Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 Sep 2007 (Thursday) 12:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First few shots from my 5D

 
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Sep 27, 2007 14:47 |  #16

Congrats the on the 5D! I surely love mine! Great pics! Get some ducks to make it official! =)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sinitry23
Senior Member
504 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Sep 27, 2007 14:48 |  #17

The 5D has a 1x crop factor, this is why it's better when using the 50mm lens on this body?

I am using a Tamron 17-55 F2.8 lens. I do plan on purchasing the 24-70mm L lens in the near future.

Nick_C wrote in post #4020196 (external link)
Some will say you can get near 5D quality with the 40D, while there are also others that have tried the 40D & say its nothing more than a 30D with a few extras.

I would suggest you try the 5D (if you can afford it) to see for yourself.

Remember the 5D & 40D are completely different, one being full frame, the other a cropped body the same as your 400D (XTI), they require a different strategy when deciding what lenses to buy, as a 50mm f/1.4 is far better on the 5D than it is on the 40D (so I hear) as you already know a 50mm is also more like 80mm on the 40D, so you can see for wideangle you have to purchase even wider lenses than what you do for a 5D.

Its really down to what you shoot the most, for landscapes most people will agree the 5D is king, or at least those that have tried it will, some will say you can get away with a 10-22 on a cropped body but ive been there & its not quite as enjoyable, seeing a wide scene through a smaller viewfinder isnt great if your using the camera all day.

Personally if I were you I would buy better glass, I dont know what you use now but your 400D (XTI) is a very good camera & from what I have seen on comparisons between the 400D & 40D there isnt a major difference, it might just be a case of needing to perfect your own talent a little further before blaiming the gear, I hope that doesnt offend you by me saying that, im not trying to down your own skills, what would I know!


http://www.william-chang.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Avatar
4,042 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
     
Sep 27, 2007 14:53 |  #18

sinitry23 wrote in post #4020257 (external link)
The 5D has a 1x crop factor, this is why it's better when using the 50mm lens on this body?

I am using a Tamron 17-55 F2.8 lens. I do plan on purchasing the 24-70mm L lens in the near future.

Yes all this means is that a 50mm lens on a 5D is a 50mm lens! a 50mm on a camera like yours looks more like an 80mm mounted on a 5D.

I hear lots of good things about the 24-70, but remember that this wont be very wide on your camera, you can actually see this for yourself, simply set your Tamron to just slightly under 40mm & this is how wide the 24-70 will look when mounted on your camera, for me its not wide enough for landscapes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MR2nice
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 27, 2007 14:57 |  #19

sinitry23 wrote in post #4019929 (external link)
Wow sharp pictures. Are you using a L lens? No photoshop enahancements? Was a tripod used?

Will I get good quality pictures like this on my XTI?

Yes, I used the 17-40mm L lens for those shots as Nick pointed out. It's actually the only lens I have so far since I just made the switch to Canon from Nikon. Yes, a tripod was used. I forgot to mentioned that I had a UV Filter attached. I'm curious to know if using the UV filter at night may degrade image quality a little?? Maybe some expert here can help answer that. I put it on for protection purpose. My passion for getting into photography happened one day last winter when I stumbled across a website that posted many beautiful night landscape shots. Thus, I started my research and here I am still trying to learn. I'm still very new to photography in general as I have no experience whatsoever. I spend most of my time at the bookstores and online reading whatever that I can. I've also learned a lot from this forum as I searched around and read some of the old threads. :D


Canon 5D Mark IIComplete Gear / Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Sep 27, 2007 14:59 |  #20

MR2nice wrote in post #4020318 (external link)
Yes, I used the 17-40mm L lens for those shots as Nick pointed out. It's actually the only lens I have so far since I just made the switch to Canon from Nikon. Yes, a tripod was used. I forgot to mentioned that I had a UV Filter attached. I'm curious to know if using the UV filter at night may degrade image quality a little?? Maybe some expert here can help answer that. I put it on for protection purpose. My passion for getting into photography happened one day last winter when I stumbled across a website that posted many beautiful night landscape shots. Thus, I started my research and here I am still trying to learn. I'm still very new to photography in general as I have no experience whatsoever. I spend most of my time at the bookstores and online reading whatever that I can. I've also learned a lot from this forum as I searched around and read some of the old threads. :D

learning pretty quick then too :)


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Avatar
4,042 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
     
Sep 27, 2007 15:01 |  #21

MR2nice wrote in post #4020318 (external link)
Yes, I used the 17-40mm L lens for those shots as Nick pointed out. It's actually the only lens I have so far since I just made the switch to Canon from Nikon. Yes, a tripod was used. I forgot to mentioned that I had a UV Filter attached. I'm curious to know if using the UV filter at night may degrade image quality a little?? Maybe some expert here can help answer that. I put it on for protection purpose. My passion for getting into photography happened one day last winter when I stumbled across a website that posted many beautiful night landscape shots. Thus, I started my research and here I am still trying to learn. I'm still very new to photography in general as I have no experience whatsoever. I spend most of my time at the bookstores and online reading whatever that I can. I've also learned a lot from this forum as I searched around and read some of the old threads. :D

It depends on what UV filter was used, if its a good quality one then you wouldnt notice any differences which has been shown in lots of tests recently, a bad quality one though will have a large effect!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MR2nice
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 27, 2007 15:04 |  #22

Nick_C wrote in post #4020342 (external link)
It depends on what UV filter was used, if its a good quality one then you wouldnt notice any differences which has been shown in lots of tests recently, a bad quality one though will have a large effect!

I'm currently using the B & W 77mm UV (Ultra Violet) Haze Multi Coated (2C) Glass Filter. I researched on this forum and many have said to be a good one. I also have one from Hoya as well.


Canon 5D Mark IIComplete Gear / Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MR2nice
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 27, 2007 15:10 |  #23

jdizzle wrote in post #4020247 (external link)
Congrats the on the 5D! I surely love mine! Great pics! Get some ducks to make it official! =)

Thanks! I will go duck hunting this weekend then. :lol:


Canon 5D Mark IIComplete Gear / Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
formula4speed
Senior Member
903 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Delaware
     
Sep 27, 2007 15:38 |  #24

Nick_C wrote in post #4020290 (external link)
Yes all this means is that a 50mm lens on a 5D is a 50mm lens! a 50mm on a camera like yours looks more like an 80mm mounted on a 5D.

I hear lots of good things about the 24-70, but remember that this wont be very wide on your camera, you can actually see this for yourself, simply set your Tamron to just slightly under 40mm & this is how wide the 24-70 will look when mounted on your camera, for me its not wide enough for landscapes.

Sorry, this is incorrect. The 17-50 at 24mm is exactly the same as the 24-70 at 24mm the lenses designed for smaller sensors can't cover larger sensors, but focal length has nothing to do with the sensor size. A 50mm lens is also a 50mm lens on both bodies, field of view and focal length are two different things.


I'm taking pictures of everything, so go ahead and take this place away from me.

5DII, 16-35mm f/2.8L II, ZE 28mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4L, ZE 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8L IS, 580 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Avatar
4,042 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
     
Sep 27, 2007 17:19 |  #25

formula4speed wrote in post #4020555 (external link)
Sorry, this is incorrect. The 17-50 at 24mm is exactly the same as the 24-70 at 24mm the lenses designed for smaller sensors can't cover larger sensors, but focal length has nothing to do with the sensor size. A 50mm lens is also a 50mm lens on both bodies, field of view and focal length are two different things.

Oops yes your correct, my mistake (was in a hurry as I was off out), yes you set the 17-50 to 24mm, NOT 40mm.

I cant believe I actually came up with that load of cobblers! :p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,725 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Oceanside, Calif.
     
Sep 27, 2007 17:55 |  #26

Nick_C wrote in post #4020290 (external link)
Yes all this means is that a 50mm lens on a 5D is a 50mm lens! a 50mm on a camera like yours looks more like an 80mm mounted on a 5D.

formula4speed wrote in post #4020555 (external link)
Sorry, this is incorrect. The 17-50 at 24mm is exactly the same as the 24-70 at 24mm the lenses designed for smaller sensors can't cover larger sensors, but focal length has nothing to do with the sensor size. A 50mm lens is also a 50mm lens on both bodies, field of view and focal length are two different things.

I don't see anything wrong with what Nick said. He did not mention field of view or focal length. And yes, if you look at the print, a 50mm on 1.6 looks like an 80mm on a FF.

I agree with what formual4speed is saying but this is all a bit confusing for someone new. Can't we just tell them what the effects look like and let them soak up the gory details of "why" later.


My Gear
DansRacePhotos.com (external link)

Dangerous Dan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Avatar
4,042 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
     
Sep 27, 2007 18:05 |  #27

DDan wrote in post #4021319 (external link)
I don't see anything wrong with what Nick said. He did not mention field of view or focal length. And yes, if you look at the print, a 50mm on 1.6 looks like an 80mm on a FF.

I agree with what formual4speed is saying but this is all a bit confusing for someone new. Can't we just tell them what the effects look like and let them soak up the gory details of "why" later.

Yes all of what I said was correct.

The part in question was that to simulate what a 24-70 looks like on a 1.6x body, he had to set his 17-55 to 24mm, NOT 40mm as I said by mistake.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hikin ­ Mike
Walkin' Like a Penguin Now!
Avatar
6,354 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 354
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Atwater, CA
     
Sep 27, 2007 20:58 |  #28

Welcome to the "club"!


Images in the Backcountry (external link)
Canon 5D 17-40 Ճ/4L 300 Ճ/4L IS 70-200 Ճ/4L 50 Ճ/1.8 1.4x TC Օ Kenko Ext. Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Denny ­ G
Goldmember
Avatar
1,870 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: On the border - US/Mexico
     
Sep 27, 2007 21:03 as a reply to  @ Nick_C's post |  #29

There are hundreds of comments on these forums about going ff. Up until 2004 I shot nothing but full frame (film) on Canon's best (EOS1 and 1n).

I like todays digital and will probable never shoot film again. There is nothing wrong with crop cameras and I have enjoyed the rebel and the 20d.

I don't change cameras at the drop of a hat. The 5D has been on my mind for awhile.

Now after looking at your photos I'm more convinced than ever that I will buy something in ff (Canon). Since I shoot landscape and sports (rodeo). More than likely I will continue with the 20d and probable buy the 5d.

Denny




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 27, 2007 21:09 |  #30

Denny G wrote in post #4022341 (external link)
Now after looking at your photos I'm more convinced than ever that I will buy something in ff (Canon). Since I shoot landscape and sports (rodeo). More than likely I will continue with the 20d and probable buy the 5d.

Denny, for now, that's my approach. I like having the 30D as both a backup camera and as a grab-and-shoot wildlife camera -- the cropping is cropping out pixels, but I do get to frame telephoto shots with my 30D.

I'm sure that the more I work with my 5D the less I will look to my 30D, but that would likely mean, among other things, getting more monstrous lenses.

Anyway, get the 5D, and keep the 20D, and be creative!

Tony

Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,123 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
First few shots from my 5D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Aristosan
432 guests, 196 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.