...
lear35man Hatchling 7 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Athens, GA More info | Sep 29, 2007 20:12 | #1 ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SeattleSpeedster Goldmember More info | Sep 29, 2007 20:22 | #2 ok so what do you like to shoot? Fuji GFX100s and A7R II | Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Otus and 28mm f1.4 Otus | Fuji GF23mm, GF45-100mm and GF32-64mm | Canon 200mm f1.8 Canon 70-200mm 2.8 ii | Zeiss 100-300mm | Zeiss 16-35mm f4 | Zeiss 135mm f2 | Zeiss and Sony 50mm f1.4 | Mavic 3 Pro and Inspire 2 X7 drones | https://mikereidphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dfindr Senior Member 676 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Gilbert, Arizona More info | Sep 29, 2007 20:35 | #3 What are you kidding, the 5D is a quantum leap in IQ from the 20D, and the 20D is not to shabby. If you can afford it get it no matter what you like to shoot. You will not be disappointed. Hang a 16-35 on it whether it be a I or II version, or you can even still find the 17-35 L, or if you want to go really crazy get the 14 mm f/2.8 and really go crazy wide. DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Sep 29, 2007 22:25 | #5 lear35man wrote in post #4033615 I mostly do landscapes, a lot of outdoor stuff. I do a lot of aerial photography. I use a 70-200 on the 20d for that. Occasionaly I do some outdoor family/engagement type pictures. I find that I take very few indoor shots. Thanks for all the input. that means you'll need a longer lens for your 5d or else you might want to consider keeping the 20d. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Sep 30, 2007 01:16 | #6 Keep the 20D and get the 5D for your wide angle shooting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2007 08:38 | #7 I love my 5D and the IQ is incredible, but I would probally go EF-S 10-22, keep the 28-70 and add a 70/200L and maybe a 40D and grip for not much more than a bare 5D, which will be superceeded next year. 1DsIII - 1D IV - 5DS R - IR Rebel -TS-E17L - 14L II - 35L - 135L - 400L 5.6 - 50 Compact Macro - Sigma 60 - 600 - 2 x 580EX II & CP-E3 - 270EX II - 1.4xII - 25mm Ext. - Angle Finder C - Induro/Induro - SkimmerPod II - Toshiba I7 - NEC Spectraview - Pro 9000 II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
squiress Senior Member 754 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: Denver, CO More info | Sep 30, 2007 08:49 | #8 Why not simply drop down to the 10-22 Canon lens. On the 20D you will get the equivalent of 16mm at low end and all the wide angle you could want. Certainly attractive economically. My Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johneo Goldmember 1,428 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: North Kingstown, RI More info | I've had a 10D since July 2003. Never saw a reason to upgrade to a 20D ... not even a 30D for that matter. This past July I upgraded to a 5D. The 5D and 10D (likely 20D as well) are in completely different leagues, in my opinion. 2 - 5DMKII's, Powershot SX 150 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stuartf287 Member 143 posts Joined May 2003 More info | You should consider a Sigma 12-24 on a 5D. It doesn't get much wider than that. Some users describe the 12-24 as one of those lenses that come in "good" and "bad" units. I have one that I use primarily on 1.6 crop digital cameras, so I can't tell you how it works on a full frame. I have used it on a film camera, and the prints look good. The developer I use thought the shots were taken with a fisheye. Good luck!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
icft Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined Nov 2005 More info | I recently got a 5D to go along with my 20D. The IQ of the 5D is truly amazing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bamamike Senior Member 278 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Huntsville, AL, USA More info | Oct 06, 2007 18:27 | #12 @stuartf287 Two bodies left, some "soso" lenses, and still a lot of gear.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ThomasOwenM Senior Member 959 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Boise, Idaho More info | I'm also considering upgrading from a 20D to a 5D because sometimes I'm frustrated with the crop factor. Sometimes I can't go wide enough. However, I have read up on full-frame sensors and their problems with vignetting. ===============
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newatthis Hatchling 3 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: South More info | Jumping in here with a question -- I had a 20 D and bought my husband a 5D for his birthday. It's his first digital. Before he was using film and had three EOS bodies. We're having trouble getting the exposure right. I'm just learning about the RAW image processing so that may be part of the problem, but even though the playback on the 5D looks great, when we download the images most of his outside pictures are overexposed. He's stopped down but it's still off a bit. Haven't tried the gray card yet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rickj Senior Member 365 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: gloucestershire UK More info | sorry for butting in but why is a 5d wider?? is this what you call a full frame lens? and if so what does that actually mean ? www.ichiban-koi.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2801 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||