Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Sep 2007 (Friday) 13:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1D Mk.III C.Fn III-2 Misconceptions

 
wilvoeka
Senior Member
599 posts
Likes: 43
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 21, 2007 13:49 |  #1

There seems to be a misconception among some users about Custum Function III-2. I have seen it a few times here and I have been seeing alot in other forums.

So I thought I would post this to try and address the misconception. Also NOTE that I am not drawing any relationships between this and the Focus issues some are having with the camera.

C.Fn III-2 is used to set the AI tracking sensitivity and the set up for the function seems to be causing some confusion.

When you set this CF up you have Slow, Moderatley slow, 0 or normal, Moderatley fast and fast.

Some people believe that if they are shooting Fast moving subjects that this should be set to fast.

NOT TRUE.

This CF determines how fast the focus will change to a differant subject or focal point if something enters the view in front of or behind the subject.

So if you are tracking a Bird and have the CF set to fast the moment something passes in front of the bird or you move the focusing point of the subject the camera will refocus on the new object in the focal point.

If you want the camera to ignore things blocking you target while tracking it is better to set this CF to SLOW.

Fast would be used if you are wanting to use AI Servo to shoot mulitple subjects and what the camera to refocus everytime you move the Focal point to a new subject.

Here is a quite directly from the Canon Professional Network.

The heightened sensitivity of the EOS-1D Mark III AF system can, in some situations, cause the autofocus to appear erratic. In fact, it is not erratic at all, simply it is so sensitive that it will identify and re-focus on a new subject much faster than previous cameras – and crucially – much faster than you might expect.
Turning down this response rate to ‘Moderately Slow’ or ‘Slow’ will help when tracking subjects as the camera will not jump instantly to any new ‘subject’ or the background and should ensure a more familiar AF response. Note that this will not slow down the speed of the autofocus, only the speed at which the camera recognises a new subject. It’s like a buffer than provides you with more time and leeway to track a subject without the camera constantly finding new ones.


Hopefully this will help dispell the misconception, and help some people that may have set this Cf incorrectly and have been having problems.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Sep 21, 2007 14:21 |  #2

But if you have it set on Slow following a BIF then lose it (so focus lock on something else ) you dont have a chance of getting back onto it .as its to slow
IF set to fast you do have a chance as long as you can pick the BIF up again as you can reaquire focus on FAST but not on SLOW
Not looking to argue here but just the way i see it and have tested this too
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bgmoore
Member
99 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Sep 21, 2007 14:45 |  #3

GyRob wrote in post #3979371 (external link)
But if you have it set on Slow following a BIF then lose it (so focus lock on something else ) you dont have a chance of getting back onto it .as its to slow
IF set to fast you do have a chance as long as you can pick the BIF up again as you can reaquire focus on FAST but not on SLOW
Not looking to argue here but just the way i see it and have tested this too
Rob.

I've been shooting BIF on slow with pretty good results since firmware 1.10. When you lose focus you pump the focus button again. Like wilvoeka said, there is no difference in the speed the camera acqiures focus when you push the button. On the fast setting I just don't have the physical capability to hold it on a bird unless it's filling the whole frame. This is a change in technique from my 1D2.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Sep 21, 2007 15:07 |  #4

GyRob wrote in post #3979371 (external link)
But if you have it set on Slow following a BIF then lose it (so focus lock on something else ) you dont have a chance of getting back onto it .as its to slow
IF set to fast you do have a chance as long as you can pick the BIF up again as you can reaquire focus on FAST but not on SLOW
Not looking to argue here but just the way i see it and have tested this too
Rob.

And by the same token, you can just as quickly lose focus, too. It's all about compromises and what you're willing to live with.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickR
Senior Member
Avatar
741 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 180
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
     
Sep 21, 2007 15:11 |  #5

bgmoore wrote in post #3979559 (external link)
I've been shooting BIF on slow with pretty good results since firmware 1.10. When you lose focus you pump the focus button again. Like wilvoeka said, there is no difference in the speed the camera acqiures focus when you push the button. On the fast setting I just don't have the physical capability to hold it on a bird unless it's filling the whole frame. This is a change in technique from my 1D2.

What worries me with setting to SLOW if you don't pump the AF and you slightly loose track of the BIF or subject you have to rely on the MKIII's predictive focus mechanism to work out where the BIF is, so if the BIF accelerates when loosing track of the BIF the camera will fire and BIF will be OOF. Maybe because you pump the AF that is why you are having success with BIF type shots at LOW setting?

Can't remember who told me but a Canon guy said "the high sensitivity setting will overide the predictive focus" which he did not recommend. I tried this setting with success at a Motorcycle Race meeting last weekend, I also have had success with the MID setting.

Can the MKIII Predictive Focus Mechanism work out where an accelerating object will be. Anyone know the answer?Cheers


Nick, UK
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Sep 21, 2007 15:30 |  #6

PacAce wrote in post #3979742 (external link)
And by the same token, you can just as quickly lose focus, too. It's all about compromises and what you're willing to live with.

Yes i do except that but surly thats were the skill of the photographer will come into it by making sure he/she keeps the focus point on the bird/subject -or if its lost quickly getting back onto it .

on FAST he/she has a chance on SLOW they dont.
this is more for the faster flying birds dove/pidion/duck's.
For Herons / Egrett's Swans slow could be used with sucess as well but i would still stay on fast.
Rob


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickR
Senior Member
Avatar
741 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 180
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
     
Sep 22, 2007 05:19 |  #7

GyRob wrote in post #3979915 (external link)
Yes i do except that but surly thats were the skill of the photographer will come into it by making sure he/she keeps the focus point on the bird/subject -or if its lost quickly getting back onto it .

on FAST he/she has a chance on SLOW they dont.
this is more for the faster flying birds dove/pidion/duck's.
For Herons / Egrett's Swans slow could be used with sucess as well but i would still stay on fast.
Rob

Rob, I agree with you on this one, not that I am that skilled nailing the focus point on the subject especially the eye of a bird;)

Cheers


Nick, UK
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Sep 22, 2007 05:50 |  #8

Why don't people try all the variations and then set to what suits you in the situation you are shooting in?

If you have tried, then people post there findings and see if you all find common ground


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Sep 22, 2007 07:24 |  #9

MaDProFF wrote in post #3983520 (external link)
Why don't people try all the variations and then set to what suits you in the situation you are shooting in?

If you have tried, then people post there findings and see if you all find common ground

Most of the settings i use are indeed from what others who got the MK3 early have tried and found to be OK .
the problem is we all shoot diffrent subjects so my setting's for birds may not suit someone who shoots sport.
And even then some find a setting works well for them but other's maybe dont like the way it makes the camera react .
For me i want it to not only work as fast as poiseble but have it feel that way too - but im sure others would find My settings make the camera to lively and almost jerky/ twitchy .
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,847 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
1D Mk.III C.Fn III-2 Misconceptions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2728 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.