joshbehan Senior Member  799 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Rhode Island More info | Sep 30, 2007 02:21 | #1 I was a second shooter again on this one. the groom and his groomsmen were all very good will hunting, boston type guys, accents and all. the groomsmen shots were outside his mom's house where they got ready, i like the boys from the neighborhood feel to them. c/c welcome  #2  #3  #4  #5 (DUPLICATE IMAGE)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2007 02:23 | #2 |
Nan08 Member  70 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Ca More info | Sep 30, 2007 11:43 | #3 i love your pp on the bride shot. good job! Ronan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2007 13:16 | #4 Nan08 wrote in post #4036531  i love your pp on the bride shot. good job! thanks, that's my favorite of the bunch.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ktgiggle Member 237 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Milpitas, CA More info | Sep 30, 2007 15:12 | #5 Nan08 wrote in post #4036531 i love your pp on the bride shot. good job! Me too (it's very chic...) Kim Truong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drogos Goldmember  1,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: CHICAGO More info | Sep 30, 2007 16:42 | #6 like them a lot except maybe 3rd ...it looks like the guy in the middle is the actual groom ... Lukasz Drogowski
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 01, 2007 01:05 | #7 drogos wrote in post #4037920 like them a lot except maybe 3rd ...it looks like the guy in the middle is the actual groom ... you're right, i think this photo will be good for them, but since there is no visible groom (except that he's wearing a vest, but it's hard to notice), not so much for our purposes here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
restech Senior Member  257 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Hi Josh nice pics man.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 01, 2007 01:55 | #9 restech wrote in post #4041086 Hi Josh nice pics man. Yah just like drago mention, at first look I though it was the groom on the middle. For the first one, I wish there was no car behind the last groomsman . i wish that too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcmadkat Goldmember  1,059 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Scotland More info | Oct 01, 2007 06:15 | #10 What about a little blur behind them?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 01, 2007 23:39 | #11 mcmadkat wrote in post #4041797 What about a little blur behind them? Seriously bad edit as I am in a hurry!
thanks for the edit madkat, i think it's still distracting though, i'd rather have it there and visible than blurry and "fake bokeh-ey". thanks for the comments
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drogos Goldmember 1,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: CHICAGO More info | Oct 02, 2007 08:13 | #12 joshbehan wrote in post #4047417 thanks for the edit madkat, i think it's still distracting though, i'd rather have it there and visible than blurry and "fake bokeh-ey". thanks for the comments that's exactly what i was thinking Lukasz Drogowski
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichBrownPhotography Goldmember  1,161 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Minnesota, USA More info | Oct 02, 2007 13:06 | #13 some good stuff here. I would like 1 a lot more but find the car really distracting in the background. 3 was done well and so was the bride shot. Richard Brown
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cccp145 Senior Member  261 posts Joined Oct 2006 More info | Oct 05, 2007 02:43 | #14 cool pics
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2027 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
