Couple of things I want to point out, having worked in optics for 5 years and being a DO (Dispensing Optician, properly qualified to know what I'm talking about lol).
Firstly, progressive lenses shouldn't be a problem when taking photo's, however as most people here have said, lifting the glasses is generally better.
In regards to computer use and progressives, yes the hourglass idea is ROUGHLY true, but not as true as you may think. Varifocal lenses have what is known as Surface Aberation Astigmatism, which basically means that if you shift off centre you arrive in distortion. Depending on the design of the lens depends on how that distortion presents itself. If you wear soft lenses, the distortion gradually edges in but is more tolerable. If you wear hard lenses, the area of distortion is the same but instead of a smooth transition from clarity to fuzz it's like a line is drawn at one point, one side clear the other fuzz.
Also, depending on lens manufacturer and model, you can have lenses with much much wider intermeidiate (computer) sections. From personal experience, I would suggest Essilor Physio lenses or possibly the American Optical (AO) Pro Easy. For optimal computer use do not go for to shallow a frame, as the design of lenses that will be required will affect your intermediate vision.
Finally on this subject, make sure you clarify with your Optometrist what distance your computer screen is set at . . . it can affect what they prescribe you, or they may tell you that you are too close/far to get optimal vision.
Oh and Gasrocks: Glass as opposed to plastic would make no difference in how well they could see, they both have the same Abbe value (light dispersion and therefore chromatic abberation). It will be the change from progressives to BiFocals that has made the differnce!
Sorry to be a bore guys, I deal with this stuff all day long!!!
Tom