Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Sep 2007 (Tuesday) 15:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dumb question: Which ISO do you normally shoot at?

 
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Sep 26, 2007 12:10 |  #31

bbbig wrote in post #4010663 (external link)
Hey thanks for that link.

Very interesting about those 160,320,640,1250 ISO settings... Do you see that resulting histogram at those settings are always "spiked"? In other words, unless you shoot at ISO 100/200/400/800/1600, it may result in inaccurate distribution of colors, even though the signal to noise ratio may be better at 160/320/640/1250. Any thoughts?

Do you have the image of these results? If not, I can e-mail it to you.

I also did the test myself, and confirmed the same values for my 30D, using the IRIS program. It's quite simple. Let me know if you want more info.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raymate
Goldmember
1,736 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto. CA - Bedford. UK
     
Sep 26, 2007 15:13 |  #32

During the summer months (or weeks depending where you live) I use 100, all other times for outdoor 200

Indoor 200-400, at a push 800. Indoor flash I tend to use 200 if I can or 400


Canon: EOS 5DmkII • 50D • 40D • 350D • 100 f2.8L IS Macro • 70-200 f4L • 24-105 f4L IS • 17-40 f4L • 50 f1.4 • 60 f2.8 Macro • 85 f1.8 • 430EX • 580EX II • ST-E2
Sigma: 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC HSM • 30 f1.4 EX DC HSM • 17-50 f2.8 EX • 24-70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO
Apple: CS3, Aperture & iPhoto. Various Manfrotto, Portaflash, Battery Grips, SanDisk & Lowepro

alamy: my stock photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aero145
Senior Member
Avatar
909 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Germany
     
Sep 26, 2007 17:34 |  #33

ISO 100 thank you very much. Used with the 100-400. I'm getting sharp results at 400mm 1/400th most of the time. If I REALLY need a faster speed I put the ISO 200. Higher, it's noisy. My 20D ain't a good noise-wise copy.


EOS 5D Mark II | EF24-105 f/4L IS | EF100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | EF200 f/2.8L II | 580EX | Manfrotto 055xProB + 808RC4, and 679B
Le Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Sep 26, 2007 18:04 |  #34

aero145 wrote in post #4013845 (external link)
ISO 100 thank you very much. Used with the 100-400. I'm getting sharp results at 400mm 1/400th most of the time. If I REALLY need a faster speed I put the ISO 200. Higher, it's noisy. My 20D ain't a good noise-wise copy.

are you sure you don't own a nikon :D?

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Sep 26, 2007 20:26 |  #35

bbbig wrote in post #4010663 (external link)
Very interesting about those 160,320,640,1250 ISO settings... Do you see that resulting histogram at those settings are always "spiked"? In other words, unless you shoot at ISO 100/200/400/800/1600, it may result in inaccurate distribution of colors, even though the signal to noise ratio may be better at 160/320/640/1250. Any thoughts?

Yeah - I noticed that - especially interesting at the 3200 setting. Also, in the discussion, it was said that this is all irrelevant when shooting RAW anyway, which is what I do. In practical terms, I just don't know what it means though, or how significant it really is, sorry.

It looks like Glenn NK may have a good handle on this - maybe he'll chime in.

<OT vent>Actually, in practical terms, I'm still struggling getting my 30D/17-70 combination to play nicely together and focus! When I start getting sharp images, then I'll worry about noise :confused::mad:.</vent>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbbig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 26, 2007 21:20 |  #36

ed rader wrote in post #4014046 (external link)
are you sure you don't own a nikon :D?

ed rader


Yeah, I noticed Nikons only go as low as ISO 200??? That true??


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbbig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 26, 2007 21:27 |  #37

xarqi wrote in post #4014897 (external link)
Also, in the discussion, it was said that this is all irrelevant when shooting RAW anyway, which is what I do.

I would think that ISO settings are very relevent, even in RAW, because I would imagine RAW data is based on ISO setting (i.e. sensor sensitivity setting).

In other words, "ISO setting" in digital cameras is not some simulated value, but rather different sensor sensitivity calibration altogether... so you won't be able to simply simulate ISO 100 from an image that was taken in ISO 800, etc.

If anyone has a very technical background on this, please do enlighten me with the details! Thanks.


Roy

5D Mark III (external link) | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L (external link) (full gear list)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Sep 26, 2007 21:40 |  #38

The default ISO on my camera bodies is ISO 400. I'll adjust from there as necessary. This is not what I normally shoot at, just a reasonable mid-range ISO setting that I can easily adjust from going low or high.


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bosscat
Goldmember
1,892 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
     
Sep 26, 2007 22:28 as a reply to  @ Lord_Malone's post |  #39

ISO 100 most of the time, and ISO 200 if its late in the day, or i want a little more depth of field.

ISO 400, if its under the lights with flash.

After printing an 8x10 shot at ISO 800, will never go there again.

Just way too much noise for me.


Your camera is alot smarter than the "M" Zealots would have you believe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ajosteve
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,468 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Grand Canyon Arizona
     
Sep 26, 2007 22:32 |  #40

I shoot the xti with iso set at 200 or sometimes 400. I never go above that. The IS lenses are great. I have a friend that shoots the same camera and lens and she always is up to 800 or better, and all her bird shots in the middle of the day in good light are so grainy I can't stand it. She used to shoot with a non-IS lens and can't break the habbit of using a high ISO. Bummer.....steve


Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Sep 27, 2007 04:00 |  #41

bbbig wrote in post #4005802 (external link)
Here's a newbie question,

I usually shoot at lowest possible ISO to obtain the least noisy images. So, unless I want super-fast shutter speed, I am shooting ISO 100 (on my 30D) when I'm outdoors. Indoors, I use ISO 1600 if I don't happen to have a flash attached. Am I doing this right?

What ISOs do you normally use, and why?

100 al the time unless the shutter speed is getting too low, then I up it as needed, OH for amode that ups the ISO automatoically ( on my 5D)


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dockland
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
     
Sep 27, 2007 04:37 |  #42

ISO 100, almost all ocations.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jtfoto
Member
Avatar
83 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Wagga Wagga - Australia
     
Sep 27, 2007 07:28 as a reply to  @ Dockland's post |  #43

160 is lowest I'll go outdoors, 320 inside with flash and 1250 no flash for stage performances.


EOS5D Plus Grip,2 X EOS 5D11's plus grips, EOS 1VHS, 1DS Mark 2.
Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 17-40 f4 L, 70-200 f2.8 L IS,300 f4 L IS, 24-105L IS, 16-35 f2.8L, Extender EF 1.4, 3 x EX 58011's plus heaps of odds and ends
www.pro-imagephotography.com.a​u (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nutsnbolts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,279 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
     
Sep 27, 2007 08:22 |  #44

bbbig wrote in post #4015233 (external link)
Yeah, I noticed Nikons only go as low as ISO 200??? That true??

That's true.


Canon EOS 40D | EOS Rebel XTI/400D | G9
Lenses and Gear List
Review of my ThinkTank Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stooge_UK
Member
116 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Hockliffe, Bedfordshire, UK
     
Sep 27, 2007 09:00 |  #45

I base my choice of ISO on a number of things including:
Available Light
Lens being used
Shutter/Aperture setting
Effect I want to create in the photo

Hvaing said that so I dont get caught out I always set my ISO to 200, Aperture to around f9 and leave my camera in Aperture mode when i am finished for the day/shoot.
Experience of having shot eveything at 1600 in bright sunlight taught me this valuable lesson

Stu


Stooge

Taking life one frame at a time :)
http://www.goodwayphot​ography.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,660 views & 0 likes for this thread, 45 members have posted to it.
Dumb question: Which ISO do you normally shoot at?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2918 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.