | #2 only a few cameras offer it, and it is mainly useful only in jpg mode. if you where talking about long exposure noise reduction on the other hand, as long as the exposures are kept to under half a battery life long, the it should be fine. I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidwegs Member 224 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Denver, CO More info | Sep 18, 2007 09:18 | #3 On the 40D it works as advertised. Not a perfect solution, but good. In the persuit of total contentment, Canon does not help
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Sep 18, 2007 10:25 | #4 I will not use it on my 40D. Look at what it does to the buffer. From 75 down to 6 shots. High price to pay. Do your noise reduction in the computer. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superdiver Cream of the Crop 9,862 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Ketchikan Alaska More info | Sep 18, 2007 12:13 | #5 If you have it on, could it slow down the frame speed when you are shooting RAW in a regualr M mode? 40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Here is a shot of the moon that I took the other night... This is the one with No pp done to it other than resizing it.. I had the NR CF on ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 28, 2007 04:57 | #7 |
Dockland Member 200 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sweden More info | Sep 28, 2007 05:47 | #8 ItsMike wrote in post #4024075 That was taken at ISO 400, I would say it worked well.. no? I would like to see the same without NR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KeithR Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | Sep 28, 2007 06:12 | #9 ItsMike wrote in post #4024075 That was taken at ISO 400, I would say it worked well.. no? Impossible to say one way or the other, Mike.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcmadkat Goldmember 1,059 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Scotland More info | Sep 28, 2007 08:06 | #10 Still looks as noisy as ISO400 always does. No different to my 30D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2810 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||