Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 20 Sep 2007 (Thursday) 22:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can I Shoot In the Rain?

 
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Sep 21, 2007 19:28 as a reply to  @ post 3981096 |  #31

I have always used a pair of supermarket plastic carrier bags, holes poked in the end for the lens, rubber band and lens hood to keep the bag tight around the end of the lens, then tie the handles together to stop it blowing away from the body. Leaves plenty of room for hands to operate everything, keeps the gear dry and costs nothing.

(NOTE: I don't shoot in heavy rain, but typical British showers are no problem and I just keep shooting)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EpHeSuS
Senior Member
280 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Sep 21, 2007 21:43 |  #32

hortonsl62 wrote in post #3981074 (external link)
The setup is "weather resistant" -- bottom line, it isn't waterproof.

Obviously the camera cannot be submerged under water, but the 1 series + a sealed lens are rated for very heavy rain (I can't remember the exact figure, but it was posted here once by Chuck Westfall)

I wouldn't think twice about going out in heavy rain with my 1d2 and 24-105L.


EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Sep 21, 2007 21:46 |  #33

MarKusWeB wrote in post #3980109 (external link)
why spend $40-50 while you can make your own? those products looked nothing special yet very expensive

You can use a garbage bag for under a dime. Some people prefer a more elegant solution, and sometimes you just have to look professional.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aCiD99
Senior Member
Avatar
639 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Nov 2006
Location: LaSalle, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 22, 2007 00:06 |  #34

I've used my 30D & 75-300 IS in absolute downpurs before, just gotta wipe it off every couple minutes and keep going!


1DXII, 3x 1DX, 5DSR, 1DIII, 1DsII, 6D, 7D, 50D, 30D, Rebel XT; 12-24, 14/2.8 fisheye, 20/1.4, 17-40/4L, 24-70/2.8L, 18-50/2.8, 3x 70-200/2.8 IS, 24-105L, 24-70/2.8L, 50/1.8II, 28-135IS, 85/1.2L, 135/1.8, 200/1.8L, 120-300/2.8 OS, 300/2.8L
www.bradgoldring.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krepta
I swear I'm Ken Rockwell!
Avatar
8,482 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
     
Sep 22, 2007 00:36 as a reply to  @ aCiD99's post |  #35

I was at the Rogers Cup in Montreal last year when it began pouring. I quickly stashed away my Rebel XT, but after having left the court where I was watching, I came across a pro (I assumed) who was carrying two set ups: one 1 series (not sure which) mounted on a tripod (carried over his right shoulder) with a white lens attached (likely 70-200), and in his left hand a super-telephoto (not sure which) with another 1 body attached. None of the gear was covered at all. While most people were heading towards the front gate (main building = shelter), he was walking towards the courts nonchalantly and apparently not concerned about the rain and his equipment getting wet. I thought, "Wow, I want something like that... or this guy has money to afford new gear tomorrow!". It kept raining intermittently during the rest of the day, sometimes light, sometimes heavy. I saw 2 or 3 more such photographers with no care for the rain. What they had in common: large cameras with white lenses. Go Canon.

Any of you ever pull something like this? :D


Alex | flickr (external link) | Gear & Feedback | Food! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
novato.larry
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Novato, CA
     
Sep 22, 2007 01:13 |  #36

No I don't


Canon 5D | EF 50 1.8 | EF 24-105 4L :D | EF 35-135 4-5.6 | EF 70-210 4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
novato.larry
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Novato, CA
     
Sep 22, 2007 01:15 |  #37

Planning to buy the Storm Jacket


Canon 5D | EF 50 1.8 | EF 24-105 4L :D | EF 35-135 4-5.6 | EF 70-210 4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Sep 22, 2007 01:21 |  #38

krepta wrote in post #3982886 (external link)
I was at the Rogers Cup in Montreal last year when it began pouring. I quickly stashed away my Rebel XT, but after having left the court where I was watching, I came across a pro (I assumed) who was carrying two set ups: one 1 series (not sure which) mounted on a tripod (carried over his right shoulder) with a white lens attached (likely 70-200), and in his left hand a super-telephoto (not sure which) with another 1 body attached. None of the gear was covered at all. While most people were heading towards the front gate (main building = shelter), he was walking towards the courts nonchalantly and apparently not concerned about the rain and his equipment getting wet. I thought, "Wow, I want something like that... or this guy has money to afford new gear tomorrow!". It kept raining intermittently during the rest of the day, sometimes light, sometimes heavy. I saw 2 or 3 more such photographers with no care for the rain. What they had in common: large cameras with white lenses. Go Canon.

Any of you ever pull something like this? :D

The newspaper likely owns it. I think you mean, err well hope you mean he had a monopod. I've had my 20d with no problems in rain situations. I never had one of them rain jacket things. I prefer shooting in the rain, it makes it more "Interesting".

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krepta
I swear I'm Ken Rockwell!
Avatar
8,482 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
     
Sep 22, 2007 02:20 |  #39

ACDCROCKS wrote in post #3983044 (external link)
The newspaper likely owns it. I think you mean, err well hope you mean he had a monopod. I've had my 20d with no problems in rain situations. I never had one of them rain jacket things. I prefer shooting in the rain, it makes it more "Interesting".

Hmm, yeah, perhaps it was a monopod (more likely), or tripod with the legs folded in. I was paying attention more to his lenses, though. I thought for sure those would get damaged somehow.

Great shots, by the way. No cover, really? They might be more resistant than we think (the cameras, I mean), but I do not dare risk it to find out!


Alex | flickr (external link) | Gear & Feedback | Food! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Ng
Goldmember
Avatar
1,208 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2005
Location: Hartsdale, NY
     
Sep 22, 2007 11:26 |  #40

krepta wrote in post #3983173 (external link)
Hmm, yeah, perhaps it was a monopod (more likely), or tripod with the legs folded in. I was paying attention more to his lenses, though. I thought for sure those would get damaged somehow.

Great shots, by the way. No cover, really? They might be more resistant than we think (the cameras, I mean), but I do not dare risk it to find out!

I've shot in heavy rain twice with my Nikon D200 and 70-200 2.8 .... there are plenty of weather-sealed cameras and lenses on the market. They've been around for decades.

Bill


Billy Ng
1 Body
4 Lenses
3 Strobes
Never enough time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EpHeSuS
Senior Member
280 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Sep 22, 2007 11:54 |  #41

krepta wrote in post #3983173 (external link)
Hmm, yeah, perhaps it was a monopod (more likely), or tripod with the legs folded in. I was paying attention more to his lenses, though. I thought for sure those would get damaged somehow.

Great shots, by the way. No cover, really? They might be more resistant than we think (the cameras, I mean), but I do not dare risk it to find out!

The 1 series and 70-200IS and all Canon super-tele's are all fully weather sealed, meaning a bit of a shower ain't gonna do nothing to them. I left my 1d and 24-105L out in the rain for fun in the backyard for the hell of it. Just took a few shots, put it on the table and went inside :D


EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbernet
send a search party to Mount Hood
19,157 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 22, 2007 12:03 |  #42

Back in April I was shooting in some light drizzle with my 20D. I must have been out in the tulip fields for a good three hours and the camera still works!

I did have a towel with me and I did try the button areas off, but other than that - nothing else...

Since then I have made my own rain-jacket - but I don't use it "too" much (it hasn't rained enough since I made it)

The Canon rep I talked to at this Tulip event said that the 1D series can handle 7" of rain hitting it per hour.... that is a lot!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krepta
I swear I'm Ken Rockwell!
Avatar
8,482 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
     
Sep 22, 2007 14:56 as a reply to  @ timbernet's post |  #43

It is good to hear that the 1 series' weather sealing is that resistant! When I can finally afford one (in 10-15 years?), not just in terms of money but also experience and purpose that justify owning one, I should not have to worry about Mother Nature while I shoot.

Can you imagine the advances on the 1 series in such a period of time? Maybe I will be able to shoot inside a volcano (not really). :rolleyes:


Alex | flickr (external link) | Gear & Feedback | Food! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Denny ­ G
Goldmember
Avatar
1,870 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: On the border - US/Mexico
     
Sep 22, 2007 16:22 as a reply to  @ krepta's post |  #44

I have never read anything from Canon that states any of their equipment is "fully weather sealed". Canon uses terms like "highly resistant to dust and moisture".

Sealed and resistant are NOT the same.

Be careful with what you read on this forum.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trique ­ Daddi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,094 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Feb 2007
Location: East coast of Florida
     
Sep 22, 2007 16:39 |  #45

Another precautionbeside for the camera gear obviously is I wear a poncho big enough to put my camera under if it really begins to pour.Having a secondary line of defense is useful as well.

Trique Daddi


Canon 7DMKII,7D 40D, 20D, CANON 100-400mm IS 4.5/5.6L, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, Kenko Extension Tubes, Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS, 580EX II Flash,Gittos MH 5580 monopod, Thinktank Airport Takeoff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 37 members have posted to it.
Can I Shoot In the Rain?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2810 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.