Mine is scratched. I wish I wasted my money before it got scrached.
Could you tell us how you scratched yours? It would be very interesting to know.
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 23, 2007 11:01 | #16 ryant35 wrote in post #3990004 Mine is scratched. I wish I wasted my money before it got scrached. Could you tell us how you scratched yours? It would be very interesting to know. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sandpiper Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 23, 2007 12:00 | #17 ryant35 wrote in post #3990004 Mine is scratched. I wish I wasted my money before it got scrached. Yes, but you haven't scratched the LCD merely the plastic protector that is over it. A new one costs little different to the protector that you would have bought in the first place. Just buy a new one and replace it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 23, 2007 15:17 | #18 sandpiper wrote in post #3990344 Yes, but you haven't scratched the LCD merely the plastic protector that is over it. A new one costs little different to the protector that you would have bought in the first place. Just buy a new one and replace it. These cameras are already fitted with a cheap plastic protector for the LCD, if you buy another one it is simply protecting this cheap plastic protector, not the expensive LCD underneath. The Canon one can be scratched but it is extremely difficult to do and very few people will actually need to replace it. So you are more likely to be wasting money buying a protector for the protector, as it is unlikely you will need it. If you do actually scratch your unprotected protector and replace it, you will be 5 or 6 bucks down on the deal - hardly a big risk. My cameras lead a hard life, frequently getting bangs and knocks as I shoot with multiple bodies and they are constantly banging against each other as I move around, including the LCD, and I have yet to mark any of them. These (Canon standard) LCD protectors are very tough. I google searched canon 20d lcd cover and found a post were someone used a suction cup to remove the cover to replace it. It looks like I have some dust under the cover, I wonder if I could remove it to clean under it and put it back on with out replacing it just yet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sandpiper Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 23, 2007 15:31 | #19 ryant35 wrote in post #3991229 I google searched canon 20d lcd cover and found a post were someone used a suction cup to remove the cover to replace it. It looks like I have some dust under the cover, I wonder if I could remove it to clean under it and put it back on with out replacing it just yet. In theory, I would think so. The suction cup is the standard way of removing the old protector in order to fit the new one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Sep 23, 2007 18:28 | #20 SkipD wrote in post #3989952 Folks, it really is difficult (unless you truly TRY) to scratch Canon's LCD protectors. They are really tough. You don't need to waste your money on any "protector" for the protector issued with your camera. There will always be those that wear a belt and two pairs of suspenders for fear of losing their pants. When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
versedmb Goldmember 4,448 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2006 More info | Sep 23, 2007 20:14 | #21 SkipD wrote in post #3989952 Folks, it really is difficult (unless you truly TRY) to scratch Canon's LCD protectors. They are really tough. You don't need to waste your money on any "protector" for the protector issued with your camera. I'm pretty careful with my gear and I managed to put several small scratches in my LCD cover (XT). Its only bothersome in certain lighting, but I will likely purchase one of those cheap stick-on LCD protectors when I replace my XT. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dfindr Senior Member 676 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Gilbert, Arizona More info | Sep 24, 2007 00:46 | #22 krepta wrote in post #3988189 http://www.shieldzone.com …escription/CNNEOS30D.html I have one each for my Rebel XT and 40D. It is expensive for an applicable LCD shield, but it functions just as claimed. I like the lifetime guarantee, too. i agree here, absolutely worth the extra money. It is indestructable. i bought one for my iPhone, nono and 80gig video. Outstanding product however not easy to apply if you have shakey hands. DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 24, 2007 06:12 | #23 versedmb wrote in post #3992905 I'm pretty careful with my gear and I managed to put several small scratches in my LCD cover (XT). Its only bothersome in certain lighting, but I will likely purchase one of those cheap stick-on LCD protectors when I replace my XT. There's a good chance that what you see are not scratches, but deposits of some material that got wiped on to the LCD cover. Chances are that you can remove the offending material easily with a polish designed for automobile clear-coat finishes. Wal-Mart has such polishes near the touch-up paint in the auto accessories area. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeBell Goldmember 2,977 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Perth, Scotland More info | I've managed to get two deep scratches on my 5D LCD cover. Canon EOS 5DS R • EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM • EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM • EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM • EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM • EF 28mm f/1.8 USM • EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM • EF 85mm f/1.8 USM • EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM • TS-E 17mm f/4L • TS-E 45mm f/2.8 • TS-E 24.0mm f/3.5 L II • EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vincewchan Senior Member 614 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: SoCal, USA More info | Oct 28, 2007 16:08 | #25 I would recommend the "daproducts" protectors. They make them in different sizes for any camera. You can also customize what size you want as well. I've bought this for every camera I've owned. 5D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 28, 2007 16:57 | #26 See here for where the cure was worse than the supposed worry. The cracked add-on screen protector damaged Canon's when he tried to remove it. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Oct 28, 2007 18:54 | #27 And I have seen where people that use hoodman protectors have rub marks all around the lcd itself and over time, acts like sandpaper and grinds the body down. The only protector should be a static PDA-like protector where it is is applied to the LCD cover. Of course, you could just order spare top and back cover from Canon for around $20-25 and just store them. That is what I have stashed away, after I had to replace the top lcd of a 20D, and decided to order the 30D parts as well to make use of the shipping fee. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 28, 2007 19:31 | #28 The PDA screen protectors are flimsy enough that anything able to scratch the Canon screen cover would go right through them. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 28, 2007 20:02 | #29 It turns out that what I though were scratches ended up to be just some dust under the sensor cover. I followed some instructions I found only for removing the back of by 20D to remove the UV filter, and took out 6-8 screws and opened the back of the camera, and used a sensor swab & cleaner to wipe of the LCD & then the back of the cover. Good as new, and it only took 10 minutes. Less next time now that I know what I am doing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
midget Senior Member 511 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: NY More info | Oct 28, 2007 20:21 | #30 i personally dont find it necessary to cover it. when i got a touch-screen phone (moto e6) i was set on getting a screen protector for it for it certainly sees a lot of use, but alas i got lazy, and the screen is fine to this day. perhaps it depends on how you use the equipment (i.e. if you're rough with your equipment, etc). 40d + 50mm f1.8 MK I + my feet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2924 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||