Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Sep 2007 (Friday) 05:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Going to convert XT to IR soon

 
2005GLI
Goldmember
Avatar
1,857 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 291
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Jersey
     
Sep 21, 2007 05:07 |  #1

Im going to be converting my xt to infrared thru lifepixel hopefull within in the next few weeks. I have some questions regarding it though.

1. which IR do most recommend/use, standard,enhanced, deep/b&w filter?
2. Would you attempt the conversion yourself and save $305 + shipping/insurance?

$95 is alot easier for me to spend then $400+ especially after my last thread about the purchase of the 40d. I am confident i could do it myself by taking my sweet ass time and reading the instructions that will hopefully come with it, and the link i have either on the laptop or at home that show the step by step disassembly of the camera.

so what do you guys think?


|Canon 80D|40D backup|24-105 F4/L|Sigma 70-200 F/2.8|Sigma 150-500 C|
|Tokina 12-24|Sigma 8mm Fisheye|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 21, 2007 12:20 |  #2

Go for it! If you have a problem it probably won't cost you any more to get it fixed than to have the conversion done in the first place.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2005GLI
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,857 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 291
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Jersey
     
Sep 22, 2007 05:01 |  #3

so your saying i should tackle it myself then, huh. it would be nice saving the $400.


|Canon 80D|40D backup|24-105 F4/L|Sigma 70-200 F/2.8|Sigma 150-500 C|
|Tokina 12-24|Sigma 8mm Fisheye|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagicNikon
Senior Member
313 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Sep 22, 2007 07:40 |  #4

I converted my own Nikon D70 with the help of LifePixels instructions. It was easy.


Two Canon 30D's, 70-200mm F/2.8 IS, 17-55mm 2.8 IS, 85mm 1.8, 28mm 1.8, 2 430EX's, ST-E2, 100mm 2.8 macro, 24-105MM F/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2005GLI
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,857 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 291
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Jersey
     
Sep 23, 2007 04:36 |  #5

thanks magic nikon. i'll hopefull or maybe try and order the filer soon.

any recomendations as to which filter to use?


|Canon 80D|40D backup|24-105 F4/L|Sigma 70-200 F/2.8|Sigma 150-500 C|
|Tokina 12-24|Sigma 8mm Fisheye|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagicNikon
Senior Member
313 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Sep 23, 2007 05:52 |  #6

2005GLI wrote in post #3988655 (external link)
thanks magic nikon. i'll hopefull or maybe try and order the filer soon.

any recomendations as to which filter to use?

I used the regular one...its the only one they had at the time.


Two Canon 30D's, 70-200mm F/2.8 IS, 17-55mm 2.8 IS, 85mm 1.8, 28mm 1.8, 2 430EX's, ST-E2, 100mm 2.8 macro, 24-105MM F/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ducko
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: On a pond
     
Oct 03, 2007 08:45 |  #7

I just had my XT converted by lifepixel and got it back yesterday. I love it! I took some test shots and boy am I excited to take it out for a real workout. I was going to do the conversion myself too, but I decided that I didn't have the time to do it and I don't have a clean enough place for it either. I chose the standard IR filter, but I just saw some pictures with one of the other ones and I think I like the other one better. Here is a link to a thread where someone was selling their converted camera and had some examples shots: https://photography-on-the.net …384066&highligh​t=infrared

Here are some test shots that I took with my newly converted XT:

IMAGE: http://ducko.smugmug.com/photos/203573455-L.jpg
IMAGE: http://ducko.smugmug.com/photos/203573658-L.jpg
IMAGE: http://ducko.smugmug.com/photos/203573555-L.jpg

--Ducko

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeMcL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
     
Oct 03, 2007 08:50 |  #8

Wow! I didn't realize that 3/4 the cost of that conversion is labor. At that price, it would surely be worth taking a shot at.

IR is awesome, and I would definitely suggest the DIY if you have the space to spread out and take your time.


350d, 5d, 28-70L, 70-200L, 430EX,
50 1.8, 85 1.8 - full alienbees studio set.

MikeMcLane.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ducko
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: On a pond
     
Oct 03, 2007 08:55 |  #9

It cost me $360 to get mine done, including shipping. Just FYI.


--Ducko

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poindexter
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 270
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Vermont
     
Oct 03, 2007 09:18 |  #10

A little post processing will yield the same results as the photos in the IR 10D for sale thread ;)


flickr (external link) | SmugMug (external link) | Gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ducko
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: On a pond
     
Oct 03, 2007 09:27 |  #11

Oh really? I guess I need to take some photoshop classes. It would also probably help to have a version of photoshop that is newer than 5. Thanks for the tip!


--Ducko

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagicNikon
Senior Member
313 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Oct 03, 2007 15:42 |  #12

Poindexter wrote in post #4055806 (external link)
A little post processing will yield the same results as the photos in the IR 10D for sale thread ;)

I sure wouldn't say that you can get the 'same' results. You may be able to cheat a little and approximate the look of an IR shot, but there's just something special about a true near-IR photo.


Two Canon 30D's, 70-200mm F/2.8 IS, 17-55mm 2.8 IS, 85mm 1.8, 28mm 1.8, 2 430EX's, ST-E2, 100mm 2.8 macro, 24-105MM F/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dylanlewis2000
Senior Member
444 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Swansea
     
Oct 03, 2007 16:51 as a reply to  @ MagicNikon's post |  #13

Can you only shoot infrared if you have your camera converted? Where do you get the kit?


Canon 400D, Canon 17-85 IS USM, Canon 50mm f/1.8, Sigma 100-300 F/4 DG EX, Sigma 150mm F2.8 MACRO EX, Jessops Extention Tubes, Jessops X2 Tele.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poindexter
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 270
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Vermont
     
Oct 03, 2007 20:39 |  #14

MagicNikon wrote in post #4057917 (external link)
I sure wouldn't say that you can get the 'same' results. You may be able to cheat a little and approximate the look of an IR shot, but there's just something special about a true near-IR photo.

You're misreading my post. I'm talking about Post Processing a true IR photo. I was saying that he could post process his IR shot to get the same look as the IR photos in the other thread. Maybe my post wasn't specific enough ;)

And yes, you are correct. You can simulate an IR-effect in Photoshop, but it will never be as good as straight off an IR camera.


flickr (external link) | SmugMug (external link) | Gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagicNikon
Senior Member
313 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Oct 03, 2007 20:41 |  #15

Poindexter wrote in post #4059464 (external link)
You're misreading my post. I'm talking about Post Processing a true IR photo. I was saying that he could post process his IR shot to get the same look as the IR photos in the other thread. Maybe my post wasn't specific enough ;)

And yes, you are correct. You can simulate an IR-effect in Photoshop, but it will never be as good as straight off an IR camera.


Gotcha! I see what you mean now :oops:.


Two Canon 30D's, 70-200mm F/2.8 IS, 17-55mm 2.8 IS, 85mm 1.8, 28mm 1.8, 2 430EX's, ST-E2, 100mm 2.8 macro, 24-105MM F/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,321 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Going to convert XT to IR soon
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1074 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.