Do you guys shoot at ISO200 indoors or something? I have never had the recycle times leave me dry before... ok well... maybe a couple times, but not enough to make me carry an even heavier kit than usual. My back hurts enough as it is...
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Sep 19, 2007 10:21 | #16 Do you guys shoot at ISO200 indoors or something? I have never had the recycle times leave me dry before... ok well... maybe a couple times, but not enough to make me carry an even heavier kit than usual. My back hurts enough as it is... -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sam0329 Senior Member 540 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada More info | Sep 19, 2007 10:52 | #17 picturecrazy wrote in post #3963414 Do you guys shoot at ISO200 indoors or something? I have never had the recycle times leave me dry before... ok well... maybe a couple times, but not enough to make me carry an even heavier kit than usual. My back hurts enough as it is... Agree, extra weight really hurt! The only time I need to change the batteries was one time I was doing a BBQ reception at night, no light just camp fire. I shoot ISO 3200 on dance floor and yes no light on dance floor...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kiwinvan Member 203 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Vancouver, Canada More info | I use a Jackrabbit by Dynalite http://www.bhphotovideo.com …krabbit_Pack_II_with.html leanne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
subtle_spectre Goldmember 1,657 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Sep 19, 2007 11:34 | #19 I use a Quantum Turbo 2x2 powering 2 580Ex's on two bodies. In darkest of halls, there is still a 4 second delay in charging. For outdoor stuff, in bright sun, I now use a Metz 76 mor e often than not.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Sep 19, 2007 12:12 | #20 picturecrazy wrote in post #3963414 Do you guys shoot at ISO200 indoors or something? I have never had the recycle times leave me dry before... ok well... maybe a couple times, but not enough to make me carry an even heavier kit than usual. My back hurts enough as it is... I don't shoot ISO200 but I use flash all day for everything I can. Recycle times have hurt me before and I'd rather add a few ounces to my kit than go through that again... Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiewexler Goldmember 2,032 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Grafton, MA More info | Sep 19, 2007 12:15 | #21 Another happy CP-E3 user here. I flash at 800-1600 when I'm indoors, so the 4AA's in the flash do pretty well, but outdoor fill is another matter alltogether. I can really tell the weddings where I have had to overpower the sun with my flash by my recycle times when I get to the reception. The flash with the CP-E3 is usually still going strong, the flash without it is usually tired. Besides, it's cheap, and powerful. I'd never roll without one! Massachusetts Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Sep 19, 2007 12:21 | #22 I'm seriously considering a CP-E4 to stick under the 1D so I can move the CP-E3 to the 10D...love it that much. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Sep 19, 2007 13:01 | #23 You guys must have pipes of steel to hold that extra weight all day. I guess it also depends on your shooting style. If you like to shoot many frames in succession then the 4AA might leave you dry. -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PadawanDad Senior Member 908 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Melrose, MA More info | CP-E3 all the way. I shot at 1250 - 1600 during receptions, and never miss a heartbeat with this in my pocket. Love it for fill during outdoor formals... no "hold on a second guys while my flash gets ready." Bill Hicks Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiewexler Goldmember 2,032 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Grafton, MA More info | Sep 19, 2007 13:03 | #25 picturecrazy wrote in post #3964439 You guys must have pipes of steel to hold that extra weight all day. I guess it also depends on your shooting style. If you like to shoot many frames in succession then the 4AA might leave you dry. Not sure about my pipes, but my spheres... Massachusetts Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Sep 19, 2007 13:05 | #26 I figure I'm already lugging a heavy 1D, 24-70, 580EX, and bracket. Adding the CP-E3 makes very little difference. I'd put it on my waist but my luck says I get strangled before the formals... Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Sep 19, 2007 13:07 | #27 cdifoto wrote in post #3964464 I figure I'm already lugging a heavy 1D, 24-70, 580EX, and bracket. Adding the CP-E3 makes very little difference. I'd put it on my waist but my luck says I get strangled before the formals... I carry the 1D3, 580, and 24-70 all day and that's bad enough. I think the cp-e3 would be the straw that breaks the camel's back. I didn't even entertain buying a 1D2 because of the weight. When I heard the 1D3 dropped a half pound of weight, it became an option to me. -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Sep 19, 2007 13:09 | #28 picturecrazy wrote in post #3964481 I carry the 1D3, 580, and 24-70 all day and that's bad enough. I think the cp-e3 would be the straw that breaks the camel's back. I didn't even entertain buying a 1D2 because of the weight. When I heard the 1D3 dropped a half pound of weight, it became an option to me. Nah it adds almost nothing perceivable. I have to strip it down to just the 1D and 24-70 before it starts to feel light. And the rare times that happens, it's featherweight! Of course it helps to have the battery pack strapped to the bottom of the rig, so it's balanced evenly. Flash on top and CP-E3 on bottom almost even either other out. Balance is more crucial than mass, imho. Case in point...the "rig" as a 1D and Takumar 50mm feels heavier than the 1D and 24-70 combination because the former is all in my right hand. The latter is in both hands. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Atl-Fotos Member 169 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Atl GA More info | Sep 19, 2007 13:20 | #29 CP-E3 either on my belt or on my strobo-frame. Either way I don't have to worry about my flash keeping up. And I usually shoot at 400iso. Ron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Sep 19, 2007 17:52 | #30 picturecrazy wrote in post #3963414 Do you guys shoot at ISO200 indoors or something? I have never had the recycle times leave me dry before... ok well... maybe a couple times, but not enough to make me carry an even heavier kit than usual. My back hurts enough as it is... Indoors nope, but I use umbrellas which eat power. I just want really fast recharge times. picturecrazy wrote in post #3964439 You guys must have pipes of steel to hold that extra weight all day. I guess it also depends on your shooting style. If you like to shoot many frames in succession then the 4AA might leave you dry. Battery pack goes in my pocket, no extra weight at all. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2284 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||