Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Sep 2007 (Friday) 11:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How come no DOF info on view finder??

 
bbbig
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 21, 2007 11:18 |  #1

I must be missing something... why is it that Canon (don't think Nikons either) doesn't display DOF field depth calculation on the view finder? It would be GREAT to be able to see what the resulting DOF (both front of and behind the subject focus) as you compose the shot.

Since the camera has ALL the information, focal length, subject distance, and aperture, this should be a relatively a no-brainer to implement. The DOF Preview button is pretty useless for smaller aperture settings!

This would completely eliminate any guesswork around how much DOF you will end up with in the resulting shot. Is there some patent issue I'm not aware of??? Or am I the first to think of this??


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 21, 2007 11:22 |  #2

That would be a great addition I think.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Sep 21, 2007 11:27 |  #3

I suspect that like all things "computer" what sounds easy would be very hard to implement economically.

What I reallly miss is that my old EOS 650 circa 1987 had a 'control' settings where you wished to ensure DoF subjects in focus ~ you viewed the nearest object and half pressed the shutter, then recomposed to get the furthest object and press again, then recomposed to get the mid 'zone' and took the shot - the camera selected the aperture and consequent shutter speed to "do it".

The current A-Dep mode which I have never used sadly does not do the same thing AFAIK.


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbbig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 21, 2007 12:21 |  #4

Box Brownie wrote in post #3978293 (external link)
I suspect that like all things "computer" what sounds easy would be very hard to implement economically.

Nah, I am a programmer myself and it wouldn't take more than 10 lines of code to do this...

DOF formula (external link)


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Sep 21, 2007 12:38 |  #5

But DOF depends on more than the aperature you are using. Sounds like it would be a complicated calculation. And how would the info be displayed to you? I doubt telling most people distances would help much. I like the DOF preview button myself.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Sep 21, 2007 12:40 |  #6

that would be a cool feature, to be able to see what your DOF is based on the focal point and aperature selected....I would think it wouldnt be hard to program into the camera...


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Sep 21, 2007 12:49 |  #7

bbbig wrote in post #3978630 (external link)
Nah, I am a programmer myself and it wouldn't take more than 10 lines of code to do this...

DOF formula (external link)

I bow to your experience as a programmer but as I see it the modern dSLR is comprised of fixed programming in the various onboard ic's and the variable stored programming in the firmware and though it may only take 10 lines of code the fixed (hardwired) programming may not be able to be so integrated with the changes in the firmware.

On the face of it there is more computing power in the dSLR than was on the early Apollo missions (probably an incorrect statement but just to get my 'idea' across) and even that had problems even with all the error trapping they used by having 5 'voting' computers.

:)


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbbig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:00 |  #8

gasrocks wrote in post #3978726 (external link)
But DOF depends on more than the aperature you are using. Sounds like it would be a complicated calculation. And how would the info be displayed to you? I doubt telling most people distances would help much. I like the DOF preview button myself.

The display would be something like:

[Inches or feet front of the subject] / [Inches or feet behind the subject]

indicating everything in between will be in focus. See my previous post and hyperlink - the formula isn't all that complex, and yes you do need more than the aperture info, however all that information is available to the camera when it's shot.


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
qtaran111
Senior Member
Avatar
530 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: London
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:00 as a reply to  @ Box Brownie's post |  #9

DoF also depends on the distance from the subject to the camera, so closer you get, shallower DoF; further away, deeper DoF.

How will the (dslr) camera know how close it is to the subject?

Also, isn't what you are suggesting a variation on hyperfocal distance? (i.e. it's what those markings on your lens barrel are for)


Camden Photographic (external link) | Smugmug (external link)[COLOR=black] | CompuTrekker AW Review (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbbig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:05 |  #10

qtaran111 wrote in post #3978882 (external link)
How will the (dslr) camera know how close it is to the subject?

The camera would know how far the subject is, by getting the focus information from lens.


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:06 |  #11

qtaran111 wrote in post #3978882 (external link)
DoF also depends on the distance from the subject to the camera, so closer you get, shallower DoF; further away, deeper DoF.

How will the (dslr) camera know how close it is to the subject?

From the focus information, perhaps?

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:09 |  #12

This presupposes that the distance is actually being measured by the lens and can be transmitted to the camera processor.

Somewhere I saw a Canon lens list that showed which lens could transmit the distance info for use with the ETTL-II flashguns and it was very few of them!!! Distance being very important when doing flash exposures.


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:16 |  #13

I have set up the DOF calculations in a spreadsheet, and there are just three equations (plus some simple unit conversions) and they aren't particularly difficult. The only "trick" in a spreadsheet is to use the "IF" operator to recognize and display Infinity (when Hyperfocal Distance is less than the Focus Distance).

http://www.dofmaster.c​om/equations.html (external link)

For anyone doing macro or landscape work, this would be more useful than Auto Focus.

The first manufacturer to add this feature (provided it works) may well have me as a customer.

EDIT: I have seen so many threads on this forum where the OP's real problem was DOF, not focusing. Most of them don't have an inkling about DOF (and it takes twenty inklings to make a clue ;)). These people could benefit from DOF display - if they could understand it.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:22 |  #14

I'd kill to have this feature.

You can upload a jar file to your (compatible) phone that will do it. You take your phone with you everywhere right?


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
qtaran111
Senior Member
Avatar
530 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: London
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:46 |  #15

bbbig wrote in post #3978913 (external link)
The camera would know how far the subject is, by getting the focus information from lens.

number six wrote in post #3978921 (external link)
From the focus information, perhaps?

How? The camera only knows/records the focal length not distance to subject.


Camden Photographic (external link) | Smugmug (external link)[COLOR=black] | CompuTrekker AW Review (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,163 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
How come no DOF info on view finder??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2728 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.