Each camera has their purpose and these high end pro-bodies are meant for one thing and it's kind of obvious... for pros... You cannot associate a cell phone with a camera because, as someone put it, it's a gadget that's not really a necessity in a business environment. Sure, it would be nice to have features like that, but you can do the same general functions as a free cell phone.
Many tech components and gadgets have an explosive and short lived life span now days. You see a new graphics card chip generation every 18 months with refreshed lines almost every 6-8 months. In the first 3 months, high end graphic cards could be in the $1000 range, then another 3 months later, the price drops by half. It's just a nature of things when you deal with bleeding-edge technology that's more in tune with a fad or culture following. Camera's aren't like this. They are built for a specific use and are business centered, more like a tool than a gadget.
It's a bit hard to compare pro level bodies and equipment, because of the fact that they don't depreciated quickly. As that's being said, afford what you can and don't look back. If the price drop, oh wells. This is what we would call classic buyer's regret. Companies spend millions and millions of dollars in service, ads and awareness programs towards the new consumer to reassure them that they made the right choice. It's easier and costs less to help retain your current customer base than it is to get new one's.
Also, when word of the new 1Ds MkIII's were released, may people believed the price would have been between 9-10k. $1000 more for all of the new features seems like a good deal, but I would reserve judgment till actual reviews are out.