NickR,
I'm not really quite sure what you mean, I'm probably being dumb its just been a long day lol!
Tom
tsfall Member 125 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Rayleigh, Essex, UK More info | Sep 27, 2007 13:28 | #46 NickR, Canon 40D [Gripped]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_C Goldmember 4,042 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK) More info | Sep 27, 2007 13:29 | #47 Poor Tom, first a Nick_C giving his brains a workout, now a NickR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NickR Senior Member More info | Sep 27, 2007 13:38 | #48 tsfall wrote in post #4019683 NickR, I'm not really quite sure what you mean, I'm probably being dumb its just been a long day lol! Tom You have been hard at it Nick, UK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Sep 27, 2007 13:38 | #49 number six wrote in post #4008214 Geez. I guess I'm the only one left using ordinary bifocals. I'm one up on you; I gave up on bi/tri-focals and the others, and use single vision specs. Fortunately after cataract surgery (both eyes) my non-corrected vision is right on at arm's length which just happens to be monitor distance). I use the specs for distance, and struggle a bit with reading unless the lighting is good (bright light gives me a smaller aperture to improve my DOF When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsfall Member 125 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Rayleigh, Essex, UK More info | Sep 27, 2007 13:58 | #50 Ah, I get you now Nick!! Those shouldn't be a problem, but may need a slight bit of adjustment to get optimal vision. The only problem I can envisage is that there isn't going to be much of a back vertex distance (distance from back of lens to front of eye) to accomodate varifocals. I think you are going to need a true compact varifocal such as the Sola Compact Ultra or Essilor Ellipse. Canon 40D [Gripped]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_C Goldmember 4,042 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK) More info | Sep 27, 2007 14:03 | #51 I find my vision is quite a bit sharper if I lift my glasses up off my nose by about 5mm, not exactly a comfy position, but it seems I might not be viewing through the optimum part of the lens, I asked the opticians at the time (specsavers) & they had no real answer, I remember them saying they have never heard of this before, this was years ago mind you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsfall Member 125 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Rayleigh, Essex, UK More info | Sep 27, 2007 14:52 | #52 Hah, Nick they were telling you a load of old cobblers. What they have done is marked the glasses up incorrectly, I almost guarantee it. Canon 40D [Gripped]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_C Goldmember 4,042 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK) More info | Sep 27, 2007 14:57 | #53 tsfall wrote in post #4020286 Hah, Nick they were telling you a load of old cobblers. What they have done is marked the glasses up incorrectly, I almost guarantee it. Varifocals are fitted after taking a measurement of where the pupil sits in relation to the bottom of the frame. If they are made up with this measurement too low, your vision is not corrected enough, too high and it's over corrected. In this case they have set the heights (as the measurement is called) too low in the frame. This is a common occurence and they should have checked this and remade your glasses. However, that is a problem with using a franchised optician, if they think they can save money they will!! Tom Right ok, well I wont let this happen again, armed with a little more knowledge than what I had back then should see that I get a better set this time for sure
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsfall Member 125 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Rayleigh, Essex, UK More info | Sep 27, 2007 14:58 | #54 Sounds good Nick, where abouts in Grays is your property?? I may well know it or even live next door to it!! Canon 40D [Gripped]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_C Goldmember 4,042 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK) More info | Sep 27, 2007 14:59 | #55 Its in College Road.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsfall Member 125 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Rayleigh, Essex, UK More info | Sep 27, 2007 15:05 | #56 Know it well, drive by it every day on my way to work Canon 40D [Gripped]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_C Goldmember 4,042 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK) More info | Sep 27, 2007 15:06 | #57 tsfall wrote in post #4020367 Know it well, drive by it every day on my way to work Next time your in the area, come and see me at Lakeside, I'll sort your glasses out for you ![]() Small world!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Papaw Senior Member 765 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: North Central Texas More info | Oct 02, 2007 20:30 | #58 I just received my 85L 1.2 and for the first time it looks like I will have to learn to manual focus - if I intend on using the 1.2 in low light. I guess I will be rereading this thread as I can't figure the best way to combine my glasses (bifocal), the diopler, while manually adjusting. 1D MKIIN 30D 20D and G6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2636 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||