Hello,
I have just joined this forum and nor had much time to scour through it so it might be a silly question but what lens would you suggest using with a Canon 5 D for wedding photography, thank you in anticipation.
BRISTLES Hatchling 2 posts Joined Sep 2005 More info | Sep 19, 2007 09:17 | #1 Hello,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
notapro Goldmember 2,540 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Southwestern Ontario More info | Sep 19, 2007 09:25 | #2 There's a lot of good information in the FAQ sticky at the top of this forum and I think that includes some discussion of lenses. I'mnot qualified to offer much else, except Welcome to the forum and good luck Amanda
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arch1tect Goldmember 1,541 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: northern nj More info | Sep 19, 2007 09:28 | #3 Besides the FAQ you could also do a search which will yield a lot more results in a less time. Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mR_CaESaR Senior Member 354 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Sep 19, 2007 09:35 | #4 I cannot recommend the 85L on the 5D enough!! Buy the best Lens and never buy again!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | YEP the 85 1.2L rocks on the 5D as does the 35 1.4L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonpink Senior Member 615 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Sep 19, 2007 09:59 | #6 Permanent banAssuming you are seeking one lens, 24-70 or 70-200 depending on needed reach. CP
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Sep 19, 2007 10:29 | #7 canonpink wrote in post #3963265 Assuming you are seeking one lens, 24-70 or 70-200 depending on needed reach. I'd tend to agree; I think the 24-70 would be the better choice of the two in most cases. If you have an external flash as well, the 24-105 IS might be a slightly better one-lens solution, since it has a tad more reach. But this really isn't a situation where you can reasonably expect that one lens will do it all. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Sep 19, 2007 10:38 | #8 I think the 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 IS are much more important lenses to get before wasting money on the uber slow focusing 85L. -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2007 11:42 | #9 Many thanks for everyones input and your welcome's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Sep 19, 2007 11:45 | #10 picturecrazy wrote in post #3963537 I think the 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 IS are much more important lenses to get before wasting money on the uber slow focusing 85L. Please... I have never missed a shot because of slow focus on the 85 and I have the old version. What you gain in IQ far out weighs any perceived slowness in the focusing. This lens just shines on a 5D...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ktgiggle Member 237 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Milpitas, CA More info | Sep 19, 2007 15:17 | #11 airfrogusmc wrote in post #3963934 Please... I have never missed a shot because of slow focus on the 85 and I have the old version. What you gain in IQ far out weighs any perceived slowness in the focusing. This lens just shines on a 5D... But I think 24-70 on 5D is a killer combo, and much more versatile than 85mm Kim Truong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Sep 19, 2007 19:21 | #12 24-105 F4L would be my pick, along with a 50 1.4 for when it's dark. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2200 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||