Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Sep 2007 (Monday) 22:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is my 20D front focusing?

 
hoogerhs
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 24, 2007 22:22 |  #1

Looking for opinions, I'm 99% sure my 20D is front focusing. I've tried a number of tests with similar results. The attached photo was with the 100mm macro at f/2.8 in daylight. The full sized image on this and other photos clearly show the top of the 'F' in the word focus being OOF. Is my 20D front focusing?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 24, 2007 22:26 |  #2

Something's front focusing a little. Focusing is controlled by the lens, cameras can be tweaked a little I think. Try another lens and see what it does.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoogerhs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 24, 2007 22:37 |  #3

I suppose it's worth noting then, I had similar results with different lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackProton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,348 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 24, 2007 22:53 |  #4

That doesn't actually look too bad to me. When my XT was front-focusing, the FOCUS-HERE line was completely blurred out and unreadable. If you consider the very, very narrow DOF involved here, that the lens might be focusing on the very front edge of the FOCUS-HERE line and that the chart appears to be slightly off-centered, it looks pretty good to me.

If you're still unsure, try shooting some text, book spines, newspaper, etc. at roughly 20 feet and see what results you get. If that's in focus, I don't think you have much to worry about.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yohan ­ Pamudji
Goldmember
Avatar
2,994 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Mississippi
     
Sep 25, 2007 09:47 |  #5

It doesn't look terrible, but noticeable. If you see similar results with your other lenses it's definitely the camera. If you send in the camera with a few test shots done with different lenses showing the same amount of front-focus, and tell them to adjust the focus just slightly to the back, they should be able to do that for you. It's a good idea to get the camera properly calibrated, because if you ever get a new lens that is also slightly front-focusing, the aggregate front-focus of the body + lens will cause the final focus to be more significantly out of focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoogerhs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 11:57 as a reply to  @ Yohan Pamudji's post |  #6

I've tried two different lenses so far with differing results.

100mm Macro at f/2.8 as pictured.
24-105 @105mm f/4 - With that lens it looked as though it was focusing at around 6mm.

Admittedly the tests I tried were a little haphazard/rushed at the time, so they could be slightly off. I guess I need to try out a few additional tests to be certain.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VladDracule
Senior Member
648 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 12:58 |  #7

where do you get the chart for this test?


Canon 40D, 70-200 f/4L, 28-135 IS, 50 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rob.B
Member
43 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Derby, UK
     
Sep 25, 2007 13:03 |  #8

I think tis is about right for a 20D, I had mind pro checked at an expo' last year and it too had a front bias, but I was told this was the norm for a 20D.


Rob.B
(Canon 20D, 40D, Sigma 18-35 EX, 80-400 EX OS, Tamron 28-300 DiII)

www.rtb2photographic.c​o.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoogerhs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 14:21 |  #9

VladDracule wrote in post #4004741 (external link)
where do you get the chart for this test?



If you do a google search for focusing chart, it will be the first link.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackProton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,348 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 14:23 |  #10

hoogerhs wrote in post #4004303 (external link)
I've tried two different lenses so far with differing results.

100mm Macro at f/2.8 as pictured.
24-105 @105mm f/4 - With that lens it looked as though it was focusing at around 6mm.

It might be the 24-105 lens then. Do you have something like the 50mm f1.8 you can also test? Also try a few longer distance tests.

Well, worse case scenerio is that you send in the camera and the 24-105 and let Canon sort it out. From experience, they seem to do a better job with a front-focusing issue when they get camera and lens anyway.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 25, 2007 14:35 |  #11

tim wrote in post #4000921 (external link)
Focusing is controlled by the lens, cameras can be tweaked a little I think. ...

Front/back focusing I believe is a difference between the light path to the sensor and the focus screen. If the light path is of different lengths then the image will not be what you see in the viewfinder.

VladDracule wrote in post #4004741 (external link)
where do you get the chart for this test?

http://focustestchart.​com/chart.html (external link)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackProton
Goldmember
Avatar
2,348 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 14:43 |  #12

gjl711 wrote in post #4005304 (external link)
Front/back focusing I believe is a difference between the light path to the sensor and the focus screen. If the light path is of different lengths then the image will not be what you see in the viewfinder.

I assumed we were talking about auto-focus. An incorrect viewfinder offset would only affect manual focusing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoogerhs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 14:53 as a reply to  @ JackProton's post |  #13

In my case, it is autofocus.

Considering my 20D and lenses are long since out of warranty... anyone have ballpark figures for what canon charges for this kind of service?

Thanks
-Steve




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hoogerhs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Sep 25, 2007 14:58 |  #14

JackProton wrote in post #4005239 (external link)
It might be the 24-105 lens then. Do you have something like the 50mm f1.8 you can also test? Also try a few longer distance tests.

Well, worse case scenerio is that you send in the camera and the 24-105 and let Canon sort it out. From experience, they seem to do a better job with a front-focusing issue when they get camera and lens anyway.

I do have access to a 50mm f1.8 I can try, I also have access to a Rebel XT (300D) which could help me narrow it down to a lenses versus body.
Looks like I will have to perform a few different tests here to narrow down whether I actually have a problem or not and whether or not it is my lens or camera body (or both).

Thanks for all the feedback so far.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 25, 2007 15:16 |  #15

JackProton wrote in post #4005364 (external link)
I assumed we were talking about auto-focus. An incorrect viewfinder offset would only affect manual focusing.

Sorry, I didn't mean to say viewfinder. The light falling on the sensor does not take the same path as the light you falling on the focus sensor. The focus sensor gets it’s light bounced off of the secondary mirror, the image sensor get the full, un-bounced light from the lens. If the mirror and sensor are a little out of alignment and one path is longer or shorter, then the camera will think it is in focus when in reality it is not. Page 21 of the 40D white paper has a nice cut away and you can see the various light paths.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,487 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Is my 20D front focusing?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1843 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.